Early-Stage Ampullary Cancer: Is Local Excision an Effective Alternative to Radical Resection?

被引:1
|
作者
Swanson, James [1 ]
Littau, Michael [1 ]
Tonelli, Celsa [2 ]
Cohn, Tyler [2 ]
Luchette, Fred A. [3 ,5 ]
Abdelsattar, Zaid [4 ,5 ]
Baker, Marshall S. [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Maywood, IL USA
[2] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[3] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[4] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Maywood, IL USA
[5] Edward Hines Jr Vet Adm Med Ctr, Hines, IL USA
[6] Loyola Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 2160 S First St, Maywood, IL 60153 USA
关键词
RISK-FACTORS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000000666
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of local excision (transduodenal or endoscopic ampullectomy) in treating early-stage ampullary cancer has not been well defined. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing either local tumor excision or radical resection for early-stage (cTis-T2, N0, M0) ampullary adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2018. Cox modeling was used to identify factors associated with overall survival. Patients undergoing local excision were then 1:1 propensity score-matched for demographics, hospital level, and histopathological factors to those undergoing radical resection. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) profiles for matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1,544 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 218 (14%) underwent local tumor excision, and 1,326 (86%) radical resection. On propensity score matching, 218 patients undergoing local excision were successfully matched to 218 patients undergoing radical resection. On comparison of matched cohorts, those undergoing local excision had lower rate of margin-negative (R0) resection (85.1% vs 99%, p < 0.001) and lower median lymph node count (0 vs 13, p < 0.001) but had significantly shorter length of initial hospitalization (median days: 1 vs 10 days, p < 0.001), lower rate of 30-day readmission (3.3% vs 12.0%, p = 0.001), and lower rate of 30-day mortality (1.8% vs 6.5%, p = 0.016) than patients undergoing radical resection. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the matched cohorts (46.9% vs 52.0%, p = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with early-stage ampullary adenocarcinoma, local tumor excision is associated with higher rate of R1 resection but accelerated postprocedure recovery and patterns of OS comparable with those after radical resection. ( J Am Coll Surg 2023;237:146-156. (c) 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 156
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local excision results in comparable survival to radical resection for early-stage rectal carcinoid
    Ezekian, Brian
    Adam, Mohamad A.
    Turner, Megan C.
    Gilmore, Brian F.
    Freischlag, Kyle
    Leraas, Harold J.
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    Migaly, John
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 230 : 28 - 33
  • [2] SELECTION FACTORS FOR LOCAL EXCISION OR ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION OF EARLY-STAGE RECTAL-CANCER
    WILLETT, CG
    COMPTON, CC
    SHELLITO, PC
    EFIRD, JT
    CANCER, 1994, 73 (11) : 2716 - 2720
  • [3] Is radical surgery necessary for early-stage ampullary tumors?
    Ahmad, SA
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (12) : 955 - 956
  • [4] Is Radical Surgery Necessary for Early-Stage Ampullary Tumors?
    Syed A. Ahmad
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2005, 12 : 955 - 956
  • [5] Adjuvant radiotherapy after local excision instead of radical surgery for early-stage rectal cancer
    Santana Jimenez, Sofia
    Romero Fernandez, Jesus
    Sanchez Movilla, Arsenio
    Cordoba Largo, Sofia
    Benlloch Rodriguez, Raquel
    Alonso Sebastian, Isabel
    de Tejada Echanojauregui, Alberto Herreros
    Lopez Valcarcel, Marta
    Hernandez Miguel, Maria
    Gil Haro, Beatriz
    Zapata Paz, Irma
    Perez Mata, Sara
    Martinez Paredes, Francisco Javier
    Santiago Garcia, Jose
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S1551 - S1555
  • [6] Long-Term Outcome of Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Undergoing Standard Resection and Local Excision
    Peng, Junjie
    Chen, Wei
    Venook, Alan P.
    Sheng, Weiqi
    Xu, Ye
    Guan, Zuqing
    Cai, Guoxiang
    Cai, Sanjun
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2011, 10 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [7] Local resection versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shufa Tan
    Chenxi Xu
    Hongbo Ma
    Shikai Chen
    Yunyi Yang
    Yanrong Zhan
    Jiyun Wu
    Zhenfu Sun
    Bozhi Ren
    Qi Zhou
    Yaping Cu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2022, 37 : 1467 - 1483
  • [8] Local resection versus radical resection for early-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Shufa
    Xu, Chenxi
    Ma, Hongbo
    Chen, Shikai
    Yang, Yunyi
    Zhan, Yanrong
    Wu, Jiyun
    Sun, Zhenfu
    Ren, Bozhi
    Zhou, Qi
    Cu, Yaping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 37 (07) : 1467 - 1483
  • [9] Local Excision for Early-Stage Rectal Adenocarcinomas
    Donohue, Kristen
    Rossi, Alexander
    Deek, Matthew P.
    Feingold, Daniel
    Patel, Nell Maloney
    Jabbour, Salma K.
    CANCER JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (04): : 245 - 250
  • [10] ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Local Excision in Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
    Blackstock, William
    Russo, Suzanne M.
    Suh, W. Warren
    Cosman, Bard C.
    Herman, Joseph
    Mohiuddin, Mohammed
    Poggi, Matthew M.
    Regine, William F.
    Saltz, Leonard
    Small, William, Jr.
    Zook, Jennifer
    Konski, Andre A.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2010, 34 (03) : 193 - 200