Bank contribution to financial sector systemic risk and expected returns: Evidence from large U.S. banks

被引:2
|
作者
Usman, Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] CUI, Lahore Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Systemic risk; Ranking; Financial institutions; Endogeneity; BIG-TO-FAIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.bir.2022.10.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We estimate the contribution of large U.S. banks to the financial sector systemic risk by using value-at-risk (VaR), conditional value-at-risk (CoVaR), and two-stage least square (2SLS) methodology. Our sample is the monthly stock returns of 25 large U.S. banks from 1997 to 2021. We find that banks contributing more to the systemic risk have lower future returns on average. We also sort the portfolios' future returns into five pentiles based on systemic risk contribution (SRC ) and find that portfolios with high SRC earn lower future returns than those with low SRC. Our second contribution to the literature is the indication of the endogeneity problem in the SRC measures. We suggest an identification strategy for the estimation of SRC measures. Our results are contrary to some of the earlier studies, which concluded that the Dodd-Frank act of 2010 failed to eliminate the too-big-to-fail problem in banks. Such studies showed that anticipation of government subsidies has not been eliminated in the form of higher expected returns even for banks contributing more to systemic risk of the financial system. The results in our present study open a new research direction and are useful for investors and policymakers.Copyright (c) 2022 Borsa Istanbul Anonim S , irketi. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 216
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Temperature variability, natural disasters and bank systemic risk: Evidence from Chinese city commercial banks☆
    Wang, Daoping
    Wang, Yichun
    Liu, Yangjingzhuo
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 242
  • [42] Can digital transformation reduce bank systemic risk? Empirical evidence from listed banks in China
    Yao, Ting
    Song, Liangrong
    ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2023, 56 (06) : 4445 - 4463
  • [43] Can digital transformation reduce bank systemic risk? Empirical evidence from listed banks in China
    Ting Yao
    Liangrong Song
    Economic Change and Restructuring, 2023, 56 : 4445 - 4463
  • [44] Bank branching deregulation and the credit risk of the regional banking sector: Evidence from city commercial banks in China
    Wang, Chaochao
    Dong, Yan
    Ge, Ran
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 55
  • [45] Forced returns fuel anti-Americanism: Evidence from U.S. deportations to Latin America
    Ambrosius, Christian
    Meseguer, Covadonga
    Global Networks, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [46] Default Risk, Productivity, and the Environment: Theory and Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing
    Dana C. Andersen
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, 75 : 677 - 710
  • [47] ENJOYING THE QUIET LIFE UNDER DEREGULATION? EVIDENCE FROM ADJUSTED LERNER INDICES FOR U.S. BANKS
    Koetter, Michael
    Kolari, James W.
    Spierdijk, Laura
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (02) : 462 - 480
  • [48] Do risk governance and effective board affect bank performance? Evidence from large banks worldwide
    Kacem, Oumeima
    El Harbi, Sana
    RISK MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 24 (04): : 461 - 483
  • [49] Do risk governance and effective board affect bank performance? Evidence from large banks worldwide
    Oumeima Kacem
    Sana El Harbi
    Risk Management, 2022, 24 : 461 - 483
  • [50] Does financial regulation affect the profit efficiency and risk of banks? Evidence from China's commercial banks
    Lee, Tung-Hao
    Chih, Shu-Hwa
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2013, 26 : 705 - 724