EARLY PREDICTION OF UNEXPECTED LATENT SHOCK IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USING VITAL SIGNS

被引:2
|
作者
Chang, Hansol [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Weon [3 ]
Ha, Juhyung [4 ]
Yu, Jae Yong [5 ]
Heo, Sejin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Gun Tak [1 ]
Park, Jong Eun [1 ]
Lee, Se Uk [1 ]
Hwang, Sung Yeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hee [1 ]
Cha, Won Chul [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Shin, Tae Gun [1 ]
Kim, Taerim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Digital Hlth, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Samsung Med Ctr, Res Inst Future Med, Smart Hlth Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Syst Informat, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Samsung Med Ctr, Digital Innovat Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
SHOCK | 2023年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
Shock; clinical decision support system; emergency department; artificial intelligence; SEPSIS; TRIAGE; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000002181
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective/Introduction: Sequential vital-sign information and trends in vital signs are useful for predicting changes in patient state. This study aims to predict latent shock by observing sequential changes in patient vital signs. Methods: The dataset for this retrospective study contained a total of 93,194 emergency department (ED) visits from January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-ED data. We further divided the data into training and validation datasets by random sampling without replacement at a 7:3 ratio. We carried out external validation with MIMIC-IV-ED. Our prediction model included logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) classifier, a multilayer perceptron (MLP), and a recurrent neural network (RNN). To analyze the model performance, we used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Data of 89,250 visits of patients who met prespecified criteria were used to develop a latent-shock prediction model. Data of 142,250 patient visits from MIMIC-IV-ED satisfying the same inclusion criteria were used for external validation of the prediction model. The AUROC values of prediction for latent shock were 0.822, 0.841, 0.852, and 0.830 with RNN, MLP, RF, and LR methods, respectively, at 3 h before latent shock. This is higher than the shock index or adjusted shock index. Conclusion: We developed a latent shock prediction model based on 24 h of vital-sign sequence that changed with time and predicted the results by individual.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of Lifesaving Interventions Using Changes in Vital Signs from Prehospital Scene to Emergency Department
    Munoz, Jorge H. Mena
    Petersen, Ashley
    Guyette, Francis X.
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [2] Prehospital Vital Signs Accurately Predict Initial Emergency Department Vital Signs
    Trust, Marc D.
    Schellenberg, Morgan
    Biswas, Subarna
    Inaba, Kenji
    Cheng, Vincent
    Warriner, Zachary
    Love, Bryan E.
    Demetriades, Demetrios
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (03) : 254 - 259
  • [3] Automated collection of emergency department vital signs
    Finnell, J.
    Bagwell, S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 48 (04) : S38 - S38
  • [4] ORTHOSTATIC VITAL SIGNS IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS
    KOZIOLMCLAIN, J
    LOWENSTEIN, SR
    FULLER, B
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 20 (06) : 606 - 610
  • [5] Emergency Department Vital Signs and Outcomes After Discharge
    Gabayan, Gelareh Z.
    Gould, Michael K.
    Weiss, Robert E.
    Derose, Stephen F.
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Sarkisian, Catherine A.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 24 (07) : 846 - 854
  • [6] The Association of Pain Scores and Vital Signs In the Emergency Department
    Betcher, J.
    Kutsche, K.
    Ebadi-Tehrani, M.
    Springsteen, C.
    Phu, J.
    Jones, J. S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 58 (04) : S256 - S256
  • [7] Effectiveness of Communicating Vital Signs at Emergency Department Handoffs
    Venkatesh, A. K.
    Curley, D.
    Danh, S. T.
    Hansen, P.
    Rubin, J. T.
    Parry, B.
    Liu, S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 60 (04) : S49 - S50
  • [8] Improved Assessment and Documentation of Vital Signs in the Emergency Department
    Deitrick, Katie
    Davis, Joshua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2020, 35 (01) : 93 - 93
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF THE SHOCK INDEX AND CONVENTIONAL VITAL SIGNS TO IDENTIFY ACUTE, CRITICAL ILLNESS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    RADY, MY
    SMITHLINE, HA
    BLAKE, H
    NOWAK, R
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 24 (04) : 685 - 690
  • [10] Association of Vital Signs and Process Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients
    Hodgson, Nicole R.
    Poterack, Karl A.
    Mi, Lanyu
    Traub, Stephen J.
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (03) : 433 - 437