Integration of multi-physics and machine learning-based surrogate modelling approaches for multi-objective optimization of deformed GDL of PEM fuel cells

被引:44
|
作者
Wang, Jiankang [1 ]
Jiang, Hai [2 ]
Chen, Gaojian [2 ]
Wang, Huizhi [3 ]
Lu, Lu [4 ]
Liu, Jianguo [1 ,5 ]
Xing, Lei [6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Natl Lab Solid State Microstruct, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Mech Engn, London SW7 2BX, England
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] North China Elect Power Univ, Inst Energy Power Innovat, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Surrey, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi-physics modelling; Machine learning; Multi-objective optimization; Gas diffusion layer; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells; CATALYST LAYER; MULTIVARIABLE OPTIMIZATION; AGGLOMERATE MODEL; PREDICTION; TRANSPORT; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyai.2023.100261
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) greatly boosts scientific and engineering innovation. As one of the promising candidates for transiting the carbon intensive economy to zero emission future, proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells has aroused extensive attentions. The gas diffusion layer (GDL) strongly affects the water and heat management during PEM fuel cells operation, therefore multi-variable optimization, including thickness, porosity, conductivity, channel/rib widths and compression ratio, is essential for the improved cell performance. However, traditional experiment-based optimization is time consuming and economically unaffordable. To break down the obstacles to rapidly optimize GDLs, physics-based simulation and machine learning-based surrogate modelling are integrated to build a sophisticated M5 model, in which multi-physics and multi-phase flow simulation, machine-learning-based surrogate modelling, multi-variable and multi objects optimization are included. Two machine learning methodologies, namely response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN) are compared. The M5 model is proved to be effective and efficient for GDL optimization. After optimization, the current density and standard deviation of oxygen distribution at 0.4 V are improved by 20.8% and 74.6%, respectively. Pareto front is obtained to trade off the cell performance and homogeneity of oxygen distribution, e.g., 20.5% higher current density is achieved when sacrificing the standard deviation of oxygen distribution by 26.0%.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Plunge Milling of Titanium Alloys Based on Machine Learning and Multi-objective Optimization
    Weng J.
    Zhuang K.
    Pu D.
    Ding H.
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32 (07): : 771 - 777
  • [42] Extreme Learning Machine based on Improved Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization
    Tan, Kaimin
    2024 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION, ICCEA 2024, 2024, : 333 - 337
  • [43] Multi-objective, multi-physics optimization of 3D mixed-oxide LWR fuel assembly designs using the MOJADE algorithm
    Charles, Alan
    Parks, Geoffrey
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2020, 145 (145)
  • [44] Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of a novel UAV propulsion system based on PEM fuel cell
    Bahari, Mehran
    Rostami, Majid
    Entezari, Ashkan
    Ghahremani, Sheida
    Etminan, Melika
    FUEL, 2022, 311
  • [45] Multi-objective optimization of porous layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells based on neural network surrogate model
    Liu, Shengnan
    Chen, Cong
    Tan, Jiaqi
    Hu, Haoqin
    Xuan, Dongji
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (14) : 19796 - 19813
  • [46] Accelerating surrogate assisted evolutionary algorithms for expensive multi-objective optimization via explainable machine learning
    Li, Bingdong
    Yang, Yanting
    Liu, Dacheng
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhou, Aimin
    Yao, Xin
    SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2024, 88
  • [47] Generative machine learning-based multi-objective process parameter optimization towards energy and quality of injection molding
    Wu, Yirun
    Feng, Yiqing
    Peng, Shitong
    Mao, Zhongfa
    Chen, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (18) : 51518 - 51530
  • [48] A multi-objective optimization design to generate surrogate machine learning models in explainable artificial intelligence applications
    Monteiro, Wellington Rodrigo
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    EURO JOURNAL ON DECISION PROCESSES, 2023, 11
  • [49] Green mix design of rubbercrete using machine learning-based ensemble model and constrained multi-objective optimization
    Golafshani, Emadaldin Mohammadi
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Kashani, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 327
  • [50] Multi-objective teaching-learning-based optimization of combined commercial fuel cells for electricity production
    Hajabdollahi, Zahra
    Dehaj, Mohammad Shafiey
    Fu, Pei-Fang
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44