Machine learning versus regression for prediction of sporadic pancreatic cancer

被引：12

作者：

Chen, Wansu ^{[1
,6
]}

Zhou, Botao ^{[1
]}

Jeon, Christie Y. ^{[2
]}

Xie, Fagen ^{[1
]}

Lin, Yu-Chen ^{[2
]}

Butler, Rebecca K. ^{[1
]}

Zhou, Yichen ^{[1
]}

Luong, Tiffany Q. ^{[1
]}

Lustigova, Eva ^{[1
]}

Pisegna, Joseph R. ^{[3
,4
]}

Wu, Bechien U. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif Res & Evaluat, Pasadena, CA USA

[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA

[3] VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Los Angeles, CA USA

[4] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med & Human Genet, Los Angeles, CA USA

[5] Southern Calif Permanente Med Grp, Ctr Pancreat Care, Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, Los Angeles, CA USA

[6] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif, Dept Res & Evaluat, 100 S Robles,2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA

来源：

PANCREATOLOGY | 2023年 / 23卷 / 04期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

Risk prediction; Pancreatic cancer; Machine learning versus regression; Random survival forest; eXtreme gradient boosting; RANDOM SURVIVAL FORESTS; MODELS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.pan.2023.04.009

中图分类号：

R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background/objectives: There is currently no widely accepted approach to identify patients at increased risk for sporadic pancreatic cancer (PC). We aimed to compare the performance of two machine-learning models with a regression-based model in predicting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the most common form of PC. Methods: This retrospective cohort study consisted of patients 50-84 years of age enrolled in either Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC, model training, internal validation) or the Veterans Affairs (VA, external testing) between 2008 and 2017. The performance of random survival forests (RSF) and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB) models were compared to that of COX proportional hazards regression (COX). Heterogeneity of the three models were assessed. Results: The KPSC and the VA cohorts consisted of 1.8 and 2.7 million patients with 1792 and 4582 incident PDAC cases within 18 months, respectively. Predictors selected into all three models included age, abdominal pain, weight change, and glycated hemoglobin (A1c). Additionally, RSF selected change in alanine transaminase (ALT), whereas the XGB and COX selected the rate of change in ALT. The COX model appeared to have lower AUC (KPSC: 0.737, 95% CI 0.710-0.764; VA: 0.706, 0.699-0.714), compared to those of RSF (KPSC: 0.767, 0.744-0.791; VA: 0.731, 0.724-0.739) and XGB (KPSC: 0.779, 0.755-0.802; VA: 0.742, 0.735-0.750). Among patients with top 5% predicted risk from all three models (N 1/4 29,663), 117 developed PDAC, of which RSF, XGB and COX captured 84 (9 unique), 87 (4 unique), 87 (19 unique) cases, respectively. Conclusions: The three models complement each other, but each has unique contributions. & COPY; 2023 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：396 / 402

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] REGRESSION FOR PREDICTION VERSUS REGRESSION FOR CONTROL
HAHN, GJ
CHEMTECH, 1974, 4 (09) : 574 - 576
[32] Pancreatic Hormones Response-Generated Machine Learning Model Help Distinguish Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer From New-Onset Diabetes Cohort
Bao, Jiantong
Li, Ling
Sun, Chenyu
Qi, Liang
Tuason, John Pocholo W.
Kim, Na Hyun
Bhan, Chandur
Abdul, Humaed Mohammed
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 116 : S38 - S38
[33] Machine Learning Algorithms for Breast Cancer Prediction
Kumar, K. M. E. Senthil
Akalya, A.
Kanimozhi, V.
JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 30 (07): : E245 - E250
[34] The Application of Machine Learning in Cervical Cancer Prediction
Yin, Qihui
PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (ICMLT 2021), 2021, : 12 - 19
[35] Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis
Cruz, Joseph
Wishart, David
CANCER INFORMATICS, 2006, 2 : 59 - 77
[36] Machine Learning for Endometrial Cancer Prediction and Prognostication
Bhardwaj, Vipul
Sharma, Arundhiti
Parambath, Snijesh Valiya
Gul, Ijaz
Zhang, Xi
Lobie, Peter E.
Qin, Peiwu
Pandey, Vijay
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[37] Lung Cancer Prediction Based on Learning Machine
Wang, Ying
2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing and Computer Applications, ICIPCA 2023, 2023, : 247 - 251
[38] Machine Learning for Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction
Zheng, Ling
Eniola, Elijah
Wang, Jiacun
2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-PHYSICAL SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICCSI), 2021,
[39] Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction
Kourou, Konstantina
Exarchos, Themis P.
Exarchos, Konstantinos P.
Karamouzis, Michalis V.
Fotiadis, Dimitrios I.
COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 13 : 8 - 17
[40] Predicted prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients by machine learning
Higashi, M.
Yokoyama, S.
Tanimoto, A.
VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 : S198 - S198

← 1 2 3 4 5 →