Applications of multi-fidelity multi-output Kriging to engineering design optimization

被引:15
|
作者
Toal, David J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Boldrewood Innovat Campus, Southampton SO16 7QF, England
基金
芬兰科学院; “创新英国”项目;
关键词
Multi-output; Multi-fidelity; Kriging; EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; MODELS; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-023-03567-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Surrogate modelling is a popular approach for reducing the number of high fidelity simulations required within an engineering design optimization. Multi-fidelity surrogate modelling can further reduce this effort by exploiting low fidelity simulation data. Multi-output surrogate modelling techniques offer a way for categorical variables e.g. the choice of material, to be included within such models. While multi-fidelity multi-output surrogate modelling strategies have been proposed, to date only their predictive performance rather than optimization performance has been assessed. This paper considers three different multi-fidelity multi-output Kriging based surrogate modelling approaches and compares them to ordinary Kriging and multi-fidelity Kriging. The first approach modifies multi-fidelity Kriging to include multiple outputs whereas the second and third approaches model the different levels of simulation fidelity as different outputs within a multi-output Kriging model. Each of these techniques is assessed using three engineering design problems including the optimization of a gas turbine combustor in the presence of a topological variation, the optimization of a vibrating truss where the material can vary and finally, the parallel optimization of a family of airfoils.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computationally Efficient Multi-Fidelity Multi-Grid Design Optimization of Microwave Structures
    Koziel, Slawomir
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 25 (07): : 578 - 586
  • [32] ADAPTIVE MULTI-FIDELITY POLYNOMIAL CHAOS-KRIGING MODEL-BASED EFFICIENT AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OPTIMIZATION METHOD
    Zhao H.
    Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55 (01): : 223 - 238
  • [33] Multi-Output Variable-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization of a Common Mode Choke
    Rezende, Rodrigo Silva
    Hadziefendic, Mirsad
    Hansen, Jan
    Schuhmann, Rolf
    2021 JOINT IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, SIGNAL & POWER INTEGRITY, AND EMC EUROPE (EMC+SIPI AND EMC EUROPE), 2021, : 1093 - 1098
  • [34] Multi-fidelity robust aerodynamic design optimization under mixed uncertainty
    Shah, Harsheel
    Hosder, Serhat
    Koziel, Slawomir
    Tesfahunegn, Yonatan A.
    Leifsson, Leifur
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 45 : 17 - 29
  • [35] An efficient multi-fidelity design optimization framework for a thermoelectric generator system
    Lee, Mingyu
    Jung, Yongsu
    Hwang, Chulhyun
    Kim, Minjik
    Kim, Minwoo
    Lee, Ungki
    Lee, Ikjin
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 315
  • [36] Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling
    Forrester, Alexander I. J.
    Sobester, Andras
    Keane, Andy J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 463 (2088): : 3251 - 3269
  • [37] A multi-objective bayesian optimization approach based on variable-fidelity multi-output metamodeling
    Lin, Quan
    Zheng, Anran
    Hu, Jiexiang
    Shu, Leshi
    Zhou, Qi
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 66 (05)
  • [38] Adaptive Objective Selection for Multi-Fidelity Optimization
    Akimoto, Youhei
    Shimizu, Takuma
    Yamaguchi, Takahiro
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'19), 2019, : 880 - 888
  • [39] Research on multi-fidelity aerodynamic optimization methods
    Huang Likeng
    Gao Zhenghong
    Zhang Dehu
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics , 2013, (02) : 279 - 286
  • [40] Research on multi-fidelity aerodynamic optimization methods
    Huang Likeng
    Gao Zhenghong
    Zhang Dehu
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26 (02) : 279 - 286