Inland terminal location selection using the multi-stakeholder best-worst method

被引:15
|
作者
Liang, Fuqi [1 ]
Verhoeven, Kyle [1 ]
Brunelli, Matteo [2 ]
Rezaei, Jafar [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Trento, Dept Ind Engn, Trento, Italy
关键词
Inland terminal location selection; shipping line; best-worst method; consensus;
D O I
10.1080/13675567.2021.1885634
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to develop an inland terminal location selection methodology. This methodology is viewed from the perspective of the shipping line designing the inland transport chain while also taking the objectives of multiple other stakeholders into account. To that end, we develop a consensus model for a group Best-Worst Method (BWM) in order to aggregate the evaluations of the various stakeholders. The proposed method is applied to a real-life case study involving the Maersk shipping line, in which nine experts representing three different types of stakeholders assess six possible locations. After the evaluation, the market volume potential is identified as one of the most important criteria. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis indicates that a varying influx of the container volume has no impact on the most desirable location.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 385
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [12] An analytical framework for the best-worst method
    Wu, Qun
    Liu, Xinwang
    Zhou, Ligang
    Qin, Jindong
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 123
  • [13] Multi-criteria sustainable supplier selection using piecewise linear value function and fuzzy best-worst method
    Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh
    Khazaeili, Mohammad
    Amini, Amir
    Osgooei, Elnaz
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (02) : 2309 - 2325
  • [14] Group decision making in best-worst method when the best and worst are not unique: case study of scholar selection
    Adali, Esra Aytac
    Caglar, Atalay
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 29 (01): : 30 - 44
  • [15] Sustainable Lean Six Sigma project selection in manufacturing environments using best-worst method
    Swarnakar, Vikas
    Singh, A. R.
    Antony, Jiju
    Tiwari, Anil Kr
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 34 (7-8) : 990 - 1014
  • [16] Estimating commuting modal split by using the Best-Worst Method
    Duleba, Szabolcs
    Moslem, Sarbast
    Esztergar-Kiss, Domokos
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [17] Estimating commuting modal split by using the Best-Worst Method
    Szabolcs Duleba
    Sarbast Moslem
    Domokos Esztergár-Kiss
    European Transport Research Review, 2021, 13
  • [18] A multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria decision making
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 47 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [19] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [20] Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method
    Ambilkar, Priya
    Verma, Priyanka
    Das, Debabrata
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 161 - 175