Power and biogas to methanol - A techno-economic analysis of carbon-maximized green methanol production via two reforming approaches

被引:7
|
作者
Bube, Stefan [1 ]
Sens, Lucas [1 ]
Drawer, Chris [1 ]
Kaltschmitt, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol TUHH, Inst Environm Technol & Energy Econ IUE, Eissendorfer Str 40, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Methanol; Biogas; Reforming; Process simulation; Methanol production costs; Carbon efficiency; GAS; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118220
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The limited potential of sustainably available biomass requires efficient conversion to defossilize future demands of carbon-based chemicals and energy carriers. Therefore, integrating electricity-derived hydrogen into biomassbased production concepts appears promising, maximizing carbon utilization while minimizing biomass requirement. However, specific process concepts and analyses are still lacking to quantify the potential technical and economic benefits of such hybrid production processes. Thus, this research paper investigates this novel approach for decentralized methanol production from biogas within a techno-economic analysis, considering two production configurations. One configuration (BiRef) utilizes electrically heated bi-reforming for syngas generation, while the other configuration (TriRef) uses autothermal tri-reforming. Based on stationary process simulations, in-depth knowledge about process behavior is gained, efficiencies and costs are determined, and influencing factors are assessed. Within the reference case, the BiRef configuration achieves a carbon efficiency of 93 %, while the TriRef configuration reaches 97 % due to its enhanced methane conversion. Energy efficiency is 5 %pt. higher within the BiRef configuration (74 %), primarily due to the lower hydrogen demand. Carbon and energy efficiency are crucially affected by reforming temperature and inert gas fraction in the syngas. The economic analysis shows methanol production costs of ca. 1,300 euro2022/t for both configurations. Variations in economic parameters emphasize advantages for the TriRef configuration when low hydrogen costs (<6 euro2022/kg) are achievable. The comparison with purely biogas-based methanol production shows that hydrogen addition increases production capacity by up to 67 %. Cost advantages result against purely electricity-based production, while cost parity is achieved with purely biogas-based production. This paper demonstrates the potential of hybrid methanol production for efficient biogas utilization and highlights decisive parameters influencing technical and economic efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Kinetic Modeling and Techno-Economic Analysis of a Methanol-to-Gasoline Production Repurposed Refinery Equipment
    Gallego, Carolina Arias
    Khandavilli, Muralikrishna
    Kobayashi, Leiliang
    Sarathy, S. Mani
    ACS OMEGA, 2024, 9 (21): : 22858 - 22870
  • [42] Techno-economic analysis of integrated hydrogen and methanol production process by CO2 hydrogenation
    Yousaf, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Asif
    Elkamel, Ali
    Rizwan, Muhammad
    Zaman, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2022, 115
  • [43] Comparative techno-economic assessment of methanol production via directly and indirectly electrified biomass gasification routes
    Klueh, Daniel
    Anetjarvi, Eemeli
    Melin, Kristian
    Vakkilainen, Esa
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 314
  • [44] Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transportation infrastructure using ammonia and methanol
    Cui, Jinyue
    Aziz, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (42) : 15737 - 15747
  • [45] Techno-economic analysis of an absorption based methanol to olefins recovery section
    Reyniers, Pieter A.
    Vandewalle, Laurien A.
    Saerens, Stephanie
    de Smedt, Philip
    Marin, Guy B.
    Van Geem, Kevin M.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 115 : 477 - 490
  • [46] Techno-Economic Analysis and Optimization of Gray and Green Methanol Synthesis Using Flowsheet Automation and Surrogate Modeling
    Andreasen, Anders
    van Baten, Jasper
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2025, 39 (06) : 3359 - 3374
  • [47] Techno-economic comparison of biogas cleaning for grid injection, compressed natural gas, and biogas-to-methanol conversion technologies
    Sheets, Johnathon P.
    Shah, Ajay
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2018, 12 (03): : 412 - 425
  • [49] Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology
    Collet, Pierre
    Flottes, Eglantine
    Favre, Alain
    Raynal, Ludovic
    Pierre, Helene
    Capela, Sandra
    Peregrina, Carlos
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 192 : 282 - 295
  • [50] Carbon dioxide utilization in a gas-to-methanol process combined with CO2/Steam-mixed reforming: Techno-economic analysis
    Zhang, Chundong
    Jun, Ki-Won
    Gao, Ruxing
    Kwak, Geunjae
    Park, Hae-Gu
    FUEL, 2017, 190 : 303 - 311