Training of Feed-Forward Neural Networks by Using Optimization Algorithms Based on Swarm-Intelligent for Maximum Power Point Tracking

被引:3
|
作者
Kaya, Ebubekir [1 ]
Kaya, Ceren Bastemur [2 ]
Bendes, Emre [1 ]
Atasever, Sema [1 ]
Ozturk, Basak [1 ]
Yazlik, Bilgin [1 ]
机构
[1] Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Univ, Engn Architecture Fac, Dept Comp Engn, TR-50300 Nevsehir, Turkiye
[2] Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli Univ, Nevsehir Vocat Sch, Dept Comp Technol, TR-50300 Nevsehir, Turkiye
关键词
swarm intelligence; feed-forward neural network; maximum power point tracking; metaheuristic algorithm; META-HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL BEE COLONY; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; MPPT ALGORITHM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/biomimetics8050402
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One of the most used artificial intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking is artificial neural networks. In order to achieve successful results in maximum power point tracking, the training process of artificial neural networks is important. Metaheuristic algorithms are used extensively in the literature for neural network training. An important group of metaheuristic algorithms is swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. In this study, feed-forward neural network training is carried out for maximum power point tracking by using 13 swarm-intelligent-based optimization algorithms. These algorithms are artificial bee colony, butterfly optimization, cuckoo search, chicken swarm optimization, dragonfly algorithm, firefly algorithm, grasshopper optimization algorithm, krill herd algorithm, particle swarm optimization, salp swarm algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, tunicate swarm algorithm, and tuna swarm optimization. Mean squared error is used as the error metric, and the performances of the algorithms in different network structures are evaluated. Considering the results, a success ranking score is obtained for each algorithm. The three most successful algorithms in both training and testing processes are the firefly algorithm, selfish herd optimizer, and grasshopper optimization algorithm, respectively. The training error values obtained with these algorithms are 4.5 x 10-4, 1.6 x 10-3, and 2.3 x 10-3, respectively. The test error values are 4.6 x 10-4, 1.6 x 10-3, and 2.4 x 10-3, respectively. With these algorithms, effective results have been achieved in a low number of evaluations. In addition to these three algorithms, other algorithms have also achieved mostly acceptable results. This shows that the related algorithms are generally successful ANFIS training algorithms for maximum power point tracking.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiplication units in feed-forward neural networks and its training
    Li, DZ
    Hirasawa, K
    Hu, JL
    Murata, J
    ICONIP'02: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING: COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE FOR THE E-AGE, 2002, : 75 - 79
  • [22] Constructing and training feed-forward neural networks for pattern classification
    Jiang, XD
    Wah, AHKS
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2003, 36 (04) : 853 - 867
  • [23] Training of large-scale feed-forward neural networks
    Seiffert, Udo
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORK PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-10, 2006, : 5324 - 5329
  • [24] Evolutionary approach to training feed-forward and recurrent neural networks
    Riley, Jeff
    Ciesielski, Victor B.
    International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Proceedings, KES, 1998, 3 : 596 - 602
  • [25] Training algorithm with incomplete data for feed-forward neural networks
    Yoon, SY
    Lee, SY
    NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 1999, 10 (03) : 171 - 179
  • [26] A structure optimization framework for feed-forward neural networks using sparse representation
    Yang, Jie
    Ma, Jun
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2016, 109 : 61 - 70
  • [27] Power system network observability determination using feed-forward neural networks
    Jain, A
    Choi, J
    Min, J
    POWERCON 2002: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 2086 - 2090
  • [28] Optimal identification using feed-forward neural networks
    Vergara, V
    Sinne, S
    Moraga, C
    FROM NATURAL TO ARTIFICIAL NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 930 : 1052 - 1059
  • [29] Evapotranspiration estimation using feed-forward neural networks
    Kisi, Ozgur
    NORDIC HYDROLOGY, 2006, 37 (03) : 247 - 260
  • [30] Modeling a scrubber using feed-forward neural networks
    Milosavljevic, N
    Heikkilä, P
    TAPPI JOURNAL, 1999, 82 (03): : 197 - 201