Patterns, drivers, and a predictive model of dam removal cost in the United States

被引:8
|
作者
Duda, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Jumani, Suman [2 ,3 ]
Wieferich, Daniel J. [4 ]
Tullos, Desiree [5 ]
McKay, S. Kyle [2 ]
Randle, Timothy J. [6 ]
Jansen, Alvin [6 ]
Bailey, Susan [2 ]
Jensen, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Johnson, Rachelle C. [1 ]
Wagner, Ella [1 ]
Richards, Kyla [4 ]
Wenger, Seth J. [3 ]
Walther, Eric J. [3 ]
Bountry, Jennifer A. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Western Fisheries Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] US Army Corps Engn, Environm Lab, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Vicksburg, MS USA
[3] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Sci Analyt & Synth, Denver, CO USA
[5] Oregon State Univ, Biol & Ecol Engn Dept, Corvallis, OR USA
[6] Tech Serv Ctr, Bur Reclamat, Denver, CO USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
dam removal; cost drivers; economics; river restoration; cost engineering; ALTERED FLOW REGIMES; ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES; SCIENCE; RIVER; CONNECTIVITY; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; DECISIONS; POLITICS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1215471
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Given the burgeoning dam removal movement and the large number of dams approaching obsolescence in the United States, cost estimating data and tools are needed for dam removal prioritization, planning, and execution. We used the list of removed dams compiled by American Rivers to search for publicly available reported costs for dam removal projects. Total cost information could include component costs related to project planning, dam deconstruction, monitoring, and several categories of mitigation activities. We compiled reported costs from 455 unique sources for 668 dams removed in the United States from 1965 to 2020. The dam removals occurred within 571 unique projects involving 1-18 dams. When adjusted for inflation into 2020 USD, cost of these projects totaled $1.522 billion, with per-dam costs ranging from $1 thousand (k) to $268.8 million (M). The median cost for dam removals was $157k, $823k, and $6.2M for dams that were< 5 m, between 5-10 m, and > 10 m in height, respectively. Geographic differences in total costs showed that northern states in general, and the Pacific Northwest in particular, spent the most on dam removal. The Midwest and the Northeast spent proportionally more on removal of dams less than 5 m in height, whereas the Northwest and Southwest spent the most on larger dam removals > 10 m tall. We used stochastic gradient boosting with quantile regression to model dam removal cost against potential predictor variables including dam characteristics (dam height and material), hydrography (average annual discharge and drainage area), project complexity (inferred from construction and sediment management, mitigation, and post-removal cost drivers), and geographic region. Dam height, annual average discharge at the dam site, and project complexity were the predominant drivers of removal cost. The final model had an R-2 of 57% and when applied to a test dataset model predictions had a root mean squared error of $5.09M and a mean absolute error of $1.45M, indicating its potential utility to predict estimated costs of dam removal. We developed a R shiny application for estimating dam removal costs using customized model inputs for exploratory analyses and potential dam removal planning.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States
    Ryan Bellmore, J.
    Duda, Jeffrey J.
    Craig, Laura S.
    Greene, Samantha L.
    Torgersen, Christian E.
    Collins, Mathias J.
    Vittum, Katherine
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, 2017, 4 (02):
  • [2] The seasonality of nonpolio enteroviruses in the United States: Patterns and drivers
    Pons-Salort, Margarita
    Oberste, M. Steven
    Pallansch, Mark A.
    Abedi, Glen R.
    Takahashi, Saki
    Grenfell, Bryan T.
    Grassly, Nicholas C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (12) : 3078 - 3083
  • [3] Unmasking healthcare supply chain cost drivers in the United States
    Essila, Jean C.
    Motwani, Jaideep
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (04) : 1350 - 1382
  • [4] Key cost drivers of pharmaceutical clinical trials in the United States
    Sertkaya, Aylin
    Wong, Hui-Hsing
    Jessup, Amber
    Beleche, Trinidad
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (02) : 117 - 126
  • [5] Tree mortality in the eastern and central United States: patterns and drivers
    Dietze, Michael C.
    Moorcroft, Paul R.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (11) : 3312 - 3326
  • [6] Drivers of Geographic Patterns in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing in the United States
    Kissler, Stephen M.
    Roster, Kirstin I. Oliveira
    Petherbridge, Rachel
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Grad, Yonatan H.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 79 (02) : 325 - 328
  • [7] DAMS Study Evaluates Dam-Removal Trends In the United States
    Landers, Jay
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 88 (07): : 29 - 30
  • [8] Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States
    Foley, Melissa M.
    Magilligan, Francis J.
    Torgersen, Christian E.
    Major, Jon J.
    Anderson, Chauncey W.
    Connolly, Patrick J.
    Wieferich, Daniel
    Shafroth, Patrick B.
    Evans, James E.
    Infante, Dana
    Craig, Laura S.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [9] Patterns and drivers for wetland connections in the Prairie Pothole Region, United States
    Vanderhoof, Melanie K.
    Christensen, Jay R.
    Alexander, Laurie C.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 25 (03) : 275 - 297
  • [10] Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States
    Hammond, John C.
    Zimmer, Margaret
    Shanafield, Margaret
    Kaiser, Kendra
    Godsey, Sarah E.
    Mims, Meryl C.
    Zipper, Samuel C.
    Burrows, Ryan M.
    Kampf, Stephanie K.
    Dodds, Walter
    Jones, C. Nathan
    Krabbenhoft, Corey A.
    Boersma, Kate S.
    Datry, Thibault
    Olden, Julian D.
    Allen, George H.
    Price, Adam N.
    Costigan, Katie
    Hale, Rebecca
    Ward, Adam S.
    Allen, Daniel C.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (02)