Clinical evaluation of anterior nasal cavity swab specimens by a rapid antigen test using a GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit to diagnose COVID-19

被引:1
|
作者
Ogane, Kana [1 ]
Imai, Kazuo [1 ,3 ]
Orihara, Yuta [1 ]
Kodana, Masahiro [1 ]
Tezuka, Mariko [1 ]
Matsuzaki, Nanako [1 ]
Takahashi, Rina [1 ]
Ichimura, Shintaro [1 ]
Tokano, Mieko [2 ]
Sakai, Jun [2 ]
Tarumoto, Norihito [2 ]
Maesaki, Shigefumi [2 ]
Takuya, Maeda [1 ]
机构
[1] Saitama Med Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Saitama, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Infect Dis & Infect Control, Saitama, Japan
[3] Saitama Med Univ, Dept Clin Lab, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama 3500495, Japan
关键词
SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Anterior nasal swab; RT-qPCR; Rapid antigen test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jiac.2023.05.010
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The promising diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests (RATs) using non-invasive anterior nasal (AN) swab specimens to diagnose COVID-19 has been reported. A large number of RATs are commercially available; however, the careful assessment of RATs is essential prior to their implementation in clinical practice. We evaluated the clinical performance of the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit as a RAT using AN swabs in a prospective, blinded study. Adult patients who visited outpatient departments and received SARS-CoV-2 tests between August 16 and September 8, 2022, were eligible for this study. Patients who were aged under 18 years and patients without appropriate specimens were excluded. Two sets of AN and nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs were collected from all patients. Each set of specimens was tested by the RAT and quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Of the 138 recruited patients, 84 were positive and 54 were negative by RT-qPCR using NP swabs. The positive agreement rate between RT-qPCR using NP swabs and RAT using AN swabs was 78.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.3%-86.8%), the negative agreement rate was 98.1% (95% CI, 90.1%- 99.9%), and the overall agreement rate was 86.2% (95% CI, 79.3%-91.5%), with a & kappa; coefficient of 0.73. The positive agreement rate in the early phase (& LE;3 days from symptom onset) was >80%, but this fell to 50% in the late phase (& GE;4 days). This study demonstrates that the GLINE-2019-nCoV Ag Kit using AN swabs has good clinical performance and might be a reliable alternative method for diagnosing COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 828
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] Clinical Validation of GenBody COVID-19 Ag, Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Rapid Antigen Tests for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in European Adult Population
    Wegrzynska, Karolina
    Walory, Jaroslaw
    Charkiewicz, Radoslaw
    Lewandowska, Marzena Anna
    Wasko, Izabela
    Kozinska, Aleksandra
    Majewski, Piotr
    Baraniak, Anna
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [22] Development and Clinical Evaluation of an Immunochromatography-Based Rapid Antigen Test (GenBody™ COVAG025) for COVID-19 Diagnosis
    Kim, Doyeong
    Lee, Jihoo
    Bal, Jyotiranjan
    Seo, Seul Ki
    Chong, Chom-Kyu
    Lee, Jong Ho
    Park, Hyun
    VIRUSES-BASEL, 2021, 13 (05):
  • [23] COMPARISON OF SARS-COV-2 RAPID ANTIGEN TEST WITH SELF-COLLECTED DEEP NASAL SWAB VERSUS HEALTHCARE PRACTITIONER COLLECTED NASOPHARYNGEAL POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR) SWAB FOR SYMPTOMATIC COVID-19
    Wilson, O.
    Ricciuto, G.
    Brown, D.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (SUPPL 1) : S36 - S36
  • [24] Can Self-Administered Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs) Help Rural India? An Evaluation of the CoviSelf Kit as a Response to the 2019-2022 COVID-19 Pandemic
    Vicziany, Marika
    Hardikar, Jaideep
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [25] Clinical Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Panbio™ COVID-19/Flu A&B Rapid Panel: A Combination Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Omicron Variant and Influenza A Virus
    Yamagishi, Hirokazu
    Tamura, Daisuke
    Yamazaki, Masahiko
    Abe, Takashi
    Mitamura, Keiko
    Tajima, Toshihiro
    Osaka, Hitoshi
    VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 37 (06) : 317 - 321
  • [26] Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department
    Garcia-Fernandez, Sergio
    Pablo-Marcos, Daniel
    Velasco de la Fuente, Silvia
    Jose Reina Rodriguez, Maria
    Gozalo, Monica
    Rodriguez-Lozano, Jesus
    Manuel Mendez-Legaza, Jose
    Calvo, Jorge
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 103 (02)
  • [27] A single-center experience on long-term clinical performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection Test, STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test
    Seo Wan Kim
    Yongjung Park
    Dokyun Kim
    Seok Hoon Jeong
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [28] A single-center experience on long-term clinical performance of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection Test, STANDARD Q COVID-19 Ag Test
    Kim, Seo Wan
    Park, Yongjung
    Kim, Dokyun
    Jeong, Seok Hoon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [29] Performance Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test for COVID-19 with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR using Nasopharyngeal Swab with Special Reference to RNA Dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRp) Cycle Threshold Values
    Prakash, Vidyut
    Saurabh, Kumar
    Kumar, Rishikesh
    Kumar, Randhir
    Kumari, Namrata
    Kumar, Shailesh
    JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 17 (04): : 2316 - 2323
  • [30] Evaluation of FAST COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test Kit for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples from Mildly Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Patients
    Polvere, Immacolata
    Voccola, Serena
    D'Andrea, Silvia
    Zerillo, Lucrezia
    Varricchio, Romualdo
    Madera, Jessica Raffaella
    Stilo, Romania
    Vito, Pasquale
    Zotti, Tiziana
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (03)