Study on the effects of multiple primers on the pull-off strength of gypsum plaster and its mechanism

被引:0
|
作者
Ji, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
He, Tingshu [1 ,2 ]
Da, Yongqi [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yuhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Yanta Rd 13th, Xian 710055, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ADHESION | 2024年 / 100卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Gypsum plaster; Aerated concrete substrate; Primer; Pull-offstrength; DESULFURIZATION GYPSUM; CITRIC-ACID; ADHESION; CREEP;
D O I
10.1080/00218464.2023.2216640
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Although gypsum plaster has been well studied, there are few related researches on the effects of primers on the pull-off strength of gypsum plaster in the plastering systems. Therefore, the effects of no primer, vinyl acetate ethylene (VAE)-type primers, styrene-acrylic (SA)-type primers, and acetate-acrylic (AA)-type primers on the pull-off strength of gypsum plaster, were comparatively discussed. The results indicated that these primers all can chemically bond with the gypsum plaster and aerated concrete substrate, thus the adhesion of gypsum plaster on the substrate was promoted, and the failure type in the pull-off strength test changed from adhesive failure to cohesive failure. With the better permeability of primers and the lower degree of the pore blocking, the negative impacts on the gypsum dihydrate crystals were smaller, the mechanical interlocking force generated between the substrate and the gypsum plaster was larger, and the damage surface of cohesive failure is further away from the bonding transition area (plaster/primer/substrate). Therefore, the application of VAE-type primers and AA-type primers could increase the pull-off strength of gypsum plaster by 1.74-2.44 times and 1.70-1.90 times, respectively, while the application of SA-type primers would reduce the pull-off strength of gypsum plaster by at least 30%.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 266
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the tensile strength of rocks and geological discontinuities via pull-off tests
    Cacciari, Pedro Pazzoto
    Futai, Marcos Massao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2018, 105 : 44 - 52
  • [22] PULL-OFF STRENGTH OF GARDNER-WELLS TONGS FROM CADAVERIC CRANIA
    KRAG, MH
    BYRT, W
    POPE, M
    SPINE, 1989, 14 (03) : 247 - 250
  • [23] Pull-off Strength of Jagged Pin-reinforced Composite Hat Joints
    Kwak, Byeong-Su
    Kim, Dong-Gwan
    Kweon, Jin-Hwe
    COMPOSITES RESEARCH, 2018, 31 (06): : 323 - 331
  • [24] Measuring Foliation Tensile Strength of Metamorphic Rock by Using Pull-Off Test
    Weng, Meng-Chia
    Li, Jin-Hong
    Lin, Cheng-Han
    Liao, Chu-Tsen
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2018, 41 (01): : 132 - 140
  • [25] Thermal Effects on Pull-Off Force in the Johnson–Kendall–Roberts Model
    Yunong Zhou
    Tribology Letters, 2021, 69
  • [26] Mesoscale modelling of the FRP-concrete debonding mechanism in the pull-off test
    Wang, Xuan
    Zhao, Tianlin
    Guo, Jialong
    Zhang, Zihua
    Song, Xiaogang
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2023, 309
  • [27] A Systematic Study on the Effects of Key Influencing Factors on a Pull-Off Adhesion Test of Organic Coatings
    Kambhampati, Srikanth
    Cao, Qing
    Ghodkay, Varun
    Farhat, Hanan
    Pojtanabuntoeng, Thunyaluk
    CORROSION, 2023, 79 (06) : 683 - 691
  • [28] Effects of contact geometry on pull-off force measurements with a colloidal probe
    Yang, Seungho
    Zhang, Huan
    Nosonovsky, Michael
    Chungt, Koo-Hyun
    LANGMUIR, 2008, 24 (03) : 743 - 748
  • [29] Effects of Nanosilver and Heat Treatment on the Pull-Off Strength of Sealer-Clear Finish in Solid Wood Species
    Taghiyari, Hamid R.
    Ilies, Dorina Camelia
    Antov, Petar
    Vasile, Grama
    Majidinajafabadi, Reza
    Lee, Seng Hua
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [30] The Effects of Surface Roughness, Adhesive Type, and Veneer Species on Pull-Off Strength of Laminated Medium Density Fibreboard
    Kureli, Ihsan
    Doganay, Sefer
    BIORESOURCES, 2015, 10 (01): : 1293 - 1303