The impact of urgency of repair on outcomes following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury

被引:4
|
作者
Yadavalli, Sai Divya [1 ]
Summers, Steven P. [2 ]
Rastogi, Vinamr [3 ]
Romijn, Anne -Sophie C. [4 ]
Marcaccio, Christina L. [1 ]
Lagazzi, Emanuele [5 ]
Zettervall, Sara L. [6 ]
Starnes, Benjamin W. [6 ]
Verhagen, Hence J. M. [1 ,3 ]
Schermerhorn, Marc L. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovascular Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Med, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Emergency Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Trauma & Emergency Surg, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, 110 Francis St,Ste 5B, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Thoracic injury; Blunt thoracic aortic injury; TEVAR; SVS aortic injury grading; DELAYED REPAIR; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY; TRAUMA; STROKE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.042
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Current societal recommendations regarding the timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) vary. Prior studies have shown that elective repair was associated with lower mortality after TEVAR for BTAI. However, these studies lacked data such as Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) aortic injury grades and TEVAR-related postoperative outcomes. Therefore, we used the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, which includes relevant anatomic and outcome data, to examine the outcomes following urgent/emergent (<= 24 hours) vs elective TEVAR for BTAI. Methods: Patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI between 2013 and 2022 were included, excluding those with SVS grade 4 aortic injuries. We included covariates such as age, sex, race, transfer status, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin, comorbidities, medication use, SVS aortic injury grade, coexisting injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale, and prior aortic surgery in a regression model to compute propensity scores for assignment to urgent/emergent or elective TEVAR. Perioperative outcomes and 5 -year mortality were evaluated using inverse probability -weighted logistic regression and Cox regression, also adjusting for left subclavian artery revascularization/occlusion and annual center and physician volumes. Results: Of 1016 patients, 102 (10%) underwent elective TEVAR. Patients who underwent elective repair were more likely to undergo revascularization of the left subclavian artery (31% vs 7.5%; P < .001) and receive intraoperative heparin (94% vs 82%; P = .002). After inverse probability weighting, there was no association between TEVAR timing and perioperative mortality (elective vs urgent/emergent: 3.9% vs 6.6%; odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-4.7; P = .90) and 5 -year mortality (5.8% vs 12%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.21-4.3; P > .9).Compared with urgent/emergent TEVAR, elective repair was associated with lower postoperative stroke (1.0% vs 2.1%; adjusted OR [aOR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.94; P = .044), even after adjusting for intraoperative heparin use (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92; P = .042). Elective TEVAR was also associated with lower odds of failure of extubation immediately after surgery (39% vs 65%; aOR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.090.35; P < .001) and postoperative pneumonia (4.9% vs 11%; aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.91; P = .031), but comparable odds of any postoperative complication as a composite outcome and reintervention during index admission. Conclusions: Patients with BTAI who underwent elective TEVAR were more likely to receive intraoperative heparin. Perioperative mortality and 5 -year mortality rates were similar between the elective and emergent/urgent TEVAR groups. Postoperatively, elective TEVAR was associated with lower ischemic stroke, pulmonary complications, and prolonged hospitalization. Future modifications in society guidelines should incorporate the current evidence supporting the use of elective TEVAR for BTAI. The optimal timing of TEVAR in patients with BTAI and the factors determining it should be the subject of future study to facilitate personalized decision -making. (J Vasc Surg 2024;79:229-39.)
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endovascular thoracic aortic transection repair has equivalent survival to open repair after blunt thoracic aortic injury
    Erben, Young
    Trejo, Gerardo
    Brownstein, Adam J.
    Jean, Raymond A.
    Ziganshin, Bulat A.
    Carino, Davide
    Elefteriades, John A.
    Maung, Adrian A.
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2018, 37 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [42] Initial Outcomes of the Gore TAG Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis for Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury
    Chou, Elizabeth L.
    Lu, Eileen
    Dake, Michael D.
    Fischbein, Michael P.
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    Oderich, Gustavo
    Makaroun, Michel S.
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer M.
    Naslund, Thomas
    Suckow, Bjoern D.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Patel, Himanshu J.
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 104 : 147 - 155
  • [43] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: impact of urgency on outcome and quality of life
    Dick, Florian
    Hinder, Dominik
    Immer, Franz F.
    Savolainen, Hannu
    Do Do, Dai
    Carrel, Thierry P.
    Schmidli, Juerg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 35 (01) : 96 - 103
  • [44] Do patients with minimal blunt thoracic aortic injury require thoracic endovascular repair?
    DuBose, Joseph J.
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer
    Starnes, Benjamin
    Saqib, Naveed
    Quiroga, Elina
    Morrison, Jonathan
    Gewertz, Bruce
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2021, 90 (02): : 384 - 387
  • [45] Impact of age and urgency on survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    De Rango, Paola
    Isernia, Giacomo
    Simonte, Gioele
    Cieri, Enrico
    Marucchini, Alessandro
    Farchioni, Luca
    Verzini, Fabio
    Lenti, Massimo
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [46] Endovascular repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury: A safe and durable procedure
    Abad, Cipriano
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 148 (06): : 2962 - 2962
  • [47] Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: Endovascular Repair Is Now the Standard Discussion
    Magnotti, Louis
    Fabian, Timothy
    Meredith, J. Wayne
    Thompson, Errington
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    Dent, Daniel
    Scalea, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) : 610 - 612
  • [48] Endovascular Repair Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury in Adolescent: A Case Series
    Deng, Zhihe
    Zhong, Yaoyang
    Zou, Liping
    Bi, Guoshan
    Chen, Jie
    Dai, Xianpeng
    Hu, Jun
    Xiong, Guozuo
    Deng, Liming
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024,
  • [49] Midterm Results Following Endovascular Repair of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries
    Lioupis, Christos
    MacKenzie, Kent S.
    Corriveau, Marc-Michel
    Obrand, Daniel I.
    Abraham, Cherrie Z.
    Steinmetz, Oren K.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 46 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [50] Early vs Delayed Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury
    Marcaccio, Christina
    Dumas, Ryan P.
    Huang, Yanlan
    Wang, Grace J.
    Holena, Daniel N.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (06) : 185S - 186S