Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis

被引:24
|
作者
Allchin, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minnesota Ctr Philosophy Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
consensus; credibility; disinformation; epistemic dependence; expertise; gatekeeping; misinformation; science education; SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE; TRUST; CLASSROOM; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21746
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific misinformation and disinformation, proliferating via the internet and social media, are now significant problems. Proposed solutions vary substantially. Here, I describe a set of prospective benchmarks-10 competencies-that seem essential for reorienting science education to address the challenge. They include, first, elements of epistemic motivation, including basic epistemological beliefs about "constructed" knowledge, adopting a posture of respect for empirical evidence, and an understanding of our epistemic dependence on experts. Second, the benchmarks include perspectives and skills in interacting with media sources. These include how to identify experts, how to identify credible gatekeepers, how to recognize deceptive strategies, and how to deal with social networks and technology. Finally, the competencies include self-regulation, such as acknowledging the cognitive dispositions that bias our thinking (especially about information that challenges our pre-existing beliefs) and the counter-balancing role of consensus. I hope that these competency goals can function as a concrete target in guiding discussion of perhaps more complete or more nuanced approaches to the current crisis. With such competencies clearly and explicitly articulated, teachers will be better positioned to develop effective classroom strategies to nurture the relevant competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 274
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE SCIENCE IS IN CRISIS?
    Mendes Ottoni, Maximo Alessandro
    Xavier, Elton Dias
    Nunes Ottoni, Soraya Cavalcante
    POLEM!CA, 2015, 15 (01):
  • [42] Crisis management competencies: A university stakeholder perspective
    Pharaoh, Courtley D.
    Visser, D. J.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [43] SCIENCE IN CRISIS
    MULVEY, J
    PHYSICS WORLD, 1991, 4 (01) : 15 - 15
  • [44] The crisis of science
    Satyendra Nath Bose
    Resonance, 2005, 10 (12) : 232 - 241
  • [45] SCIENCE AND CRISIS
    MANLEY, JH
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 1959, 15 (03) : 114 - 117
  • [46] The Crisis of Science
    Bose, Satyendra Nath
    RESONANCE-JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2005, 10 (12): : 232 - 241
  • [47] Ten Reflections on Today’s Crisis
    Savio R.
    Development, 2017, 60 (3-4) : 222 - 226
  • [48] Library and information science competencies revisited
    Buttlar, L
    DuMont, R
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 1996, 37 (01) : 44 - 62
  • [49] The Philippines: Ten years after the crisis
    Debuque-Gonzales, Margarita
    Gochoco-Bautista, Maria Socorro
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2007, 38 (04): : 72 - +
  • [50] 'CRISIS ON CONSHELF TEN' - HUGHES,M
    HAYES, S
    TLS-THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT, 1975, (3836): : 1052 - 1052