Differences in Automated External Defibrillator Types in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Treated by Police First Responders

被引:2
|
作者
Krammel, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Eichelter, Jakob [1 ,3 ]
Gatterer, Constantin [1 ,4 ]
Lobmeyr, Elisabeth [5 ]
Neymayer, Marco [1 ,6 ]
Grassmann, Daniel [2 ]
Holzer, Michael [6 ]
Sulzgruber, Patrick [1 ,4 ]
Schnaubelt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] PULS Austrian Cardiac Arrest Awareness Assoc, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Emergency Med Serv MA70, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Surg, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 2, Div Cardiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[5] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Internal Med 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Emergency Med, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
automated external defibrillator; out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; basic life support; police; first responder; EUROPEAN RESUSCITATION; SURVIVAL; EDUCATION; OUTCOMES; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; PAUSE;
D O I
10.3390/jcdd10050196
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Police first responder systems also including automated external defibrillation (AED) has in the past shown considerable impact on favourable outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). While short hands-off times in chest compressions are known to be beneficial, various AED models use different algorithms, inducing longer or shorter durations of crucial timeframes along basic life support (BLS). Yet, data on details of these differences, and also of their potential impact on clinical outcomes are scarce. Methods: For this retrospective observational study, patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac origin and initially shockable rhythm treated by police first responders in Vienna, Austria, between 01/2013 and 12/2021 were included. Data from the Viennese Cardiac Arrest Registry and AED files were extracted, and exact timeframes were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in the 350 eligible cases in demographics, return of spontaneous circulation, 30-day survival, or favourable neurological outcome between the used AED types. However, the Philips HS1 and -FrX AEDs showed immediate rhythm analysis after electrode placement (0 [0-1] s) and almost no shock loading time (0 [0-1] s), as opposed to the LP CR Plus (3 [0-4] and 6 [6-6] s, respectively) and LP 1000 (3 [2-10] and 6 [5-7] s, respectively). On the other hand, the HS1 and -FrX had longer analysis times of 12 [12-16] and 12 [11-18] s than the LP CR Plus (5 [5-6] s) and LP 1000 (6 [5-8] s). The duration from when the AED was turned on until the first defibrillation were 45 [28-61] s (Philips FrX), 59 [28-81] s (LP 1000), 59 [50-97] s (HS1), and 69 [55-85] s (LP CR Plus). Conclusion: In a retrospective analysis of OHCA-cases treated by police first responders, we could not find significant differences in clinical patient outcomes concerning the respective used AED model. However, various differences in time durations (e.g., electrode placement to rhythm analysis, analysis duration, or AED turned on until first defibrillation) along the BLS algorithm were seen. This opens up the question of AED-adaptations and tailored training methods for professional first responders.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automated external defibrillator and operator performance in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Zijlstra, Jolande A.
    Bekkers, Loes E.
    Hulleman, Michiel
    Beesems, Stefanie G.
    Koster, Rudolph W.
    RESUSCITATION, 2017, 118 : 140 - 146
  • [2] Use of automated external defibrillator by first responders in out of hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled trial
    van Alem, AP
    Vrenken, RH
    de Vos, R
    Tijssen, JGP
    Koster, RW
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7427): : 1312 - 1315
  • [3] Failure of cardiac rhythm analysis by automated external defibrillator in an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Cmorej, P. Ch.
    Smrzova, E.
    Mach, J.
    ANESTEZIOLOGIE A INTENZIVNI MEDICINA, 2018, 29 (03): : 135 - 138
  • [4] CARDIAC-ARREST TREATED WITH A NEW AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR BY OUT-OF-HOSPITAL 1ST RESPONDERS
    WEAVER, WD
    COPASS, MK
    HILL, DL
    FAHRENBRUCH, C
    HALLSTROM, AP
    COBB, LA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 57 (13): : 1017 - 1021
  • [5] Refining Automated External Defibrillator Signage to Improve Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival
    Kovoor, Joshua G.
    Bacchi, Stephen
    Gupta, Aashray K.
    Stretton, Brandon
    Page, Gregory J.
    Kovoor, Pramesh
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2023, 32 (08): : E51 - E52
  • [6] Automated External Defibrillator Use After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest at Recreational Facilities
    Kolkailah, Ahmed A.
    Chan, Paul S.
    Li, Qiang
    Uzendu, Anezi
    Khan, Mirza S.
    Girotra, Saket
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 184 (02) : 218 - 220
  • [7] Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Van Alem, AP
    Sanou, BT
    Koster, RW
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 729 - 729
  • [8] Automated external defibrillator use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Current limitations and solutions
    Delhomme, Clemence
    Njeim, Mario
    Varlet, Emilie
    Pechmajou, Louis
    Benameur, Nordine
    Cassan, Pascal
    Derkenne, Clement
    Jost, Daniel
    Lamhaut, Lionel
    Marijon, Eloi
    Jouven, Xavier
    Karam, Nicole
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2019, 112 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [9] Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    van Alem, AP
    Sanou, BT
    Koster, RW
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [10] Automated external defibrillator: Rhythm analysis and defibrillation on paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Menant, Emma
    Lavignasse, Delphine
    Menetre, Sarah
    Didon, Jean-Philippe
    Jouven, Xavier
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2025, 22