Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics

被引:5
|
作者
Meyer, John M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Calif Polytech State Univ, Dept Polit, Arcata, CA USA
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ, Dept Polit, Arcata, CA 95521 USA
关键词
climate politics; counterknowledge; elites; experts; populism; science; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1177/00323217231160370
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies' ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of "anti-populist" responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 861
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条