Impact of ventricular arrhythmia management on suboptimal biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:2
|
作者
van den Bruck, Jan-Hendrik [1 ,2 ]
Middeldorp, Melissa [3 ,4 ]
Sultan, Arian [1 ,2 ]
Scheurlen, Cornelia [1 ,2 ]
Seuthe, Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Woermann, Jonas [1 ,2 ]
Filipovic, Karlo [1 ,2 ]
Kadhim, Kadhim [3 ,4 ]
Sanders, Prashanthan [3 ,4 ]
Steven, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Lueker, Jakob [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Med, Dept Electrophysiol, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Cologne, Kerpener Str 62, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Heart Rhythm Disorders, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Catheter ablation of ventricular ectopy; Optimization of Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Catheter ablation for Optimization of biventricular pacing; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; HEART-FAILURE; ASSOCIATION; DEFIBRILLATOR; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; BEATS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-022-01259-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients' prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. Methods In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP <= 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. Results We included 64 consecutive patients (73 +/- 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 +/- 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1%+/- 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range - 5 to +47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range -5 to +10.7%); p= < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 +/- 13.4%. Conclusion In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Permanent His bundle pacing to replace biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Scherlag, Benjamin J.
    Papaila, Alexa
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2017, 109 : 77 - 79
  • [22] Cardiac resynchronization therapy by biventricular pacing:: How many patients with left ventricular dysfunction are eligible?
    Yang, A
    Wolpert, C
    Schimpf, R
    Schulz, T
    Krause, U
    Jung, W
    Herwig, S
    Jeong, KM
    Omran, H
    Lewalter, T
    Lüderitz, B
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2002, 127 (43) : 2259 - 2263
  • [23] Identification of the optimal left ventricular pacing site in biventricular cardiac resynchronization
    Helm, RH
    Daya, SK
    Chen, J
    Tunin, R
    Zviman, MM
    Nazarian, S
    Halperin, H
    Berger, R
    Kass, DA
    Lardo, AC
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 429 - 429
  • [24] Triple site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Lenarczyk, R.
    Kowalski, O.
    Kukulski, T.
    Szulik, M.
    Pruszkowska-Skrzep, P.
    Zielinska, T.
    Pluta, S.
    Sredniawa, B.
    Musialik-Lydka, A.
    Kalarus, Z.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2007, 28 : 294 - 294
  • [25] How to Choose Between His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Gaurav A. Upadhyay
    Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2019, 13
  • [26] Loss of Biventricular Pacing and Inappropriate Therapy by a Cardiac Resynchronization Implantable Defibrillator
    Pap, Robert
    Klausz, Gergely
    Balazs, Tibor
    Saghy, Laszlo
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (08): : 1030 - 1031
  • [27] A prospective, randomized comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular and left ventricular pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Gold, Michael R.
    Niazi, Imran
    Giudici, Michael
    Leman, Robert B.
    Sturdivant, J. Lacy
    Kim, Michael H.
    Yu, Yinghong
    HEART RHYTHM, 2011, 8 (05) : 685 - 691
  • [28] Left bundle branch pacing set to outshine biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Batta, Akash
    Hatwal, Juniali
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (04): : 186 - 190
  • [29] Left ventricular versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The plot thickens in this tale of two modes
    Kass, D
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 15 (12) : 1348 - 1349
  • [30] Cardiac resynchronization therapy and the relationship of percent biventricular pacing to symptoms and survival
    Hayes, David L.
    Boehmer, John P.
    Day, John D.
    Gilliam, F. R., III
    Heidenreich, Paul A.
    Seth, Milan
    Jones, Paul W.
    Saxon, Leslie A.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2011, 8 (09) : 1469 - 1475