Systemic risk and idiosyncratic networks among global systemically important banks

被引:6
|
作者
Cui, Xue [1 ]
Yang, Lu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, 3688 Nanhai Ave, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
conditional granger causality; idiosyncratic contagion; network analysis; risk spillover; systemic risk; CONTAGION EVIDENCE; CONNECTEDNESS; INTERCONNECTEDNESS;
D O I
10.1002/ijfe.2674
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this article, we investigate the role played by idiosyncratic networks in systemic risk transmission among global systemically important banks. To construct idiosyncratic networks, we employ the conditional Granger causality approach and find they are unstable in the short term and stable in the long term. Additionally, we visualise dynamic idiosyncratic networks and confirm that their evolutionary pattern is similar to that of systemic risk. Moreover, we further explore systemic risk and idiosyncratic networks at an individual level and determine that in-degree and in-strength measures negatively influence systemic risk. This indicates that a well-connected idiosyncratic network in the banking system is prone to risk spillover and cause idiosyncratic contagion. The results of the network analysis indicate that global banking idiosyncratic networks are a complex system and can serve as a valuable reference for investors and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 75
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A FEATURE OF THE APPROACHES TO IDENTIFY SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT BANKS
    Stegniienko, M. O.
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 2 (19): : 42 - 50
  • [32] Heterogeneous dependence of the FinTech Index with Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs)
    Zeng, Hongjun
    Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul
    Lucey, Brian
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 64
  • [33] Analyzing the role of sustainable investor in global systemically important banks and less significant institutions
    Porzio, Claudio
    Battaglia, Francesca
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2024, 68
  • [34] FROM THE CAPM WITH SYSTEMIC RISK TO THE DESIGNATION OF THE SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
    Garibal, Jean-Charles
    Kouontchou, Patrick
    Maillet, Bertrand
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2018, 69 (03): : 443 - 475
  • [35] Climate risk and the systemic risk of banks: A global perspective
    Wu, Baohui
    Wen, Fenghua
    Zhang, Yun
    Huang, Zhijian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 95
  • [36] Interconnectedness and systemic risk: A comparative study based on systemically important regions
    Fang, Lei
    Cheng, Jiang
    Su, Fang
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2019, 54 : 147 - 158
  • [37] Systemically Important Banks in Indonesia: Findings From Multivariate GARCH Conditional Value at Risk
    Arief, Usman
    Husodo, Zaafri Ananto
    INDONESIAN CAPITAL MARKET REVIEW, 2019, 11 (02) : 119 - 129
  • [38] Identifying the systemically important banks of Turkey with the CoVaR method
    Civan, Zehra
    Simsek, Gulhayat Golbasi
    Akay, Ebru Caglayan
    HELIYON, 2020, 6 (09)
  • [39] An Assessment Methodology for Domestic Systemically Important Banks in Australia
    Braemer, Patrick
    Gischer, Horst
    AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 46 (02) : 140 - 159
  • [40] The Empirical Analysis of Recognition Systemically Important Banks in China
    Chen Shaoping
    DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES, 2013, : 37 - 42