Contextual defeasible reasoning framework for heterogeneous knowledge sources

被引:1
|
作者
ul Haque, Hafiz Mahfooz [1 ]
Akhtar, Salwa Muhammad [2 ]
Uddin, Ijaz [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lahore, Dept Software Engn, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Univ Lahore, Dept Comp Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[3] City Univ Sci & Informat Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Peshawar, Pakistan
来源
关键词
Context-awareness; Contextual Defeasible Reasoning; Multi-agent System; Multi-context System; Semantic Knowledge Sources; ONTOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1002/cpe.6446
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Recent years have witnessed the rapid advances of smart computing paradigms in a ubiquitous environment. These paradigms make human life much easier, comfortable, secure and hassle free. In a smart computing environment, it is a fact that human users interact with the systems dynamically with or without human intervention using different modalities. The core emphasize is given on the intelligent systems that run in a highly decentralized environment with different communication mechanism. Literature highlighted numerous formalisms to bridge the communication modalities for different knowledge sources. Among others, Multi-context System (MCS) has been advocated as one of the most suitable formalism to interlink different contexts (domains) dynamically in the distributed environment. However, interaction of these knowledge sources sometime may produce inconsistent and conflicting results. In this work, we presents a contextual defeasible reasoning based multi-agent formalism to handle the inconsistency issues. This framework relies on the semantic knowledge sources which allow us to model context-aware non-monotonic reasoning agents to infer the desired goals using the extracted rules from the ontologies and handles inconsistencies using conflicting contextual information. We illustrate the validity and correctness of the proposed formalism using a simple case study of a smart healthcare system with the prototypal implementation of the system.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning
    Vo, QB
    Foo, NY
    Thurbon, J
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2005, 44 (1-2) : 87 - 119
  • [42] Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals
    Lupita Estefania Gazzo Castañeda
    Markus Knauff
    Memory & Cognition, 2016, 44 : 499 - 517
  • [43] Editorial: Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning
    Booth, Richard
    Casini, Giovanni
    Klarman, Szymon
    Richard, Gilles
    Varzinczak, Ivan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2019, 112 : 1 - 3
  • [44] Efficient defeasible reasoning systems
    Maher, MJ
    Rock, A
    Antoniou, G
    Billington, D
    Miller, T
    12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 384 - 392
  • [45] Euler Diagrams for Defeasible Reasoning
    Takemura, Ryo
    DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION AND INFERENCE, DIAGRAMS 2020, 2020, 12169 : 289 - 304
  • [46] Defeasible Reasoning plus Partial Models: A Formal Framework for the Methodology of Research Programs
    Tohme, Fernando
    Delrieux, Claudio
    Bueno, Otavio
    FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2011, 16 (01) : 47 - 65
  • [47] Openproof - A Flexible Framework for Heterogeneous Reasoning
    Barker-Plummer, Dave
    Etchemendy, John
    Liu, Albert
    Murray, Michael
    Swoboda, Nik
    DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION AND INFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5223 : 347 - +
  • [48] Preferential Tableaux for Contextual Defeasible ALC
    Britz, Katarina
    Varzinczak, Ivan
    AUTOMATED REASONING WITH ANALYTIC TABLEAUX AND RELATED METHODS, TABLEAUX 2019, 2019, 11714 : 39 - 57
  • [49] Contextual rational closure for defeasible ALC
    Britz, Katarina
    Varzinczak, Ivan
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 87 (1-2) : 83 - 108
  • [50] Contextual Agent Deliberation in Defeasible Logic
    Dastani, Mehdi
    Governatori, Guido
    Rotolo, Antonino
    Song, Insu
    van der Torre, Leendert
    AGENT COMPUTING AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2009, 5044 : 98 - +