US County-Level Variation in Preterm Birth Rates, 2007-2019

被引:6
|
作者
Khan, Sadiya S. [1 ,2 ]
Vaughan, Adam S. [3 ]
Harrington, Katharine [2 ]
Seegmiller, Laura [1 ]
Huang, Xiaoning [1 ]
Pool, Lindsay R. [2 ]
Davis, Matthew M. [4 ]
Allen, Norrina B. [2 ]
Capewell, Simon [5 ]
O'Flaherty, Martin [5 ]
Miller, Gregory E. [6 ,7 ]
Mehran, Roxana [8 ]
Vogel, Birgit [8 ]
Kershaw, Kiarri N. [2 ]
Lloyd-Jones, Donald M. [1 ,2 ]
Grobman, William A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med, 680 N Lake Shore Dr,14-002, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Heart Dis & Stroke Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pediat, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth, Liverpool, England
[6] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Dept Psychol, Evanston, IL USA
[8] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[9] Ohio State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HEART-DISEASE MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS; TEMPORAL TRENDS; UNITED-STATES; PREVENTION; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46864
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Importance Preterm birth is a leading cause of preventable neonatal morbidity and mortality. Preterm birth rates at the national level may mask important geographic variation in rates and trends at the county level.ObjectiveTo estimate age-standardized preterm birth rates by US county from 2007 to 2019.Design, Setting, and Participants This serial cross-sectional study used data from the National Center for Health Statistics composed of all live births in the US between 2007 and 2019. Data analyses were performed between March 22, 2022, and September 29, 2022.Main Outcomes and Measures Age-standardized preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation) and secondarily early preterm birth (<34 weeks' gestation) rates by county and year calculated with a validated small area estimation model (hierarchical bayesian spatiotemporal model) and percent change in preterm birth rates using log-linear regression models.Results Between 2007 and 2019, there were 51 044 482 live births in 2383 counties. In 2007, the national age-standardized preterm birth rate was 12.6 (95% CI, 12.6-12.7) per 100 live births. Preterm birth rates varied significantly among counties, with an absolute difference between the 90th and 10th percentile counties of 6.4 (95% CI, 6.2-6.7). The gap between the highest and lowest counties for preterm births was 20.7 per 100 live births in 2007. Several counties in the Southeast consistently had the highest preterm birth rates compared with counties in California and New England, which had the lowest preterm birth rates. Although there was no statistically significant change in preterm birth rates between 2007 and 2019 at the national level (percent change, -5.0%; 95% CI, -10.7% to 0.9%), increases occurred in 15.4% (95% CI, 14.1%-16.9%) of counties. The absolute and relative geographic inequalities were similar across all maternal age groups. Higher quartile of the Social Vulnerability Index was associated with higher preterm birth rates (quartile 4 vs quartile 1 risk ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.31-1.36), which persisted across the study period. Similar patterns were observed for early preterm birth rates.Conclusions and Relevance In this serial cross-sectional study of county-level preterm and early preterm birth rates, substantial geographic disparities were observed, which were associated with place-based social disadvantage. Stability in aggregated rates of preterm birth at the national level masked increases in nearly 1 in 6 counties between 2007 and 2019.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] US county-level agricultural crop production typology
    Courtney R. Hammond Wagner
    Meredith T. Niles
    Eric D. Roy
    BMC Research Notes, 12
  • [42] County-Level Income Inequality, Social Mobility, and Deaths of Despair in the US, 2000-2019
    Kuo, Chun-Tung
    Kawachi, Ichiro
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (07)
  • [43] Marriage and County-level Crime Rates: A Research Note
    Rocque, Michael
    Posick, Chad
    Barkan, Steven E.
    Paternoster, Ray
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2015, 52 (01): : 130 - 145
  • [44] METHODS FOR ANALYZING COUNTY-LEVEL MORTALITY-RATES
    STEVENSON, JM
    OLSON, DR
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1993, 12 (3-4) : 393 - 401
  • [45] Association of Tropical Cyclones With County-Level Mortality in the US
    Parks, Robbie M.
    Benavides, Jaime
    Anderson, G. Brooke
    Nethery, Rachel C.
    Navas-Acien, Ana
    Dominici, Francesca
    Ezzati, Majid
    Kioumourtzoglou, Marianthi-Anna
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (10): : 946 - 955
  • [46] Cancer rates not explained by smoking: a county-level analysis
    Douglas J. Myers
    Polly Hoppin
    Molly Jacobs
    Richard Clapp
    David Kriebel
    Environmental Health, 19
  • [47] Immigration and environmental emissions: A US county-level analysis
    Squalli, Jay
    POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 30 (06) : 247 - 260
  • [48] ASSESSMENT OF COUNTY-LEVEL CHARACTERISTICS AND CANCER CLINICAL TRIAL RATES IN THE US, 2010-2021
    Gu, N.
    Li, M.
    Suk, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S178 - S178
  • [49] A spatial analysis of county-level variation in hospitalization rates for low back problems in North Carolina
    Joines, JD
    Hertz-Picciotto, I
    Carey, TS
    Gesler, W
    Suchindran, C
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (12) : 2541 - 2553
  • [50] US County-Level Trends in Mortality Rates for Major Causes of Death, 1980-2014
    Dwyer-Lindgren, Laura
    Bertozzi-Villa, Amelia
    Stubbs, Rebecca W.
    Morozoff, Chloe
    Kutz, Michael J.
    Huynh, Chantal
    Barber, Ryan M.
    Shackelford, Katya A.
    Mackenbach, Johan P.
    van Lenthe, Frank J.
    Flaxman, Abraham D.
    Naghavi, Mohsen
    Mokdad, Ali H.
    Murray, Christopher J. L.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2385 - 2401