Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Private Wells in Flood-Impacted Areas

被引:2
|
作者
Gitter, Anna [1 ]
Boellstorff, Diane E. E. [2 ]
Mena, Kristina D. D. [1 ]
Gholson, Drew M. M. [3 ]
Pieper, Kelsey J. J. [4 ]
Chavarria, Carlos A. A. [1 ]
Gentry, Terry J. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Texas A&M AgriLife Extens Serv, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Natl Ctr Alluvial Aquifer Res NCAAR, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[4] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家环境保护局; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
microbial risk assessment; private wells; water quality; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; DOSE-RESPONSE MODELS; DRINKING-WATER; HEALTH-RISK; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; PATHOGEN REDUCTION; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM; VIRUSES; SEWAGE; CONTAMINATION;
D O I
10.3390/w15030469
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Microbial contamination of private well systems continues to be a prominent drinking water concern, especially for areas impacted by floodwaters. Hurricane Harvey deposited nearly 60 inches of rain, resulting in extensive flooding throughout Houston, Texas, and neighboring counties. A sampling campaign to test private wells for fecal indicator bacteria was initiated in the weeks following flooding. Escherichia coli concentrations measured in wells were utilized in a quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate the risk of infection for both drinking water and indirect ingestion exposure scenarios. Derived reference pathogen doses indicated that norovirus (1.60 x 10(-4) to 8.32 x 10(-5)) and Cryptosporidium (2.37-7.80 x 10(-6)) posed the greatest health risk via drinking, with median health risk estimates exceeding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's modified daily risk threshold of 1 x 10(-6) for a gastrointestinal infection. Bathing (1.78 x 10(-6)), showering (4.32 x 10(-7)), and food/dish washing (1.79 x 10(-6)) were also identified to be exposure pathways of health concern. A post-flood microbial risk assessment of private wells in the Gulf Coast has not previously been conducted. Estimating these health risks can provide scientifically supported guidance regarding which well water practices are safest, especially when well water quality is unknown. Developing this guidance is critical as coastal communities experience increased vulnerability to flooding.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [22] Quantitative microbial risk assessment - An Australian perspective
    Vanderlinde, P
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 1998, 50 (12): : 626 - 628
  • [23] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Stratev, Deyan
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [24] 'Omics' technologies in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Brul, S.
    Bassett, J.
    Cook, P.
    Kathariou, S.
    McClure, P.
    Jasti, P. R.
    Betts, R.
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 12 - 24
  • [25] Sensitivity analysis in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Zwietering, MH
    van Gerwen, SJC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 58 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [26] Application of a complete and quantitative tool for flood risk analysis in urban areas
    Escuder-Bueno, I.
    Castillo-Rodriguez, J. T.
    Petaccia, G.
    Perales-Momparler, S.
    RISK ANALYSIS, DAM SAFETY, DAM SECURITY AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 113 - 120
  • [27] Comprehensive flood risk assessment in highly developed urban areas
    Dong, Boliang
    Xia, Junqiang
    Wang, Xiaojie
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 648
  • [28] Statewide Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Waterborne Viruses, Bacteria, and Protozoa in Public Water Supply Wells in Minnesota
    Burch, Tucker R.
    Stokdyk, Joel P.
    Rice, Nancy
    Anderson, Anita C.
    Walsh, James F.
    Spencer, Susan K.
    Firnstahl, Aaron D.
    Borchardt, Mark A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 56 (10) : 6315 - 6324
  • [29] A Framework for Flood Risk Analysis and Benefit Assessment of Flood Control Measures in Urban Areas
    Li, Chaochao
    Cheng, Xiaotao
    Li, Na
    Du, Xiaohe
    Yu, Qian
    Kan, Guangyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (08)
  • [30] A QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR NATURAL GAS STORAGE WELLS
    Dessein, Thomas
    Ayton, Brent
    Fraser, Alex
    Smith, Shawn
    Shironishi, Mari
    Sera, Travis
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 1, 2022,