Evaluation of Three Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Canine Brucellosis

被引:5
|
作者
Perletta, Fabrizia [1 ]
Di Pancrazio, Chiara [1 ]
Rodomonti, Diamante [1 ]
Di Febo, Tiziana [1 ]
Luciani, Mirella [1 ]
Krasteva, Ivanka Marinova [1 ]
Maggetti, Marta [1 ]
Profeta, Francesca [1 ]
Salini, Romolo [1 ]
De Massis, Fabrizio [1 ]
Sacchini, Flavio [1 ]
Tittarelli, Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Abruzzo & Molise, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
关键词
Brucella canis; diagnosis; serological methods; AGGLUTINATION-TEST; LABORATORY EXPOSURES; INFECTION; DOGS; ANTIBODIES; OUTBREAK; ANTIGEN; SMOOTH; KENNEL; PCR;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11092162
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis, is an infectious disease affecting dogs and wild Canidae. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and laboratory testing is crucial for a definitive diagnosis. Various serological methods have been described, but their accuracy is uncertain due to limited validation studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the performances of three serological tests for the diagnosis of B. canis in comparison with bacterial isolation (gold standard), in order to establish a protocol for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis. A panel of sera from naturally infected dogs (n = 61), from which B. canis was isolated, and uninfected dogs (n = 143), negative for B. canis isolation, were tested using microplate serum agglutination (mSAT), complement fixation performed using the Brucella ovis antigen (B. ovis-CFT), and a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). The sensitivity and specificity of the three serological methods were, respectively, the following: 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 92.3 (95% CI 86.7-95.1%) for mSAT; 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 96.5 (95% CI 92.1-98.2%) for B. ovis-CFT; 98.4% (95% CI 91.3-99.4%) and 99.3 (95% CI 96.2-99.8%) for IFAT. The use in of the three methods in parallel, combined with bacterial isolation and molecular methods, could improve the diagnosis of the infection in dogs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF 3 SEROLOGICAL TESTS IN DIAGNOSIS OF CAPRINE-BRUCELLOSIS
    FALADE, S
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1978, 24 (03) : 376 - 377
  • [32] A COMPARISON OF STANDARD SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS IN CANADA
    STEMSHORN, BW
    FORBES, LB
    EAGLESOME, MD
    NIELSEN, KH
    ROBERTSON, FJ
    SAMAGH, BS
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE MEDICINE-REVUE CANADIENNE DE MEDECINE COMPAREE, 1985, 49 (04): : 391 - 394
  • [33] Evaluation of Serologic tests for diagnosis of Brucellosis
    Zvizdic, Sukrija
    Velic, Ramiz
    Bajrovic, Tarik
    Velic, Lejla
    Hamzic, Sadeta
    Tandir, Salih
    Musanovic, Jasmin
    Kudumovic, Azra
    HEALTHMED, 2010, 4 (01): : 152 - 157
  • [34] Diagnosis of brucellosis in the equines by serological tests and PCR: A clinical report
    Shome, R.
    Gangadar, N. L.
    Rao, K. Narayana
    Shome, B. R.
    Prabhudas, K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2011, 81 (02): : 137 - 139
  • [35] COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DIFFERENT SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS
    DAZA, RM
    DAMASO, D
    MORENO, M
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 1981, 76 (02): : 57 - 60
  • [36] Evaluation of three serological tests for brucellosis in naturally infected cattle using latent class analysis
    Muma, J. B.
    Toft, N.
    Oloya, J.
    Lund, A.
    Nielsen, K.
    Samui, K.
    Skjerve, E.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 125 (1-2) : 187 - 192
  • [37] SEROLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS IN CATTLE - COMPARISON BETWEEN (IGG) ELISA AND CLASSICAL SEROLOGICAL TESTS
    TRAP, D
    GAUMONT, R
    DEVELOPMENTS IN BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION, 1984, 56 : 451 - 463
  • [38] Evaluation of chimeric proteins for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle
    Bulashev, Aitbay K.
    Ingirbay, Bakytkali K.
    Mukantayev, Kanatbek N.
    Syzdykova, Alfiya S.
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2021, 14 (08) : 2187 - 2196
  • [39] Evaluation of immunocomb in comparison with other serological tests in ovine brucellosis
    Çetinkaya, B
    Öngör, H
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2000, 147 (22) : 632 - 634
  • [40] Assessment of serological tests for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis
    da Silva, Denise Amaro
    Madeira, Maria de Fatima
    Abrantes, Tuanne Rotti
    de Lima Barbosa Filho, Carlos Jose
    Figueiredo, Fabiano Borges
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 195 (02): : 252 - 253