Comparing Photovoltaic Power Prediction: Ground-Based Measurements vs. Satellite Data Using an ANN Model

被引:9
|
作者
Hajjaj, Charaf [1 ]
El Ydrissi, Massaab [2 ]
Azouzoute, Alae [3 ,4 ]
Oufadel, Ayoub [2 ]
El Alani, Omaima [2 ]
Boujoudar, Mohamed [5 ]
Abraim, Mounir
Ghennioui, Abdellatif
机构
[1] Cadi Ayyad Univ, Higher Sch Technol Essaouira, Lab Appl Sci Environm & Sustainable Dev, BP 383, Essaouira, Morocco
[2] Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah Univ, Lab Signals Syst & Components, Fes 30000, Morocco
[3] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, PV Mat Reliabil & Durabil Grp, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Fac Sci, Equipe Mecan Fluides, Lab Mecan Energet, BP 717,BV Mohamed 6, Oujda 60000, Morocco
[5] Green Energy Pk, R206, Ben Guerir, Morocco
来源
IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 06期
关键词
Temperature measurement; Satellites; Data models; Meteorology; Wind speed; Regression tree analysis; Predictive models; Artificial neural network (ANN); environmental variables; forecasting; photovoltaic (PV) power; response surface methodology (RSM) model; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SOLAR; IRRADIANCE; OUTPUT; CLASSIFICATION; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3306827
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of photovoltaic (PV) power output is crucial for assessing the feasibility of early-stage projects in relation to specific site weather conditions. While various mathematical models have been used in the past for PV power prediction, most of them only consider irradiance and ambient temperature, neglecting other important meteorological parameters. In this article, a 1-year dataset from a high-precision meteorological station at the Green Energy Research facility is utilized, along with electrical parameters from a polycrystalline silicon c-Si PV module exposed during the study period, to forecast PV power. In addition, the accuracy of using satellite data for PV power forecasting is investigated, considering the growing trend of its utilization in recent research. Regression techniques, such as linear regression with interaction, tree regression, Gaussian process regression, ensemble learning for regression, response surface methodology, SVM cubic, and artificial neural network (ANN), are employed for PV power prediction, using both ground measurement data and satellite data. Comparatively lower accuracies are observed when using satellite data across all regression methods, in contrast to the higher accuracies achieved with ground-based measurements. Notably, the Gaussian process regression method demonstrates high accuracy (R-2 = 0.25 for satellite data and R-2 = 0.94 for ground-based data). Furthermore, the ANN approach further enhances the accuracy of PV power forecasting, yielding R-2 = 0.42 for satellite data and R-2 = 0.96 for ground-based data. These findings emphasize the need for caution when relying on satellite data for PV power forecasting, even when employing advanced ANN approaches. It underscores the importance of considering ground-based measurements for more reliable and accurate predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1006
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of total ozone data between satellite and ground-based measurements at Zhongshan and Syowa stations in Antarctica
    BIAN Lingen
    LIN Zhong
    ZHANG Dongqi
    ZHENG Xiangdong
    LU Longhua
    Advances in Polar Science, 2012, 23 (04) : 196 - 203
  • [42] Evaluation of the potential of MODIS satellite data to predict vegetation phenology in different biomes: An investigation using ground-based NDVI measurements
    Hmimina, G.
    Dufrene, E.
    Pontailler, J. -Y
    Delpierre, N.
    Aubinet, M.
    Caquet, B.
    de Grandcourt, A.
    Burban, B.
    Flechard, C.
    Granier, A.
    Gross, P.
    Heinesch, B.
    Longdoz, B.
    Moureaux, C.
    Ourcival, J. -M.
    Rambal, S.
    Saint Andre, L.
    Soudani, K.
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 132 : 145 - 158
  • [43] Comparison of GOME-2 UVA Satellite Data to Ground-Based Spectroradiometer Measurements at a Subtropical Site
    Parisi, Alfio V.
    Downs, Nathan
    Turner, Joanna
    King, Rachel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (06): : 3145 - 3149
  • [44] Comparison of GOME-2 UVA Satellite Data to Ground-Based UVA Measurements in South Africa
    du Preez, D. Jean
    Parisi, Alfio, V
    Millar, Danielle A.
    Bencherif, Hassan
    Wright, Caradee Y.
    PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 2020, 96 (06) : 1342 - 1349
  • [45] REVISED GLOBAL-MODEL OF THERMOSPHERE WINDS USING SATELLITE AND GROUND-BASED OBSERVATIONS
    HEDIN, AE
    BIONDI, MA
    BURNSIDE, RG
    HERNANDEZ, G
    JOHNSON, RM
    KILLEEN, TL
    MAZAUDIER, C
    MERIWETHER, JW
    SALAH, JE
    SICA, RJ
    SMITH, RW
    SPENCER, NW
    WICKWAR, VB
    VIRDI, TS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1991, 96 (A5) : 7657 - 7688
  • [47] Photovoltaic Power Prediction of Meteorological Based on Data Drive and Mechanism Model
    Luo, Shanna
    Peng, Kaixiang
    Hu, Changbin
    Li, Xuecheng
    2023 35TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC, 2023, : 1368 - 1373
  • [48] GROUND-BASED AND SATELLITE-BASED METEO-DATA FOR SOLAR THERMAL POWER-STATIONS IN JORDAN
    DURISCH, W
    KELLER, J
    HOFER, B
    BULGHERONI, W
    BRACK, M
    RIEGRAF, H
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS, 1991, 24 (1-4): : 333 - 347
  • [49] Aerosol Measurements over India: Comparison of MAX-DOAS Measurements with Ground-based (AERONET) and Satellite-based (MODIS) Data
    Mali, Prithviraj
    Biswas, Mriganka Sekhar
    Beirle, Steffen
    Wagner, Thomas
    Hulswar, Shrivardhan
    Inamdar, Swaleha
    Mahajan, Anoop S.
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [50] Dust impact on surface solar irradiance assessed with model simulations, satellite observations and ground-based measurements
    Kosmopoulos, Panagiotis G.
    Kazadzis, Stelios
    Taylor, Michael
    Athanasopoulou, Eleni
    Speyer, Orestis
    Raptis, Panagiotis I.
    Marinou, Eleni
    Proestakis, Emmanouil
    Solomos, Stavros
    Gerasopoulos, Evangelos
    Amiridis, Vassilis
    Bais, Alkiviadis
    Kontoes, Charalabos
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2017, 10 (07) : 2435 - 2453