Misrecognitions of Victimhood: Discretionary Power of Street-level Bureaucrats in Humanitarian Visas

被引:0
|
作者
Goehrung, Ryan [1 ]
Castellano, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Polit Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS; MIGRATION CONTROL; IMMIGRATION; LAW; ORGANIZATION; CHALLENGES; PROTECTION; DISPUTES; WORKERS; FRENCH;
D O I
10.1017/lsi.2023.31
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Humanitarian visas provide one of few potential pathways to citizenship for foreign nationals victimized within the United States and are an important aspect of immigration law. Yet one form of humanitarian visas-T nonimmigrant status (T visa)-has received scant attention in the socio-legal studies literature. "T visas" were designed to aid survivors of human trafficking and, though the US government estimates that tens of thousands of individuals are trafficked in the United States every year, only 15 percent of the five thousand T visas available annually have been granted since the program's inception in 2002. Why are T visas such an underutilized form of immigration relief? Drawing on twenty in-depth interviews with immigration lawyers, law enforcement personnel, and non-governmental organization service providers routinely involved in T visa applications, we find that the low rate of applications and approvals is driven by a combination of structural barriers and expansive discretion of key actors in the legal process to interpret and apply the law, which results in a narrow and often misinformed construction of victimhood. We add to the literature on the discretionary power of street-level bureaucrats to shape the law and determine how it is applied with considerable consequences for survivors of trafficking.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1221
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Client Status on Street-Level Bureaucrats' Identity and Informal Accountability
    Pivoras, Saulius
    Kaselis, Mindaugas
    PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2019, 21 (02) : 182 - 194
  • [42] "They Are Underpaid and Understaffed": How Clients Interpret Encounters with Street-Level Bureaucrats
    Barnes, Carolyn Y.
    Henly, Julia R.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (02) : 165 - 181
  • [43] Lost in translation: how street-level bureaucrats condition Union solidarity
    Thierry, Jessica Sampson
    Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg
    JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2018, 40 (06) : 819 - 834
  • [44] How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform.
    Brucker, Debra
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 36 (01): : 117 - 119
  • [45] Street-level bureaucrats' attitudes towards the Finnish labour market allowance
    Kallio, Johanna
    Saarinen, Arttu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL POLICY, 2014, 34 (11-12) : 817 - 834
  • [46] International Office Professionals: An Example of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Higher Education
    Bulut-Sahin, Betul
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [47] Social Workers in a Modernising Welfare State: Professionals or Street-Level Bureaucrats?
    Trappenburg, Margo
    Kampen, Thomas
    Tonkens, Evelien
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 50 (06): : 1669 - 1687
  • [48] What motivates street-level bureaucrats to implement the reforms of elected politicians?
    Lee, Don S.
    Park, Soonae
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2021, 49 (01): : 141 - 160
  • [49] Behavior and performance of street-level bureaucrats: a study at the Federal Highway Police
    da Silva, Marcelo Rodrigues
    Vieira, Daniel Pires
    Lotta, Gabriela
    Neto, Joao Mendes Rocha
    REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2024, 58 (03):
  • [50] Betwixt agency and accountability: re-visioning street-level bureaucrats
    Gupta, Priyanshu
    Thakur, Manish
    Chakrabarti, Bhaskar
    COMMONWEALTH JOURNAL OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE, 2022, (26): : 94 - 113