Misrecognitions of Victimhood: Discretionary Power of Street-level Bureaucrats in Humanitarian Visas

被引:0
|
作者
Goehrung, Ryan [1 ]
Castellano, Rachel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Polit Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
TRAFFICKING VICTIMS; MIGRATION CONTROL; IMMIGRATION; LAW; ORGANIZATION; CHALLENGES; PROTECTION; DISPUTES; WORKERS; FRENCH;
D O I
10.1017/lsi.2023.31
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Humanitarian visas provide one of few potential pathways to citizenship for foreign nationals victimized within the United States and are an important aspect of immigration law. Yet one form of humanitarian visas-T nonimmigrant status (T visa)-has received scant attention in the socio-legal studies literature. "T visas" were designed to aid survivors of human trafficking and, though the US government estimates that tens of thousands of individuals are trafficked in the United States every year, only 15 percent of the five thousand T visas available annually have been granted since the program's inception in 2002. Why are T visas such an underutilized form of immigration relief? Drawing on twenty in-depth interviews with immigration lawyers, law enforcement personnel, and non-governmental organization service providers routinely involved in T visa applications, we find that the low rate of applications and approvals is driven by a combination of structural barriers and expansive discretion of key actors in the legal process to interpret and apply the law, which results in a narrow and often misinformed construction of victimhood. We add to the literature on the discretionary power of street-level bureaucrats to shape the law and determine how it is applied with considerable consequences for survivors of trafficking.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1221
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Discretionary Power of Street-Level Bureaucrats From the Perspective of Illusio
    Crosby, Andrew
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2024,
  • [2] STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS: THEORETICHAL FRAMEWORK
    Carausan, Mihaela, V
    DISCOURSE AS A FORM OF MULTICULTURALISM IN LITERATURE AND COMMUNICATION - SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2015, : 574 - 590
  • [3] What Can Reform Street-Level Bureaucrats' Unwarranted Discretionary Behaviors? Principles? Principals? Or Both?
    Carroll, Deborah A.
    Yeo, Jungwon
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2024, 54 (03): : 242 - 254
  • [4] Street-level Bureaucrats and Their Role in Public Policy
    Horak, Pavel
    Horakova, Marketa
    SOCIOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 45 (02): : 369 - 395
  • [5] Are street-level bureaucrats compelled or enticed to cope?
    Nielsen, Vibeke Lehmann
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (04) : 861 - 889
  • [6] Street-Level Bias: Examining Factors Related to Street-Level Bureaucrats' State or Citizen Favoritism
    Gershgoren, Sagi
    Cohen, Nissim
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2023, 53 (3-4): : 115 - 133
  • [7] Street-level bureaucrats: tensions and challenges in online placemaking
    Breek, Pieter
    Eshuis, Jasper
    Hermes, Joke
    JOURNAL OF PLACE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (04) : 357 - 373
  • [8] Street-level bureaucrats and the governance of unaccompanied migrant children
    Edlins, Mariglynn
    Larrison, Jennica
    PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 35 (04) : 403 - 423
  • [9] Street-level bureaucrats and the social construction of environmental control
    Fineman, S
    ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1998, 19 (06) : 953 - 974
  • [10] Street-Level Bureaucrats in a Catch-All Bureaucracy
    Trappenburg, Margo
    Kampen, Thomas
    Tonkens, Evelien
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2022, 54 (10) : 2021 - 2047