Integrating public perceptions of proximity and quality in the modelling of urban green space access

被引:12
|
作者
Phillips, Amy [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Plastara, Dimitra [3 ]
Khan, Ahmed Z. [2 ]
Canters, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Geog, Cartog & GIS Res Grp, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Bldg Architecture & Town Planning BATir Dept, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Spatial Planning & Dev, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[4] Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
关键词
Urban green spaces; Urban green space accessibility; Urban green space quality; PPGIS; Green space equity; Environmental justice; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH-CARE; ACCESSIBILITY; PARKS; CITIES; DISPARITIES; ATTRACTIVENESS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104875
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Access to urban green space (UGS) is associated with a number of physical and social benefits. Recognizing the importance of UGS access for people's wellbeing, several methods have been proposed to model UGS accessibility and highlight areas underserviced by UGS. However, existing methodologies have several limitations. Models often make use of universal, normative maximum travel distances, which may not reflect the distances people actually travel to reach UGS they regularly visit. Additionally, many of these analyses do not consider UGS quality, which will largely influence use and experience of these spaces and may act as a pull factor affecting the distance people are willing to travel to visit a UGS. Those methods that do integrate quality often rely on proxies, such as size or number of amenities, and fail to consider perceived quality. To address these limitations, we propose a methodology that integrates user perception and the actual distance people are prepared to travel into a quality-accessibility (QA) analysis applied at the building block scale. Information on travel distance and quality are gathered from a public participation GIS survey conducted in the Brussels Capital Region. The results of the analysis highlight inequalities in access to specific, essential UGS experiences throughout the region. Insights provided by this analysis can help planners prioritize interventions to improve access to experiences provided by UGS in parts of the city where interventions are most needed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Promoting Environmental Justice Through Urban Green Space Access: A Synopsis
    Jennings, Viniece
    Gaither, Cassandra Johnson
    Gragg, Richard Schulterbrandt
    ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, 2012, 5 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [42] Quality ofr life and inequitable access to public space in Bogota
    Mayorga Henao, Josd Mario
    Garcia Garcia, Diva M.
    DOCUMENTS D ANALISI GEOGRAFICA, 2019, 65 (01): : 69 - 92
  • [43] Predicting context-sensitive urban green space quality to support urban green infrastructure planning
    Kajosaari, Anna
    Hasanzadeh, Kamyar
    Fagerholm, Nora
    Nummi, Pilvi
    Kuusisto-Hjort, Paula
    Kytta, Marketta
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2024, 242
  • [44] Biodiverse perennial meadows have aesthetic value and increase residents' perceptions of site quality in urban green-space
    Southon, Georgina E.
    Jorgensen, Anna
    Dunnett, Nigel
    Hoyle, Helen
    Evans, Karl L.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2017, 158 : 105 - 118
  • [45] Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: implications for urban planning across the city region
    Douglas, Owen
    Russell, Paula
    Scott, Mark
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 62 (04) : 626 - 646
  • [46] Positive perceptions of green and open space as predictors of neighbourhood quality of life: Implications for urban planning across the city region
    Douglas, Owen
    Russell, Paula
    Scott, Mark
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2022, 37 (01) : 214 - 214
  • [47] Improving Traffic-Flow Prediction Using Proximity to Urban Features and Public Space
    Rajha, Rawan
    Shiode, Shino
    Shiode, Narushige
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [48] Development of the urban green space quality assessment tool (RECITAL)
    Knobel, Pablo
    Dadvand, Payam
    Alonso, Lucia
    Costa, Luis
    Espanol, Maria
    Maneja, Roser
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2021, 57
  • [49] Evaluation method for measurement of accessibility in urban public green space planning
    Li, Bo
    Song, Yun
    Yu, Kongjian
    Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2008, 44 (04): : 618 - 624
  • [50] Urban green space disparities: Implications of environmental injustice for public health
    Bressane, Adriano
    Pinto, Joao Pedro da Cunha
    Medeiros, Liliam Cesar de Castro
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2024, 99