Multimodal language in child-directed versus adult-directed speech

被引:3
|
作者
Kandemir, Songul [1 ]
Ozer, Demet [1 ]
Aktan-Erciyes, Asli [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kadir Has Univ, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Kadir Has Univ, TR-34083 Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
Audience design; multimodal language; adult-directed speech; child-directed speech; CONVERSATIONAL HAND GESTURES; RECIPIENT DESIGN; OLDER-ADULTS; COMMUNICATION; MOTHERESE; SPEAKERS; RECALL; PREFERENCE; SPEAKING; YOUNGER;
D O I
10.1177/17470218231188832
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Speakers design their multimodal communication according to the needs and knowledge of their interlocutors, phenomenon known as audience design. We use more sophisticated language (e.g., longer sentences with complex grammatical forms) when communicating with adults compared with children. This study investigates how speech and co-speech gestures change in adult-directed speech (ADS) versus child-directed speech (CDS) for three different tasks. Overall, 66 adult participants (M-age = 21.05, 60 female) completed three different tasks (story-reading, storytelling and address description) and they were instructed to pretend to communicate with a child (CDS) or an adult (ADS). We hypothesised that participants would use more complex language, more beat gestures, and less iconic gestures in the ADS compared with the CDS. Results showed that, for CDS, participants used more iconic gestures in the story-reading task and storytelling task compared with ADS. However, participants used more beat gestures in the storytelling task for ADS than CDS. In addition, language complexity did not differ across conditions. Our findings indicate that how speakers employ different types of gestures (iconic vs beat) according to the addressee's needs and across different tasks. Speakers might prefer to use more iconic gestures with children than adults. Results are discussed according to audience design theory.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 728
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Liquid deletion in French child-directed speech
    Peperkamp, Sharon
    Hegde, Monica
    Carbajal, Maria Julia
    INTERSPEECH 2019, 2019, : 3574 - 3578
  • [42] Pet-directed speech draws adult dogs' attention more efficiently than Adult-directed speech
    Jeannin, Sarah
    Gilbert, Caroline
    Amy, Mathieu
    Leboucher, Gerard
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [43] Infants' expectations about the recipients of infant-directed and adult-directed speech
    Soley, Gaye
    Sebastian-Galles, Nuria
    COGNITION, 2020, 198
  • [44] Description of Locomotion Events: Language-Specific Patterns in Child-Directed Speech
    Marklova, Anna
    Panfilova, Elena
    Mertins, Barbara
    WORD-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINGUISTIC ASSOCIATION, 2023, 69 (04): : 339 - 361
  • [45] Word Learning in Infant- and Adult-Directed Speech
    Ma, Weiyi
    Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick
    Houston, Derek M.
    Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy
    LANGUAGE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 7 (03) : 185 - 201
  • [46] Global Properties of the Phonological Networks in Child and Child-Directed Speech
    Carlson, Matthew T.
    Bane, Max
    Sonderegger, Morgan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, : 97 - 109
  • [47] Connective frequencies in child-directed texts A corpus analysis in comparison to theorized orders of connective acquisition and to connective frequencies in adult-directed texts
    Tellings, Agnes E. J. M.
    de Vries, Bart Penning
    WRITTEN LANGUAGE AND LITERACY, 2020, 23 (01): : 59 - 91
  • [48] Pet-directed speech draws adult dogs’ attention more efficiently than Adult-directed speech
    Sarah Jeannin
    Caroline Gilbert
    Mathieu Amy
    Gérard Leboucher
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [49] The Narrative Past Inflection in Sesotho Child and Child-Directed Speech
    Riedel, Kristina
    Sarvasy, Hannah
    Demuth, Katherine
    FRONTIERS IN COMMUNICATION, 2019, 4
  • [50] Pronouns Predict Verb Meanings in Child-Directed Speech
    Laakso, Aarre
    Smith, Linda
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2004, : 767 - 772