Multi-criteria Valuation for Sustainable Autonomous Microgrid Planning: a Comparative Analysis of Technology Mix with Different MADM Techniques

被引:5
|
作者
Thakkar, Nishant [1 ]
Paliwal, Priyanka [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Bhopal 462003, MP, India
关键词
Microgrid; MADM; Optimization; Planning; Rank aggregation; RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM; DECISION-MAKING; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; SELECTION; ELECTRIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; NATIONS; MODEL; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s40998-023-00615-8
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate combination of generation/storage technologies is elementary for the planning of a reliable and sustainable autonomous microgrid (AMG). The determination of technology mix (TM) has been acknowledged by several researchers. However, the focus has been either on component sizing for an AMG or on its evaluation based on different criteria. This paper provides integration of sizing and evaluation using multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) techniques in one structure. It is a challenge to decide on a suitable MADM technique amidst the wide range reported in literature. In order to address this issue, a comparative analysis has been carried out using eight different MADM techniques-TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE II, WSM, WPM, WASPAS, EDAS and CODAS. The final result is obtained based on rank aggregation to facilitate enhanced analysis, and 25 priority sequences (PS) have been formulated based on four primary criteria and 11 sub-criteria. The proposed formulation has been applied for an AMG located in Jaisalmer, India. For determining the appropriate TM, combinations of five technologies consisting of PVA, wind turbine (WT), biomass technology (BT), diesel generator (DG), and battery storage (BS) have been considered. The optimal component sizes for each TM are obtained using the butterfly-PSO. Thereafter, analysis of each TM was carried out using different MADM approaches. The results from four MADM techniques (TOPSIS, VIKOR, EDAS, PROMETHEE II) indicate that PVA-WT-BS is the most appropriate combination. However, WPM and WASPAS assigned first rank to PVA-BS, while WSM and CODAS allocated first rank to PVA-WT-BT. The final aggregated rank obtained through Borda count suggests that PVA-WT-BS renders optimal and sustainable planning of an AMG.
引用
收藏
页码:1283 / 1306
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Normalization Techniques in Holistic Sustainability Assessment for Engineering Applications
    Malefaki, Sonia
    Markatos, Dionysios
    Filippatos, Angelos
    Pantelakis, Spiros
    AEROSPACE, 2025, 12 (02)
  • [42] Multi-criteria evaluation and priority analysis of different types of existing power plants in Iran: An optimized energy planning system
    Katal, Fatemeh
    Fazelpour, Farivar
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 120 : 163 - 177
  • [43] An Exploratory Analysis for the Selection and Implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technology by Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study
    Nath S.
    Sarkar B.
    Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C, 2017, 98 (04) : 493 - 506
  • [44] Integrating multi-criteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: Application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon
    Nsafon, Benyoh Emmanuel Kigha
    Butu, Hemen Mark
    Owolabi, Abdulhameed Babatunde
    Roh, Jong Wook
    Suh, Dongjun
    Huh, Jeung-Soo
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2020, 37
  • [45] Multi-criteria analysis in Artemia farming site selection for sustainable desert ecosystems planning and management (case study: Siahkouh Playa, Iran)
    A. R. Keshtkar
    Z. Oros
    Sh. Mohammadkhan
    S. Eagdari
    H. Paktinat
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [46] Multi-criteria analysis in Artemia farming site selection for sustainable desert ecosystems planning and management (case study: Siahkouh Playa, Iran)
    Keshtkar, A. R.
    Oros, Z.
    Mohammadkhan, Sh.
    Eagdari, S.
    Paktinat, H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (16)
  • [47] Towards Sustainable Development: Ranking of Soil Erosion-Prone Areas Using Morphometric Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques
    Shekar, Padala Raja
    Mathew, Aneesh
    Ben Hasher, Fahdah Falah
    Mehmood, Kaleem
    Zhran, Mohamed
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [48] A comparative study of different methods of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) with spatial reference to select of suitable sites for treated wastewater of irrigated perimeters
    Rihab, Riahi
    Gannouni, Sonia
    Rebai, Noamen
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 10 (04)
  • [49] Multi-criteria comparative analysis of the pressure drop on coal gangue fly-ash slurry at different parts along an L-shaped pipeline
    Wang, Defeng
    Jiao, Dengwu
    Cheng, Zhanbo
    Shi, Qingwen
    Mischo, Helmut
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [50] Multi-criteria comparative analysis of the pressure drop on coal gangue fly-ash slurry at different parts along an L-shaped pipeline
    Defeng Wang
    Dengwu Jiao
    Zhanbo Cheng
    Qingwen Shi
    Helmut Mischo
    International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 2023, 10