Sustainability Fingerprint-guiding companies in anticipating the sustainability direction in early design

被引:7
|
作者
Hallstedt, Sophie Isaksson [1 ]
Villamil, Carolina [1 ]
Lovdah, Josefin [1 ]
Nylander, Johanna Wallin [2 ]
机构
[1] Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Strateg Sustainable Dev, SE-37179 Karlskrona, Sweden
[2] GKN Aerosp Engine, Trollhattan, Sweden
关键词
Ecodesign; Sustainable design; Measure; Sustainability; Early design; Sustainable product development; PRODUCT DESIGN; EARLY PHASES; LIFE-CYCLE; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; INNOVATION; IMPLEMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the early phases of design of new products, information necessary to guide and assess sustainability is typically incomplete. Manufacturers risk discovering the unfavorable sustainability impact too late to redirect the development. The purpose of this study is to search and review methods to anticipate the sustainability performance of new products in the early stages of the innovation process, and, together with a case company in the aeroengine manufacturing business, to develop and propose a systematic approach to anticipate sustainability performance. Following a literature review of 51 methods and research-based proposals, only five covered the social-, ecological-, and economic sustainability dimensions in the early phases of product development. Through an action research-based approach, a qualitative sustainability measurement tool, the Sustainability Fingerprint tool, was developed. This tool allows the development team in a company to systematically derive a sustainability performance from a set of criteria unique to the targeted product and/or product portfolio that is to be designed, from a set of scientifically well-established sustainability principles. The tool was applied in six different industry cases at the company, by the design teams and independent of any influence of the researchers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to learn about the usefulness, usability, and applicability of the tool. It was concluded that the Sustainability Fingerprint tool has no equivalent in the literature and was considered useful for the case company during early phase design for two main reasons. Firstly, the tool is tailor-made with defined companyspecific sustainability criteria that represent the most important sustainability aspects to assess. Secondly, the support tool can be used also in later phases, thereby supporting a continued innovation process. It allows designers to anticipate a sustainability performance of the solution in: the development of sustainable innovations; comparison and down-selection of alternative solutions; sustainability assessments of the product portfolio to identify improvement measures; and sustainability assessment of current products to identify sustainability hotspots. Further research will include companies from other industrial sectors and will focus on adding digital support, improved practical instructions, and, integration to existing processes and established support tools in companies today. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 442
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] A circular approach to foster additive manufacturing early design stages sustainability: a methodological proposal
    Faveto, Alberto
    Lombardi, Franco
    Chiabert, Paolo
    Segonds, Frederic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2023, 18 (2): : 815 - 836
  • [32] Identifying influential architectural design variables for early-stage building sustainability optimization
    Wang, Xinyue
    Teigland, Robin
    Hollberg, Alexander
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 252
  • [33] Investigation of Leveraging BIM Standards to Facilitate Sustainability Evaluations from Early Stages of Design
    Ramaji, Issa J.
    Gultekin-Bicer, Pelin
    Crowley, Raphael W.
    Lambert, J. David
    COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2017: INFORMATION MODELLING AND DATA ANALYTICS, 2017, : 175 - 183
  • [34] Meeting Design Supporting Sustainability in Early Planning Practice: A Combination of 'Hard and Soft' Characteristics
    Grosse, Elise
    Femenias, Paula
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [35] Assessing the environmental sustainability of early stage design for bioprocesses under uncertainties: An analysis of glycerol bioconversion
    Gargalo, Carina L.
    Cheali, Peam
    Posada, John A.
    Carvalho, Ana
    Gernaey, Krist V.
    Sin, Gurkan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 : 1245 - 1260
  • [36] Sustainability evaluation for early design (SEED) framework for energy use, embodied carbon, cost, and daylighting assessment
    Bernett, Allison
    Kral, Katharina
    Dogan, Timur
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION, 2021, 14 (02) : 95 - 115
  • [37] Sustainability as a Value-Adding Concept in the Early Design Phases? Insights from Stimulated Ideation Sessions
    Maccioni, Lorenzo
    Borgianni, Yuri
    Rotini, Federico
    SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING 2017, 2017, 68 : 888 - 897
  • [38] Sustainability Assessment during Early Stage Chemical Process Design: Comparing Two Different Methods of Synthesizing Noroxymorphone
    Egger, Gerd
    Waniek, Katharina
    Schöggl, Josef-Peter
    Kappe, C. Oliver
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 2024, 12 (52): : 18666 - 18678
  • [39] Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry
    Schoeggl, Josef-Peter
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    Hofer, Dietmar
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 1602 - 1617
  • [40] Evaluation of EHS hazard and sustainability metrics during early process design stages using principal component analysis
    Banimostafa, Alireza
    Papadokonstantakis, Stavros
    Hungerbuehler, Konrad
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2012, 90 (01) : 8 - 26