The forage type (barley silage vs. straw) and forage inclusion rate act independently suggesting that using forages with greater dietary uNDF can stimulate the frequency of reticulo-ruminal contractions and reduce gastrointestinal permeability with no effect on ruminal pH. Increasing forage inclusion rate stabilized ruminal pH, increased rumination time, stimulated reticulo-ruminal contractions, and decreased indicators of systemic inflammation. This study evaluated the effects of forages (BarS vs. STR) that differ in the uNDF concentration and FI rate on ruminal fermentation, total tract barrier function, reticulo-ruminal motility, and blood metabolites of beef heifers. Six ruminally cannulated Hereford x Simmental heifers (699 +/- 69.1 kg BW) were used in a 6 x 6 Latin square (26 d periods) with a 2 x 3 factorial treatment arrangement. However, 1 heifer was removed from the study after period 2 due to health problems unrelated to treatment, resulting in an incomplete 6 x 6 Latin square design. Barley grain-based diets were formulated using BarS or wheat STR to alter uNDF (7.1% vs. 8.5% DM) with FI rates of 5%, 10%, or 15% of DM. There were limited interactions between the forage type and FI. DM intake was not affected (P >= 0.10) by forage type or FI. Use of STR vs. BarS increased uNDF intake (P < 0.001). Increasing FI increased (P < 0.001) uNDF intake for those fed 15% forage. Ruminal pH was not affected (P >= 0.10) by forage type; however, cattle fed 5% FI had lesser (P = 0.017) mean ruminal pH and maximum pH (P = 0.018) than those fed 10% and 15% of forage. The total SCFA concentration was not affected by forage type (P = 0.84) but cattle fed the 5% FI rate had lesser (P < 0.001) molar proportion of acetate when compared with cattle fed 10% and 15% forage. Increasing the FI rate decreased the molar proportion of propionate (P < 0.001). Feeding STR relative to BarS decreased (P = 0.041) the reticulo-ruminal contraction duration. In contrast, cattle fed the 10% and 15% FI rates had a greater (P = 0.028) contraction frequency with lower (P = 0.048) contraction area than those fed 5% forage. Plasma glucose, serum insulin, and serum amyloid A were not affected by forage type or FI rate (P >= 0.10). Cattle fed 15% forage had lesser (P = 0.040) concentration of serum haptoglobin when compared with cattle fed 5% or 10% forage. In conclusion, forage type used to affect the dietary uNDF concentration, and FI rate act independently suggesting that the provision of STR to increase uNDF reduces reticulo-ruminal contraction duration and total tract permeability but may not affect ruminal pH. Increasing the FI increased dietary uNDF, stabilized ruminal pH, stimulated more frequent reticulo-ruminal contractions, and may decrease the permeability of the gastrointestinal tract and systemic inflammation. Lay Summary As a strategy to improve performance, feedlot cattle are often fed diets containing a high proportion of grain with minimal forage. However, diets with insufficient fiber may predispose cattle to nutritional disorders, such as ruminal acidosis, which leads to poor performance and increases production costs. Given the growing concern regarding minimal fiber requirement, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of forages differing in undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF; barley silage [BarS] vs. straw [STR]) concentration and forage inclusion (FI) rate (5%, 10%, or 15% of dietary dry matter [DM]) on reticulo-ruminal motility and fermentation, total tract barrier function, and blood metabolites of beef cattle. The inclusion of STR increased uNDF intake and rumination rate, but decreased reticulo-ruminal contraction duration, with no effect on ruminal pH and total short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration. Decreasing the FI rate decreased uNDF intake, ruminating time, ruminal pH, and reticular contraction frequency, but increased the molar proportion of propionate and concentration of serum haptoglobin. In conclusion, forage type and FI rate act independently suggesting that providing forages that increase dietary uNDF may stimulate the frequency of reticulo-ruminal contractions without affecting ruminal pH. However, increasing FI inadvertently increased dietary uNDF, stabilized ruminal pH, increased rumination time, stimulated ruminal contractions, and decreased indicators of systemic inflammation.
