Effect of physically effective neutral detergent fiber and undigested neutral detergent fiber on eating behavior, ruminal fermentation and motility, barrier function, blood metabolites, and total tract digestibility in finishing cattle

Providing physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF), based on forages greater than 4-mm, provides a greater effect than measurement of undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF) alone in terms of effects on rumination time, ruminal fermentation, and ruminal motility. However, uNDF alone affected feeding behavior and reduced digestibility. As such, characterization of peNDF and uNDF may be useful when formulating finishing diets. This study evaluated the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) and undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF) on eating behavior, ruminal fermentation and motility, barrier function, blood metabolites, and total tract nutrient digestibility for finishing cattle. Six Simmental heifers (668 +/- 28.4 kg BW) were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square (21 d periods) balanced for carry-over effects. Treatments included a control (CON; Table 1) with no forage peNDF and minimal uNDF (peNDF: 0.0%, and uNDF: 4.88 +/- 0.01; 95.15% barley grain, 4.51% vitamin and mineral supplement, and 0.34% urea on a DM basis). Pelleted wheat straw (PELL) was included at 10% of dietary DM by replacing barley grain to provide added uNDF but no forage peNDF (peNDF: 0.00%, and uNDF: 6.78 +/- 0.02%). Finally, chopped wheat straw (STR) was included as a replacement for pelleted wheat straw to provide forage peNDF and uNDF (peNDF: 1.74 +/- 0.06%, and uNDF: 6.86 +/- 0.03%). Dry matter intake was not affected (P = 0.93) by treatments. Cattle fed CON spent less time ruminating (P = 0.010) and had less meals/d (P = 0.035) when compared with cattle fed STR, with those fed PELL being intermediate but not different from other treatments. Cattle fed CON had lesser ruminal pH (P = 0.020), and a greater duration that pH was < 5.5 (P = 0.020) as compared to cattle fed STR, with those fed PELL being intermediate but not different. Cattle fed CON and PELL had greater total short-chain fatty acid concentration (P = 0.003) and molar proportion of propionate (P < 0.001) when compared with cattle fed STR. Cattle fed STR had greater (P = 0.010) total ruminal pool size when compared with cattle fed CON and PELL. Cattle fed CON had greater (P = 0.043) duration between ruminal contractions when compared with cattle fed STR, with those fed PELL being intermediate. Cattle fed CON had greater serum amyloid A (P = 0.003) and haptoglobin (P < 0.001) concentration when compared with the other treatments. Cattle fed CON had greater dry matter (P < 0.001) digestibility when compared with the other treatments. In conclusion, inclusion of PELL and STR impacted eating behavior, but only STR affected ruminal fermentation, ruminal motility, systemic inflammation, and total tract nutrient digestibility in finishing cattle. These results are interpreted to suggest that the combination of peNDF and uNDF may be better than uNDF alone to adequately capture biological effects of NDF in high-concentrate diets. Lay Summary Normally forages are included at minimal levels when formulating finishing cattle diets due to lower digestibility and higher operational and economic costs than concentrates. However, insufficient fiber may increase the risk of nutritional disorders such as ruminal acidosis, negatively impacting health, and consequently growth performance of feedlot cattle. An understanding of the minimum forage requirement and the constituent factors that best explain that requirement can help to promote health and performance while minimizing cost. The present study compared the effects of physically effective neutral detergent fiber (peNDF) and undigested neutral detergent fiber (uNDF) in concentrate-based finishing diets. Feeding more peNDF increased ruminating time and ruminal pH, but decreased time between ruminal contractions, total short-chain fatty acid concentration, and the molar proportion of propionate when compared with feeding a diet with minimal peNDF and uNDF. Responses to feeding uNDF with no peNDF were generally intermediate but not different from other treatments. In addition, feeding more peNDF decreased indicators of systemic inflammation and dry matter digestibility when compared with the diet with less peNDF or uNDF. In conclusion, peNDF, or at least the combination of peNDF and uNDF may be better than uNDF alone to stimulate rumination and ruminal motility, thereby stabilizing ruminal pH. Using both peNDF and uNDF may be useful in characterizing the value of fiber in finishing diets fed to feedlot cattle.