The Accuracy of Nonstandardized MELD/PELD Score Exceptions in the Pediatric Liver Allocation System

被引:4
|
作者
Ahn, Daniel J. [1 ]
Zeng, Sharon [2 ]
Pelzer, Kenley M. [3 ]
Barth, Rolf N.
Gallo, Amy [1 ,4 ]
Parker, William F. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Surg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave,MC 6076, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 5841 S Maryland Ave,MC 6076, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
MODEL; REQUESTS; CHILDREN; MELD;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0000000000004720
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. In the United States, over half of pediatric candidates receive exceptions and status upgrades that increase their allocation model of end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease (MELD/PELD) score above their laboratory MELD/PELD score. We determined whether these "nonstandardized" MELD/PELD exceptions accurately depict true pretransplant mortality risk. Methods. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified pediatric candidates (<18 y of age) with chronic liver failure added to the waitlist between June 2016 and September 2021 and estimated all-cause pretransplant mortality with mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models that treated allocation MELD/PELD and exception status as time-dependent covariates. We also estimated concordance statistics comparing the performance of laboratory MELD/PELD with allocation MELD/PELD. We then compared the proportion of candidates with exceptions before and after the establishment of the National Liver Review Board. Results. Out of 2026 pediatric candidates listed during our study period, 403 (19.9%) received an exception within a week of listing and 1182 (58.3%) received an exception before delisting. Candidates prioritized by their laboratory MELD/PELD scores had an almost 9 times greater risk of pretransplant mortality compared with candidates who received the same allocation score from an exception (hazard ratio 8.69; 95% confidence interval, 4.71-16.03; P < 0.001). The laboratory MELD/PELD score without exceptions was more accurate than the allocation MELD/PELD score with exceptions (Harrell's c-index 0.843 versus 0.763). The proportion of patients with an active exception at the time of transplant decreased significantly after the National Liver Review Board was implemented (67.4% versus 43.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusions. Nonstandardized exceptions undermine the rank ordering of pediatric candidates with chronic liver failure.
引用
收藏
页码:e247 / e256
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adoption of MELD/PELD in Argentina Improved Liver Organ Allocation for Children with Chronic Liver Disease.
    Dip, Marcelo F.
    Cejas, Nora G.
    Villamil, Federico G.
    Cervio, Guillermo L.
    Tagliafichi, Viviana
    Hansen Krogh, Daniela
    Soratti, Carlos A.
    Bisigniano, Liliana
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 : S105 - S105
  • [22] Association of PELD score with perioperative and postoperative outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation
    Julnipithawong, P.
    Tanpowpong, P.
    Puttanapitak, C.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (09) : 258 - 259
  • [23] Impact of Laboratory Variability On Liver Graft Allocation System Using MELD Score.
    Yassein, T.
    Abd el Razek, W.
    Waked, I.
    Elfert, A.
    Tanaka, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 731 - 731
  • [24] Impact of Laboratory Variability On Liver Graft Allocation System Using MELD Score.
    Yassein, T.
    Abd el Razek, W.
    Waked, I.
    Elfert, A.
    Tanaka, K.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 731 - 731
  • [25] Does the Meld/Peld Allocation Policy Correctly Balance Waiting List Outcomes of Pediatric and Adult Patients?
    Dip, Marcelo F.
    Cejas, Nora G.
    Villamil, Federico G.
    Cervio, Guillermo L.
    Tagliafichi, Viviana
    Krogh, Daniela Hansen
    Soratti, Carlos A.
    Bisigniano, Liliana
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 : S298 - S298
  • [26] DOES THE MELD/PELD ALLOCATION POLICY CORRECTLY BALANCE WAITING LIST OUTCOMES OF PEDIATRIC AND ADULT PATIENTS?
    Dip, Marcelo
    Cejas, Nora G.
    Villamil, Federico G.
    Cervio, Guillermo
    Tagliafichi, Viviana
    Krogh, Daniela H.
    Soratti, Carlos A.
    Bisigniano, Liliana
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 26 : 31 - 32
  • [27] Liver Allocation for Rare Disease: Does the MELD Score Suffice?
    Pullen, Lara C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 (12) : 3271 - 3272
  • [28] Should Canada adopt the MELD score for allocation of liver transplants?
    Burak, KW
    Meeberg, G
    Myers, RP
    Hilsden, RJ
    Swain, MG
    Wong, WW
    Fick, GH
    Bain, VG
    Kneteman, NM
    HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (04) : 322A - 322A
  • [29] Liver Allocation in Urgent MELD Score ≥30: The Italian Experience
    Trapani, S.
    Morabito, V.
    Oliveti, A.
    Peritore, D.
    Rizzo, A.
    Cacciotti, A. R.
    Gaeta, A.
    Montemurro, A.
    Rizzato, L.
    Costa, A. Nanni
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2016, 48 (02) : 299 - 303
  • [30] Meld exceptions and new predictive score of death on long waiting lists for liver transplantation
    Iacob, S.
    Gheorghe, L.
    Iacob, R.
    Gheorghe, C.
    Hrehoret, D.
    Popescu, I.
    CHIRURGIA, 2009, 104 (03) : 267 - 273