Statistical and deep learning models for reference evapotranspiration time series forecasting: A comparison of accuracy, complexity, and data efficiency

被引:9
|
作者
Ahmadi, Arman [1 ]
Daccache, Andre [1 ]
Sadegh, Mojtaba [2 ]
Snyder, Richard L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Boise State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Boise, ID 83706 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Reference Evapotranspiration; Time Series Forecasting; Deep Learning; Prediction Accuracy; Data Efficiency; Computational Cost;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2023.108424
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is an essential variable in agricultural water resources management and irrigation scheduling. An accurate and reliable forecast of ETo facilitates effective decision-making in agriculture. Although numerous studies assessed various methodologies for ETo forecasting, an in-depth multi-dimensional analysis evaluating different aspects of these methodologies is missing. This study systematically evaluates the complexity, computational cost, data efficiency, and accuracy of ten models that have been used or could potentially be used for ETo forecasting. These models range from well-known statistical forecasting models like seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) to state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) algorithms like temporal fusion transformer (TFT). This study categorizes monthly ETo time series from 107 weather stations across California according to their length to better understand the forecasting models' data efficiency. Moreover, two forecasting strategies (i.e., recursive and multi-input multi-output) are employed for machine learning and DL models, and forecasts are assessed for different multi-step horizons. Our findings show that statistical forecasting models like Holt-Winters' exponential smoothing perform almost as well as complex DL models. Unlike statistical models, DL models generally suffer from low data efficiency and perform well only when enough data is available. Importantly, although the computational costs of most DL models are higher than statistical methods, this is not the case for all. Considering computational cost, data efficiency, and forecasting accuracy, our findings point to the superiority of the neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting (N-BEATS) architecture for univariate ETo time series forecasting. Moreover, our results suggest HoltWinters and Theta methods outperform SARIMA - the most employed statistical model for ETo forecasting in the literature - in accuracy and efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning for time series forecasting: a survey
    Kong, Xiangjie
    Chen, Zhenghao
    Liu, Weiyao
    Ning, Kaili
    Zhang, Lechao
    Muhammad Marier, Syauqie
    Liu, Yichen
    Chen, Yuhao
    Xia, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2025,
  • [32] A novel approach based on combining deep learning models with statistical methods for COVID-19 time series forecasting
    Abbasimehr, Hossein
    Paki, Reza
    Bahrini, Aram
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2022, 34 (04): : 3135 - 3149
  • [33] A novel approach based on combining deep learning models with statistical methods for COVID-19 time series forecasting
    Hossein Abbasimehr
    Reza Paki
    Aram Bahrini
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2022, 34 : 3135 - 3149
  • [34] TIME-SERIES FORECASTING FOR SOME STATISTICAL MODELS
    Al Mutairi, Alya
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN STATISTICS, 2022, 78 : 83 - 92
  • [35] A comprehensive evaluation of statistical, machine learning and deep learning models for time series prediction
    Xuan, Ang
    Yin, Mengmeng
    Li, Yupei
    Chen, Xiyu
    Ma, Zhenliang
    2022 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS (CDMA 2022), 2022, : 55 - 60
  • [36] MODEL AND DATA UNCERTAINTY FOR SATELLITE TIME SERIES FORECASTING WITH DEEP RECURRENT MODELS
    Russwurm, Marc
    Ali, Mohsin
    Zhu, Xiao Xiang
    Gal, Yarin
    Koerner, Marco
    IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM, 2020, : 7025 - 7028
  • [37] A Performance Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Techniques in Learning Time Series Data
    Haviluddin
    Alfred, Rayner
    Obit, Joe Henry
    Hijazi, Mohd Hanafi Ahmad
    Ibrahim, Ag Asri Ag
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2015, 21 (10) : 3037 - 3041
  • [38] Multivariate Time Series Evapotranspiration Forecasting using Machine Learning Techniques
    Liyew, Chalachew Muluken
    Meo, Rosa
    Di Nardo, Elvira
    Ferraris, Stefano
    38TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTING, SAC 2023, 2023, : 377 - 380
  • [39] Selected Topics in Time Series Forecasting: Statistical Models vs. Machine Learning
    Tjostheim, Dag
    ENTROPY, 2025, 27 (03)
  • [40] A Comparative Multivariate Analysis of VAR and Deep Learning-Based Models for Forecasting Volatile Time Series Data
    Gopali, Saroj
    Siami-Namini, Sima
    Abri, Faranak
    Namin, Akbar Siami
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 155423 - 155436