Modelling the spatial distribution of the classification error of remote sensing data in cocoa agroforestry systems

被引:3
|
作者
Tamga, Dan Kanmegne [1 ]
Latifi, Hooman [1 ,2 ]
Ullmann, Tobias [3 ]
Baumhauer, Roland [3 ]
Thiel, Michael [1 ]
Bayala, Jules [4 ]
机构
[1] Julius Maximilians Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, Dept Remote Sensing, Oswald Kulpe Weg 86, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat Engn, Dept Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, POB 15433-19967, Tehran, Iran
[3] Julius Maximilians Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, Dept Phys Geog, D-97074 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] CIFOR ICRAF, Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR World Agroforestry ICR, Sahel 06,BP 9478, Ouagadougou 06, Burkina Faso
关键词
Cocoa mapping; Geographically weighted regression; Sentinel-1; Sentinel-2; Shannon entropy; Spatial error assessment; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10457-022-00791-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cocoa growing is one of the main activities in humid West Africa, which is mainly grown in pure stands. It is the main driver of deforestation and encroachment in protected areas. Cocoa agroforestry systems which have been promoted to mitigate deforestation, needs to be accurately delineated to support a valid monitoring system. Therefore, the aim of this research is to model the spatial distribution of uncertainties in the classification cocoa agroforestry. The study was carried out in Cote d'Ivoire, close to the Tai National Park. The analysis followed three steps (i) image classification based on texture parameters and vegetation indices from Sentinel-1 and -2 data respectively, to train a random forest algorithm. A classified map with the associated probability maps was generated. (ii) Shannon entropy was calculated from the probability maps, to get the error maps at different thresholds (0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5). Then, (iii) the generated error maps were analysed using a Geographically Weighted Regression model to check for spatial autocorrelation. From the results, a producer accuracy (0.88) and a user's accuracy (0.91) were obtained. A small threshold value overestimates the classification error, while a larger threshold will underestimate it. The optimal value was found to be between 0.3 and 0.4. There was no evidence of spatial autocorrelation except for a smaller threshold (0.2). The approach differentiated cocoa from other landcover and detected encroachment in forest. Even though some information was lost in the process, the method is effective for mapping cocoa plantations in Cote d'Ivoire.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 119
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spatial analysis of remote sensing image classification accuracy
    Comber, Alexis
    Fisher, Peter
    Brunsdon, Chris
    Khmag, Abdulhakim
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 127 : 237 - 246
  • [32] Modelling and prediction of malaria vector distribution in Bangladesh from remote-sensing data
    Rahman, A.
    Kogan, F.
    Roytman, L.
    Goldberg, M.
    Guo, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 32 (05) : 1233 - 1251
  • [33] Processing and Classification of Multichannel Remote Sensing Data
    Lukin, Vladimir
    Ponomarenko, Nikolay
    Kurekin, Andrey
    Pogrebnyak, Oleksiy
    ADVANCES IN SOFT COMPUTING, PT II, 2011, 7095 : 487 - +
  • [34] Extinction Profiles for the Classification of Remote Sensing Data
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Souza, Roberto
    Benediktsson, Jon Atli
    Zhu, Xiao Xiang
    Rittner, Leticia
    Lotufo, Roberto A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (10): : 5631 - 5645
  • [35] Swarm intelligence for classification of remote sensing data
    LIU XiaoPing1
    2 South China Sea Environment Monitor Center
    ScienceinChina(SeriesD:EarthSciences), 2008, (01) : 79 - 87
  • [36] Hierarchical fuzzy classification of remote sensing data
    Wang, Yan
    Jamshidi, Mo
    Neville, Paul
    Bales, Chandra
    Morain, Stan
    FORGING NEW FRONTIERS: FUZZY PIONEERS I, 2007, 217 : 333 - +
  • [37] Genetic programming for classification of remote sensing data
    Jan, Jihn-Fa
    Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 1998, 13 (02): : 109 - 118
  • [38] Controlled Classification of Earth Remote Sensing Data
    Asmus, V. V.
    Buchnev, A. A.
    Pyatkin, V. P.
    OPTOELECTRONICS INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA PROCESSING, 2008, 44 (04)
  • [39] Genetic programming for classification of remote sensing data
    Taiwan Lin Yeh Ko hsueh, 2 (109):
  • [40] Swarm intelligence for classification of remote sensing data
    XiaoPing Liu
    Xia Li
    XiaoJuan Peng
    HaiBo Li
    JinQiang He
    Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2008, 51 : 79 - 87