Magnetic stimulation of the sciatic nerve using an implantable high-inductance coil with low-intensity current

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Kyeong Jae [1 ]
Park, Byungwook [1 ]
Jang, Jae-Won [1 ]
Kim, Sohee [1 ]
机构
[1] Daegu Gyeongbuk Inst Sci & Technol DGIST, Dept Robot & Mechatron Engn, Daegu, South Korea
关键词
magnetic stimulation; peripheral nerve stimulation; implantable coil; low-intensity stimulation; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2552/acdcbb
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Magnetic stimulation using implantable devices may offer a promising alternative to other stimulation methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electric stimulation using implantable devices. This alternative may increase the selectivity of stimulation compared to TMS, and eliminate the need to expose tissue to metals in the body, as is required in electric stimulation using implantable devices. However, previous studies of magnetic stimulation of the sciatic nerve used large coils, with a diameter of several tens of mm, and a current intensity in the order of kA. Approach. Since such large coils and high current intensity are not suitable for implantable devices, we investigated the feasibility of using a smaller implantable coil and lower current to elicit neuronal responses. A coil with a diameter of 3 mm and an inductance of 1 mH was used as the implantable stimulator. Main results. Before in vivo experiments, we used 3D computational models to estimate the minimum stimulus intensity required to elicit neuronal responses, resulting in a threshold current above 3.5 A. In in vivo experiments, we observed successful nerve stimulation via compound muscle action potentials elicited in hind-limb muscles when the applied current was above 3.8 A, a significantly reduced current than that used in conventional magnetic stimulation. Significance. We report the feasibility of magnetic stimulation using an implantable millimeter-sized coil and low current of a few amperes to elicit neural responses in peripheral nerves. The proposed method is expected to be an alternative to TMS, with the merit of improved selectivity in stimulation, and to electrical stimulation based on implantable devices, with the merit of avoiding the exposure of conducting metals to neural tissues.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of coil current directions and waveforms on nerve excitation elicited by magnetic stimulation
    Hyodo, A
    Kobayashi, M
    Ueno, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 19, PTS 1-6: MAGNIFICENT MILESTONES AND EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES IN MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 19 : 2089 - 2091
  • [22] Noninvasive Brain Stimulation With High-Frequency and Low-Intensity Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    Boggio, Paulo Sergio
    Rocha, Martha
    Oliveira, Maira Okada
    Fecteau, Shirley
    Cohen, Roni B.
    Campanha, Camila
    Ferreira-Santos, Eduardo
    Meleiro, Alexandrina
    Corchs, Felipe
    Zaghi, Soroush
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Fregni, Felipe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 71 (08) : 992 - 999
  • [23] Intraneural Injection with Low-Current Stimulation During Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
    Robards, Christopher
    Hadzic, Admir
    Somasundaram, Lakshmanasamy
    Iwata, Takashige
    Gadsden, Jeff
    Xu, Daquan
    Sala-Blanch, Xavier
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 109 (02): : 673 - 677
  • [24] Peripheral glutamate release in the hindpaw following low and high intensity sciatic stimulation
    de Groot, J
    Zhou, ST
    Carlton, SM
    NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (03) : 497 - 502
  • [25] High-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound and microbubbles enhance nerve blockade
    Cullion, Kathleen
    Santamaria, Claudia M.
    Zhan, Changyou
    Zurakowski, David
    Sun, Tao
    Pemberton, Grant L.
    McDannold, Nathan J.
    Kohane, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2018, 276 : 150 - 156
  • [26] Neural circuit repair by low-intensity magnetic stimulation requires cellular magnetoreceptors and specific stimulation patterns
    Dufor, T.
    Grehl, S.
    Tang, A. D.
    Doulazmi, M.
    Traore, M.
    Debray, N.
    Dubacq, C.
    Deng, Z-D
    Mariani, J.
    Lohof, A. M.
    Sherrard, R. M.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (10):
  • [27] A comparison of high-versus low-intensity, high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for painful postpartum uterine contractions
    Olsen, Monika Fagevik
    Elden, Helen
    Janson, Eva Dahmen
    Lilja, Hakan
    Stener-Victorin, Elisabet
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (03) : 310 - 314
  • [28] The differences of human muscle responses to magnetic nerve stimulation with different coil current waveforms
    Kobayashi, M
    Hyodo, A
    Ueno, S
    Kurokawa, T
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 19, PTS 1-6: MAGNIFICENT MILESTONES AND EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES IN MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 19 : 1928 - 1931
  • [29] Torque gains and neural adaptations following low-intensity motor nerve electrical stimulation training
    Vitry, Florian
    Martin, Alain
    Papaiordanidou, Maria
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 127 (05) : 1469 - 1477
  • [30] The Changes of Cardiovascular Neurotransmitter Levels under Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve
    Ji, Ning
    Li, Yuanheng
    Wei, Jingling
    Huang, Lei
    Lin, Wan-Hua
    Li, Guanglin
    2023 45TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY, EMBC, 2023,