Performance investment and price decisions of two-sided platforms under multiple quality regulation strategies

被引:3
|
作者
Jing, Chang [1 ]
Ke, Hou [1 ]
Zhu, Yangpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Shiyou Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Xian 710065, Peoples R China
关键词
INTERCHANGE FEES; ECOSYSTEM; COMPLEMENTORS; BUSINESS; CROWD;
D O I
10.1002/mde.3808
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Quality regulation is an important issue in platform governance. Quality regulation strategies can be targeted either to the platform or to the complementors. Different from a large number of previous studies on a single strategy, this paper investigates the combination of several quality regulation strategies for two-sided platforms. This paper constructs a profit maximization model to explore the optimal performance investment and price decisions of the platform under multiple quality regulation strategies. Based on the existing research, this study considers the proportion of high-quality complementors on the optimal performance decision, so that the two types of quality regulation strategies, platform-oriented and complementor-oriented, can be combined. This study finds that the optimal performance investment decision is influenced by the implementation effect of other quality regulation strategies for complementors. Therefore, platform owners should combine subsidies with quality regulation strategies when making performance investments. In addition, our results demonstrate that the combination of several quality regulation strategies can eliminate the problem caused by a certain single strategy, such as free-riding and closed platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:2148 / 2158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms With Quality-Based Subsidization
    Fu, Qi
    Lyu, Gaoyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2022, 26 (04) : 526 - 551
  • [22] Price cap regulation in a two-sided market: Intended and unintended consequences
    Wang, Zhu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2016, 45 : 28 - 37
  • [23] Intertemporal Price Competition in the Two-Sided Market: Reexamining the Seesaw Principle for Startup Platforms
    Dou, Yifan
    Zhang, Xiaoyang
    Wu, D. J.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [24] Quality Selection in Two-Sided Markets: A Constrained Price Discrimination Approach
    Light, Bar
    Johari, Ramesh
    Weintraub, Gabriel
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 72 (05) : 1928 - 1957
  • [25] Optimal capacity investment decisions with two-sided fixed-capacity adjustment costs
    Ye, Qing
    Duenyas, Izak
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2007, 55 (02) : 272 - 283
  • [26] A pair of optimal reinsurance-investment strategies in the two-sided exit framework
    Landriault, David
    Li, Bin
    Li, Danping
    Li, Dongchen
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2016, 71 : 284 - 294
  • [27] Looking Beyond Membership: A Simulation Study of Market-entry Strategies for Two-sided Platforms under Competition
    Haurand, Michelle Desiree
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 50 : 1 - 24
  • [28] Two-sided dynamic pricing and value-added service investment strategies of competitive platforms considering indirect network effects
    Sui, Ronghua
    Liu, Molin
    Liu, Yi
    Zha, Xiaoyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2024, 272
  • [29] Competition Between Two-Sided Platforms Under Demand and Supply Congestion Effects
    Bernstein, Fernando
    DeCroix, Gregory A.
    Keskin, N. Bora
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23 (05) : 1043 - 1061
  • [30] Global digital platforms, technology transfer and foreign direct investment policies in two-sided markets
    Klimenko, Mikhail
    Qu, Jingwen
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2023, 61 (03) : 584 - 604