Kinematic Calibration of a 6-DoF Parallel Manipulator With Random and Less Measurements

被引:8
|
作者
He, Zhiyuan [1 ]
Song, Yimin [1 ]
Lian, Binbin [1 ]
Sun, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Mech Theory & Equipment Design, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Kinematics; Calibration; Fasteners; Mathematical models; Joints; Manipulators; Measurement uncertainty; Error modeling; finite and instantaneous screw (FIS); identifiability; kinematic calibration; parallel manipulator (PM); TAYLOR SPATIAL FRAME; ROBOT CALIBRATION; IDENTIFIABLE PARAMETERS; CONFIGURATIONS; ALGORITHM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/TIM.2022.3221149
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Parallel manipulator (PM) embraces more kinematic errors than serial mechanism. The substantial errors in PM usually demand more measurements, which leads to low efficiency and affects the accuracy of identification due to the ill-conditioning problem. Having realized this common problem in the kinematic calibration of PMs, we carried out a finite and instantaneous screw (FIS)-based kinematic calibration on a 6-RUHU PM before application to fracture reduction. R, U, and H denote actuated revolute joint, universal joint, and helical joint, respectively. The error model is built by the error mapping of serial chains in the FIS framework. Instead of devoting to the measurement planning for more precise identification, the identifiability of kinematic errors is thoroughly analyzed. Redundant errors are categorized as the ones within limb and among limbs. A minimal identification model is thus defined and an error conversion method is proposed for compensation. Calibration experiments show that the FIS method has an improved accuracy of the 6-RUHU PM at least one magnitude higher than the precision demand, i.e., mean position and orientation errors 0.0574 mm and 5.1197 x 10(-4) rad after calibration. Compared with the conventional closed-loop vector (CLV) equation method, the accuracy improvement of FIS method is higher. In addition, comparisons with the commonly used configuration selection methods indicate that our method allows random and a smaller number of measurements and can reach satisfactory accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Control of a 6-DOF parallel manipulator through a mechatronic approach
    Rosario, J. M.
    Dumur, D.
    Machado, J. A. T.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2007, 13 (9-10) : 1431 - 1446
  • [32] A 6-DOF adaptive parallel manipulator with large tilting capacity
    Huang, Hailin
    Li, Bing
    Deng, Zongquan
    Hu, Ying
    ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2012, 28 (02) : 275 - 283
  • [33] A new 6-DOF parallel robot with simple kinematic model
    Seward, Nicholas
    Bonev, Ilian A.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2014, : 4061 - 4066
  • [34] Inverse kinematic optimal design of 6-DOF parallel manipulators
    Control and Simulation Center, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
    J. Harbin Inst. Technol., 2008, 1 (18-22):
  • [35] A Belt-Driven 6-DoF Parallel Kinematic Machine
    Negahbani, Navid
    Giberti, Hermes
    Ferrari, Davide
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, VOL 1, 2017, : 481 - 489
  • [36] Mechanism design of a simplified 6-DOF 6-RUS parallel manipulator
    Liu, Xin-Jun
    Wang, Jinsong
    Gao, Feng
    Wang, Li-Ping
    Robotica, 2002, 20 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [37] Mechanism design of a simplified 6-DOF 6-RUS parallel manipulator
    Liu, XJ
    Wang, JS
    Gao, F
    Wang, LP
    ROBOTICA, 2002, 20 : 81 - 91
  • [38] Analytical Solution to Inverse Kinematic Problem for 6-DOF Robot-Manipulator
    Vasilyev, I. A.
    Lyashin, A. M.
    AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 2010, 71 (10) : 2195 - 2199
  • [39] A Step Identification Method for Kinematic Calibration of a 6-DOF Serial Robot
    Tang, Huaiyan
    He, Zhenya
    Ma, Yexin
    Zhang, Xianmin
    MECHANISM AND MACHINE SCIENCE, 2017, 408 : 1009 - 1020
  • [40] Analytical solution to inverse kinematic problem for 6-DOF robot-manipulator
    I. A. Vasilyev
    A. M. Lyashin
    Automation and Remote Control, 2010, 71 : 2195 - 2199