Reproducibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer assessed on a 1.5 T MR-Linac and comparison to parallel measurements on a 3 T diagnostic scanner

被引:1
|
作者
Habrich, Jonas [1 ,9 ]
Boeke, Simon [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fritz, Victor [5 ]
Koerner, Elisa [1 ]
Nikolaou, Konstantin [6 ]
Schick, Fritz [5 ]
Gani, Cihan [4 ]
Zips, Daniel [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ,8 ]
Thorwarth, Daniela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Tubingen, Germany
[2] German Canc Consortium DKTK, partner site Tubingen, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Tubingen, Germany
[5] Univ Tubingen, Sect Expt Radiol, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[6] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Berlin, Germany
[8] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Humboldt Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sect Biomed Phys, Hoppe Seyler Str, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MR guided radiation therapy; Functional imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; MR-Linac; Reproducibility; Apparent diffusion coefficient; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; SALIVARY-GLAND FUNCTION; FIELD-STRENGTH; ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY; COEFFICIENT ADC; B-VALUE; BRAIN; VALUES; REPEATABILITY; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110046
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Before quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) acquired with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for interventional trials in radiotherapy (RT), technical validation of these QIBs is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, derived from diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI, in head and neck cancer using a 1.5 T MR-Linac (MRL) by comparison to a 3 T diagnostic scanner (DS). Material and methods: DW-MRIs were acquired on MRL and DS for 15 head and neck cancer patients before RT and in week 2 and rigidly registered to the planning computed tomography. Mean ADC values were calculated for submandibular (SG) and parotid (PG) glands as well as target volumes (TV, gross tumor volume and lymph nodes), which were delineated based on computed tomography. Mean absolute ADC differences as well as within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all volumes of interest. Results: A total of 23 datasets were analyzed. Mean ADC difference (DS-MRL) for SG, PG and TV resulted in 142, 254 and 93 & sdot;10-6 mm2/s. wCVs/ICCs, comparing MRL and DS, were determined as 13.7 %/0.26, 24.4 %/0.23 and 16.1 %/0.73 for SG, PG and TV, respectively. Conclusion: ADC values, measured on the 1.5 T MRL, showed reasonable reproducibility with an ADC underestimation in contrast to the DS. This ADC shift must be validated in further experiments and considered for future translation of QIB candidates from DS to MRL for response adaptive RT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] T2-and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Daqqaq, Tareef
    Wagner, Moritz
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Huppertz, Alexander
    Renz, Diane
    Hamm, Bernd
    Fischer, Thomas
    Durmus, Tahir
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (06) : 1075 - 1084
  • [32] Comparison of H-scan ultrasound and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Tai, Haowei
    Margolis, Ryan
    Li, Junjie
    Trinh, Brian
    Song, Jane
    Hoyt, Kenneth
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [33] Diffusion tensor imaging on 3-T MRI breast: diagnostic performance in comparison to diffusion-weighted imaging
    Abdelhady, Dalia
    Abdelbary, Amany
    Afifi, Ahmed H.
    Abdelhamid, Alaa-eldin
    Hassan, Hebatallah H. M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):
  • [34] Diffusion tensor imaging on 3-T MRI breast: diagnostic performance in comparison to diffusion-weighted imaging
    Dalia Abdelhady
    Amany Abdelbary
    Ahmed H. Afifi
    Alaa-eldin Abdelhamid
    Hebatallah H. M. Hassan
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [35] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for peripheral zone prostate cancer: the influence of the b-value combination on the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient
    Rezaeian, Abbas
    Ostovari, Mohsen
    Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi, Mojtab
    Khanbabae, Hashem
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : E215 - E219
  • [37] The role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in T staging and grading of urinary bladder cancer
    Abdel-Rahman, Hossam M.
    El Fiki, Inas M.
    Desoky, Esam A. E.
    Elsayed, Ehab R.
    Abd Samad, Khaled M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 46 (03): : 741 - 747
  • [38] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer: Optimal B Value at 3T
    Koo, Ii Hyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Choi, Dongil
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    Kim, Bohyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [39] Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Assessment of the Activity of Crohn Disease: 1.5 or 3 T
    Abd-ALRazek, Ahmed Abd-El Khalek
    Fahmy, Dalia Monir
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2018, 42 (05) : 688 - 696
  • [40] Longitudinal assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging during magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy in head and neck cancer
    Boeke, Simon
    Habrich, Jonas
    Kuebler, Sarah
    Boldt, Jessica
    Schick, Fritz
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Kuebler, Jens
    Gani, Cihan
    Niyazi, Maximilian
    Zips, Daniel
    Thorwarth, Daniela
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01)