Liquefaction numerical analysis of cantilevered retaining walls with saturated backfill containing fines content

被引:1
|
作者
Iraji, Amin [1 ]
Osouli, Abdolreza [2 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Technol, Engn Fac Khoy, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Edwardsville, IL 62026 USA
关键词
Cantilever retaining wall; Saturated backfill; Fines content; Cohesion; Liquefaction; Seismic behavior; GRAVITY QUAY WALLS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-023-02181-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Seismic behavior analyses of cantilever retaining walls are affected by saturated backfills. There are records of retaining walls that include fines content in the backfill with up to 95 kPa cohesiveness. The behavior of such backfills is different than clean cohesionless backfills and affects the retaining wall seismic response and liquefaction potential. Due to lack of such well-instrumented sites for analyses of these types of walls during seismic event, this study aims at analyses of such walls using validated numerical analyses. A 3 m- and 9 m-high cantilever retaining wall with saturated backfill was simulated to investigate the seismic response of the wall under 0.25-0.65 g peak ground acceleration (PGA). The probability of liquefaction and its effects were assessed. To validate the numerical procedure, a cantilever retaining wall modeled in a centrifuge test by others was simulated numerically in a previous research by authors and referred briefly herein. The validated numerical model was used to investigate the effect of dirty backfills with 10 kPa and 30 kPa cohesions on lateral displacement, foundation settlement, total seismic active pressure and its point of action, porewater pressure ratio, backfill deformation pattern, potential failure surfaces (PFS), and wall failure mode.
引用
收藏
页码:4457 / 4483
页数:27
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] Simplified Method for Calculating the Active Earth Pressure on Retaining Walls of Narrow Backfill Width Based on DEM Analysis
    Yang, Minghui
    Deng, Bo
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [22] Seismic Stability Analysis of Sliding Retaining Walls Supporting Unsaturated Backfill with Cracks under Steady Flow Conditions
    Deng, Bo
    Li, Bangyi
    Wang, Zhancheng
    Long, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2025, 25 (03)
  • [23] Numerical analysis of field geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls with secondary reinforcement
    Jiang, Y.
    Han, J.
    Zornberg, J.
    Parsons, R. L.
    Leshchinsky, D.
    Tanyu, B.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2019, 69 (02): : 122 - 132
  • [24] Numerical Limit Analysis of the Stability of Reinforced Retaining Walls with the Strength Reduction Method
    Li, Jinsheng
    Li, Xueqi
    Jing, Mingyuan
    Pang, Rui
    WATER, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [25] Numerical analysis of the installation effect of diaphragm walls in saturated soft clay
    Chen, Jin-Jian
    Lei, Han
    Wang, Jian-Hua
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2014, 9 (06) : 981 - 991
  • [26] Numerical analysis of the installation effect of diaphragm walls in saturated soft clay
    Jin-Jian Chen
    Han Lei
    Jian-Hua Wang
    Acta Geotechnica, 2014, 9 : 981 - 991
  • [27] Liquefaction characteristics of saturated marine coral sand with different non-plastic fines content subjected to complex cyclic stress paths
    Wu, Qi
    Liu, Qifei
    Zhuang, Haiyang
    Chen, Guoxing
    Du, Xiuli
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 281
  • [28] The Role of Retaining Walls in Trackbed Deflection-A Numerical Analysis of Railway Slab Tracks
    Lyu, Pengju
    Luo, Qiang
    Wang, Tengfei
    Liu, Kaiwen
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, VOL 8, ICTG 2024, 2025, 409 : 343 - 353
  • [29] Centrifuge Modeling and Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls with Concrete Block Facing
    Lei Xu
    Hoe I. Ling
    Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2020, 7 : 405 - 425
  • [30] Centrifuge Modeling and Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls with Concrete Block Facing
    Xu, Lei
    Ling, Hoe I.
    TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE GEOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 7 (03) : 405 - 425