Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims

被引:2
|
作者
Hyman, David A. [1 ]
Lerner, Joshua [2 ]
Magid, David J. [3 ]
Black, Bernard [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Ctr Law, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Chicago, NORC, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Hlth, Lafayette, CO USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Pritzker Sch Law, Chicago, IL USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
PHYSICIANS; BAD;
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.5436
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Many physicians believe that most medical malpractice claims are random events. This study assessed the association of prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future paid claims; whether public disclosure of prior paid claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of 1 or more prior paid medical malpractice claims with future paid claims. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study assessed the association between prior paid claims (including a single prior claim) with future claims; whether public disclosure of prior claims affects future paid claims; and whether the association of prior and future paid claims decayed over time. This retrospective case-control study included all 881 876 licensed physicians in the US. All data analysis took place between July, 2018 and January, 2023. EXPOSURE Paid medical malpractice claims. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES Association between a prior paid medical malpractice claim and likelihood of a paid claim in a future period, compared with simulated results expected if paid claims are random events. Using the same outcomes, we also assessed whether public disclosure of paid claims affects future paid claim rates. RESULTS This study included all 881 876 physicians licensed to practice in the US at the time of the study. Overall, 3.3% of the 841 961 physicians with 0 paid claims in the prior period had 1 or more claims in the future period vs 12.4% of the 34 512 physicians with 1 paid claim in the prior period; 22.4% of the 4189 physicians with 2 paid claims in the prior period; and 37% of the 1214 physicians with 3 paid claims in the prior period. The association between prior claims and future claims was similar for high-medical-malpractice-risk and lower-risk specialties; 1 prior-period claim was associated with a 3.1 times higher likelihood of a future-period claim for high-risk specialties (95% CI, 2.8-3.4) vs a 4.2 times higher likelihood for lower-risk specialties (95% CI, 3.8-4.6). The predictive power of a prior paid claim for future claims declined gradually as the time since the prior claim increased, for prior or future periods up to 10 years. Public disclosure did not affect the association between prior and future paid claims. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study of paid medical malpractice claims for all US physicians, a single prior paid claim was associated with substantial, long-lived higher future claim risk, independent of whether a physician was practicing in a high- or low-risk specialty, or whether a state publicly disclosed paid claims. Timely, noncoercive intervention, including education, has the potential to reduce future claims.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: An Analysis of Claims in the Netherlands
    Dronkers, Wouter J.
    Buis, Dennis R.
    Amelink, Quirine J. M. A.
    Bouma, Gert-Joan
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Vandertop, W. Peter
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    Hendriks, Aart C.
    Dirven, Clemens M. F.
    Spoor, Jochem K. H.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (03) : 673 - 680
  • [42] Evaluation of medical malpractice claims in thoracic surgery
    Hosukler, Erdem
    Uzun, Ibrahim
    Hosukler, Bilgin
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 28 (08): : 1109 - 1114
  • [43] MENTAL ANGUISH CLAIMS IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CASES
    OLENIEWSKI, WA
    ZIMMERLY, JG
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1973, 53 (03) : 131 - 132
  • [44] Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysis
    Rubin, Jessica B.
    Bishop, Tara F.
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (06):
  • [45] Association of Emotional Intelligence with Malpractice Claims: A Review
    Watters, Julie
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (02): : 480 - 480
  • [46] Association of Emotional Intelligence With Malpractice Claims A Review
    Shouhed, Daniel
    Beni, Catherine
    Manguso, Nicholas
    IsHak, Waguih William
    Gewertz, Bruce L.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2019, 154 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [47] The forensic medical evaluation of medical malpractice claims in the field of medical pathology
    Ozdemir, Mirac
    Karayel, Ferah
    Sen, Humman
    Inanici, Mehmet Akif
    FORENSIC SCIENCE MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2025,
  • [48] Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation
    Studdert, DM
    Mello, MM
    Gawande, AA
    Gandhi, TK
    Kachalia, A
    Yoon, C
    Puopolo, AL
    Brennan, TA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (19): : 2024 - 2033
  • [49] Frequency of medical malpractice claims: The effects of volumes and specialties
    Buzzacchi, Luigi
    Scellato, Giuseppe
    Ughetto, Elisa
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 170 : 152 - 160
  • [50] MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIMS IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY - UPDATE
    DAHLEN, RT
    FOLEY, HT
    RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (01) : 277 - 277