Influence of system boundary conditions on the life cycle cost and carbon emissions of CO2 transport

被引:1
|
作者
Yuan, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Huixian [1 ]
Nian, Victor [3 ]
Zhu, Lei [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, China Inst FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Frontiers Sci Ctr Full Penetrat Far Reach, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Ctr Strateg Energy Res, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO; 2; transport; Life cycle analysis; System boundary; Carbon price; International shipping; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; SHIP TRANSPORT; ENERGY; CAPTURE; STORAGE; EFFICIENCY; FRAMEWORK; CCS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103847
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the critical stages in carbon capture and storage (CCS) is the transport of CO2 from the point of capture to the storage site. Besides pipeline transport, the present proposition of marine CO2 transport is to make use of vessels that transport chemicals of similar physical properties to CO2 such as liquefied propane gas (LPG) and liquefied natural gas. Through a life cycle analysis, this study examines the influence of system boundary con-ditions on the total cost and benefits of CO2 transport using a reference LPG tanker. While the levelized cost of transport (i.e. shipping) can be intuitively obtained at 31.65-47.05$/t when LPG and CO2 are assumed to be transported as cargos between two fixed ports, the total system-level CO2 emission is contentious when the greater "interconnected" systems including LPG and a fictitious power plant life cycle are considered. Base on the analysis of the proposed most reasonable boundary condition, a break-even carbon price is further examined and found to be ranging from 39.37 to 22.32$/t-CO2. While the boundary conditions can influence the break-even price of CO2, such variations and the associated change in boundary conditions can be used to facilitate pol-icy debate on the right carbon price for international shipping.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Optimization System for Concrete Life Cycle Cost and Related CO2 Emissions
    Kim, Tae Hyoung
    Tae, Sung Ho
    Suk, Sung Joon
    Ford, George
    Yang, Keun Hyek
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (04)
  • [2] Considering embodied CO2 emissions and carbon compensation cost in life cycle cost optimization of carbon-neutral building energy systems
    Ropo, Mikko
    Mustonen, Helka
    Knuutila, Mirika
    Luoranen, Mika
    Kosonen, Antti
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 101
  • [3] THE COST OF CO2 EMISSIONS ACCORDING TO THE TRANSPORT IN SLOVENIA
    Ceh, Iris
    Pirs, Vanja
    Jereb, Borut
    BUSINESS LOGISTICS IN MODERN MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 471 - 484
  • [4] An integrated assessment system for managing life cycle CO2 emissions of a building
    Roh, Seungjun
    Tae, Sungho
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 73 : 265 - 275
  • [5] Life cycle CO2 emissions of a photovoltaic/wind/diesel generating system
    Kemmoku, Y
    Ishikawa, K
    Nakagawa, S
    Kawamoto, T
    Sakakibara, T
    ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING IN JAPAN, 2002, 138 (02) : 14 - 23
  • [6] Estimation of CO2 emissions in life cycle of residential buildings
    Seo, S
    Hwang, Y
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2001, 127 (05): : 414 - 418
  • [7] A Study on Life Cycle CO2 Emissions of Low-Carbon Building in South Korea
    Cho, Su-Hyun
    Chae, Chang-U
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [8] The effect of emissions trading and carbon sequestration on the cost of CO2 emissions mitigation
    Mahasenan, N
    Scott, MJ
    Smith, SJ
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1177 - 1182
  • [9] The influence of the railway industry on transport CO2 emissions under low-carbon background
    Sun, Haining
    Li, Keping
    Ma, Guangyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2025,
  • [10] Minimization of life cycle CO2 emissions in steam and power plants
    Martinez, Pablo E.
    Eliceche, Ana M.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2009, 11 (01) : 49 - 57