Ventral mesh rectopexy. Does a descending perineum impact functional results and quality of life?

被引:1
|
作者
Al-Nejar, Ali [1 ,2 ]
van den Broeck, Sylvie [1 ,2 ]
Smets, Quinten [1 ,2 ]
Plaeke, Philip [1 ,2 ]
Spinhoven, Maarten [3 ]
Hubens, Guy [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Komen, Niels [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Surg, Drie Eikenstraat 655, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[2] Antwerp Surg Training Anat & Res Ctr ASTARC, Antwerp ReSURG, Edegem, Belgium
[3] Antwerp Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Edegem, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp, Med & Hlth Sci, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Perineal descent; Robotic ventral mesh rectopexy; Cleveland Clinic Constipation score; Rome IV criteria; Quality of Life; PELVIC FLOOR; RECTAL PROLAPSE; DYNAMIC MR; SHORT-FORM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-024-03236-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The impact of perineal descent (PD) on functional outcome and quality of life after ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of PD on the functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) after VMR.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on fifty-five patients who underwent robotic VMR between 2018 and 2021. Pre and postoperative data along with radiological studies were gathered from a prospectively maintained database. The Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS), the Rome IV criteria and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), were used to measure functional results and QOL.Results All 55 patients (mean age 57.8 years) were female. Most patients had radiological findings of severe PD (n = 31) as opposed to mild/moderate PD (n = 24). CCCS significantly improved at 3 months and 1 year post-VMR (mean difference = -4.4 and -5.4 respectively, p < 0.001) with no significant difference between the two groups. The percentage of functional constipation Rome IV criteria only showed an improved outcome at 3 months for severe PD and at 1 year for mild/moderate PD (difference = -58.1% and -54.2% respectively, p < 0.05). Only the SF-36 subscale bodily pain significantly improved in the mild/moderate PD group (mean difference = 16.7, p = 0.002) 3 months post-VMR which subsided after one year (mean difference = 5.5, p = 0.068).Conclusion Severe PD may impact the functional outcome of constipation without an evident effect on QOL after VMR. The results, however, remain inconclusive and further research is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-term results for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse
    Wahed, S.
    Ahmad, M.
    Mohiuddin, K.
    Katory, M.
    Mercer-Jones, M.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (10) : 1242 - 1247
  • [42] Laparoscopic ventral Rectopexy for internal Rectal Prolapse Functional Short-Term Results
    Sailer, M.
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2011, 33 (03) : 194 - 196
  • [43] What does the future hold for ventral rectopexy? Functional outcome after laparoscopic posterior sutured rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: six-year follow-up of a double-blind, randomised single-centre study
    Stevenson, Andrew R. L.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2019, 16 : 2 - 3
  • [44] Descending Perineum Associated With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treated by Sacral Colpoperineopexy and Retrorectal Mesh Fixation: Preliminary Results
    Nessi, Aude
    Kane, Aminata
    Vincens, Etienne
    Salet-Lizee, Delphine
    Lepigeon, Karine
    Villet, Richard
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2018, 5
  • [45] Early and Mid-Term Quality of Life Outcomes after Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Symptomatic Rectal Prolapse: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Thrumurthy, S.
    Lewis, T.
    Jarrett, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 84 - 84
  • [46] Genital prolapse repair with Avaulta Plus® mesh: Functional results and quality of life
    Thomin, A.
    Touboul, C.
    Hequet, D.
    Zilberman, S.
    Ballester, M.
    Darai, E.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2013, 23 (04): : 270 - 275
  • [47] Is mesh related morbidity the real thread in ventral rectopexy? Results of a retrospective international multicentre comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh
    Christen, Sebastian
    Barron, Emma
    Gidl, Daniel
    Khoo, Emily
    Potter, Mark
    Stuebi, Nadja
    Geissbuehler, Verena
    Riss, Stefan
    von Strauss, Marco
    Collie, Mhairi
    Steinemann, Daniel C.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [48] LAPAROSCOPIC VENTRAL MESH RECTOPEXY IN STRUCTURAL DISORDERS OF THE POSTERIOR PELVIC COMPONENT: EARLY SURGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES.
    Leventoglu, S.
    Yildiz, A.
    Yildiz, A.
    Mentes, B.
    Oner, Y.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (06) : E285 - E285
  • [49] Impact of Suture Type on Erosion Rate After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Case-Matched Study
    Tejedor, Patricia
    Lindsey, Ian
    Jones, Oliver M.
    Jones, Helen J. S.
    Gorissen, Kim
    Penna, Marta
    Cunningham, Chris
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2019, 62 (12) : 1512 - 1517
  • [50] Functional long-term Data after laparoscopic posterior Sutured Rectopexy versus ventral mesh Rectopexy in Patients with external Rectal Full-Wall Prolapse
    Kim, Mia
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 42 (06) : 505 - 506