Risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe: Current state of play

被引:7
|
作者
Salines, Morgane [1 ]
Lazou, Thomai [2 ]
Gomez-Luengo, Jose [3 ]
Holthe, Janne [4 ]
Nastasijevic, Ivan [5 ]
Bouwknegt, Martijn [6 ]
Dadios, Nikolaos [7 ]
Houf, Kurt [8 ]
Blagojevic, Bojan [9 ]
Antic, Dragan [10 ]
机构
[1] French Minist Agr, Off Slaughterhouses & Cutting Plants, Paris, France
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Vet Med, Lab Anim Food Prod Hyg Vet Publ Hlth, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Food Stand Agcy, London, England
[4] Animalia Norwegian Meat & Poultry Res Ctr, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inst Meat Hyg & Technol, Belgrade, Serbia
[6] Vion Food Grp, Boxtel, Netherlands
[7] Univ London, Royal Vet Coll, London, England
[8] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Ghent, Belgium
[9] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Agr, Dept Vet Med, Novi Sad, Serbia
[10] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect Vet & Ecol Sci, Liverpool, England
关键词
Risk categorisation; Meat safety assurance; Meat inspection; Abattoir; Process hygiene; Carcass; HYGIENE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109863
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In the last decades, a risk-based approach has been identified as a step forward in modernising meat safety system in Europe. Risk categorisation of abattoirs based on their process hygiene and the appropriate use of harmonised epidemiological indicators (HEIs) has been suggested as one essential component of the risk-based meat safety assurance system. However, to date, only a limited number of papers have investigated abattoir risk categorisation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (i) provide an overview of the use of risk cate-gorisation systems in poultry, pig, cattle and small ruminant abattoirs in Europe and (ii) explore the criteria, relevance and applicability of risk categorisation systems for competent authorities (CAs). To that aim, a questionnaire was designed and sent to representatives of 35 European CAs. Of the 18/35 respondents (51%), 14 (78%) indicated that abattoirs in their country are categorised according to their food safety risk in a systematic way, whilst four countries (22%) do not categorise abattoirs according to their food safety risk. The main re-ported purpose of categorising abattoirs is to adapt the frequency of official controls. Major differences in the described categorisation systems were found between countries, particularly in their complexity and the criteria used. The number of included criteria ranged from 1 to 10, the main ones being the outcomes of the CA's official audits (78% of the 14 countries), the size of abattoirs (64%), the relevance and credibility of HACCP plans (57%) and export agreements of abattoirs (43%). Less than a third of the surveyed countries indicated they utilise results of microbiological testing as a basis for risk categorisation of abattoirs, and no country has formally included HEIs in its risk categorisation system. The effectiveness of the implemented risk categorisation systems was assessed in five countries only (36%), but with the use of unclear methodology and assessment criteria. More than 80% of respondents expressed their wish to be provided with a practical method for categorising abattoirs according to their pertained food safety risks. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the need to develop a fit-for-purpose and science-based framework for risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Frailty and Nutrition - the Current State of Play and Outlook for the Future
    Bonnefoy, M.
    Gilbert, T.
    CAHIERS DE L ANNEE GERONTOLOGIQUE, 2015, 7 (01): : 8 - 12
  • [42] The ‘current state of play’ in transplantation and restoration research of the CNS
    David J. Eve
    Paul R. Sanberg
    Neurotoxicity Research, 2007, 11 : 145 - 150
  • [43] Advances in pharmacotherapy for myelofibrosis: what is the current state of play?
    Tiribelli, Mario
    Morelli, Gianluca
    Bonifacio, Massimiliano
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 25 (06) : 743 - 754
  • [44] The Floating Charge under the PPSA: The Current State of Play
    McCracken, Sheelagh
    AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS LAW REVIEW, 2019, 47 (06): : 418 - 441
  • [45] KINSHIP STUDIES - SOME IMPRESSIONS OF THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY
    BARNES, JA
    MAN, 1980, 15 (02): : 293 - 303
  • [47] Facial approximation: A review of the current state of play for archaeologists
    Stephan, CN
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOARCHAEOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [48] Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer: Current State of Play
    Bridoux, Marie
    Simon, Nicolas
    Turpin, Anthony
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [49] Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play
    Kredo, Tamara
    Bernhardsson, Susanne
    Machingaidze, Shingai
    Young, Taryn
    Louw, Quinette
    Ochodo, Eleanor
    Grimmer, Karen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 28 (01) : 122 - 128
  • [50] The murky waters of the coxibs: A review of the current state of play
    Ostor A.J.K.
    Hazleman B.L.
    InflammoPharmacology, 2005, 13 (4) : 371 - 380