Risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe: Current state of play

被引:7
|
作者
Salines, Morgane [1 ]
Lazou, Thomai [2 ]
Gomez-Luengo, Jose [3 ]
Holthe, Janne [4 ]
Nastasijevic, Ivan [5 ]
Bouwknegt, Martijn [6 ]
Dadios, Nikolaos [7 ]
Houf, Kurt [8 ]
Blagojevic, Bojan [9 ]
Antic, Dragan [10 ]
机构
[1] French Minist Agr, Off Slaughterhouses & Cutting Plants, Paris, France
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Vet Med, Lab Anim Food Prod Hyg Vet Publ Hlth, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Food Stand Agcy, London, England
[4] Animalia Norwegian Meat & Poultry Res Ctr, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inst Meat Hyg & Technol, Belgrade, Serbia
[6] Vion Food Grp, Boxtel, Netherlands
[7] Univ London, Royal Vet Coll, London, England
[8] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Vet & Biosci, Ghent, Belgium
[9] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Agr, Dept Vet Med, Novi Sad, Serbia
[10] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect Vet & Ecol Sci, Liverpool, England
关键词
Risk categorisation; Meat safety assurance; Meat inspection; Abattoir; Process hygiene; Carcass; HYGIENE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109863
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
In the last decades, a risk-based approach has been identified as a step forward in modernising meat safety system in Europe. Risk categorisation of abattoirs based on their process hygiene and the appropriate use of harmonised epidemiological indicators (HEIs) has been suggested as one essential component of the risk-based meat safety assurance system. However, to date, only a limited number of papers have investigated abattoir risk categorisation. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (i) provide an overview of the use of risk cate-gorisation systems in poultry, pig, cattle and small ruminant abattoirs in Europe and (ii) explore the criteria, relevance and applicability of risk categorisation systems for competent authorities (CAs). To that aim, a questionnaire was designed and sent to representatives of 35 European CAs. Of the 18/35 respondents (51%), 14 (78%) indicated that abattoirs in their country are categorised according to their food safety risk in a systematic way, whilst four countries (22%) do not categorise abattoirs according to their food safety risk. The main re-ported purpose of categorising abattoirs is to adapt the frequency of official controls. Major differences in the described categorisation systems were found between countries, particularly in their complexity and the criteria used. The number of included criteria ranged from 1 to 10, the main ones being the outcomes of the CA's official audits (78% of the 14 countries), the size of abattoirs (64%), the relevance and credibility of HACCP plans (57%) and export agreements of abattoirs (43%). Less than a third of the surveyed countries indicated they utilise results of microbiological testing as a basis for risk categorisation of abattoirs, and no country has formally included HEIs in its risk categorisation system. The effectiveness of the implemented risk categorisation systems was assessed in five countries only (36%), but with the use of unclear methodology and assessment criteria. More than 80% of respondents expressed their wish to be provided with a practical method for categorising abattoirs according to their pertained food safety risks. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrate the need to develop a fit-for-purpose and science-based framework for risk categorisation of abattoirs in Europe.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk categorisation of poultry abattoirs on the basis of the current process hygiene criteria and indicator microorganisms
    Cegar, Simo
    Kuruca, Ljiljana
    Vidovic, Bojana
    Antic, Dragan
    Hauge, Sigrun J.
    Alvseike, Ole
    Blagojevic, Bojan
    FOOD CONTROL, 2022, 132
  • [2] Molecular evolution of PRRSV in Europe: Current state of play
    Stadejek, Tomasz
    Stankevicius, Arunas
    Murtaugh, Michael P.
    Oleksiewicz, Martin B.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 165 (1-2) : 21 - 28
  • [3] State of play in Europe
    Anon
    Fire Prevention, 1990, (235): : 20 - 21
  • [4] THE CURRENT STATE OF PLAY
    SMITH, PK
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1982, 5 (01) : 172 - 178
  • [5] Current state of play
    Haas, Francois
    INTEGRATING EUROPE'S FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2007, : 41 - 63
  • [6] Understanding eParticipation State of Play in Europe
    Tambouris, Efthimios
    Macintosh, Ann
    Smith, Simon
    Panopoulou, Eleni
    Tarabanis, Konstantinos
    Millard, Jeremy
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (04) : 321 - 330
  • [7] EuroQol: The current state of play
    Brooks, R
    HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [8] Inflammometry: the current state of play
    Pavord, Ian D.
    Gibson, Peter G.
    THORAX, 2012, 67 (03) : 191 - 192
  • [9] Australian Superannuation: The Current State of Play
    Chomik, Rafal
    Piggott, John
    AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 49 (04) : 483 - 493
  • [10] Part IIIA - the current state of play
    Quinn, Verity
    Healy, Rosannah
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF COMPETITION AND CONSUMER LAW, 2013, 21 (04):