No sign of weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hip and calf muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament injury

被引:3
|
作者
Girdwood, Michael [1 ]
Culvenor, Adam G. [1 ]
Patterson, Brooke [2 ]
Haberfield, Melissa [3 ]
Rio, Ebonie Kendra [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hedger, Michael [6 ]
Crossley, Kay M. [6 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Sport & Exercise Med Res Ctr, Sch Allied Hlth Human Serv & Sport, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sport & Exercise Med Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Sport & Exercise Med Res Ctr, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
[4] Victorian Inst Sport, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Australian Ballet, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; hip; calf; rehabilitation; LOWER-EXTREMITY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; RESPONSE RATIOS; RECONSTRUCTION; KINEMATICS; RETURN; PAIN; REHABILITATION; PERFORMANCE; SYMMETRY;
D O I
10.1136/bjsports-2023-107536
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective We aimed to determine hip and lower-leg muscle strength in people after ACL injury compared with an uninjured control group (between people) and the uninjured contralateral limb (between limbs). Design Systematic review with meta-analysis. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL and SportDiscus to 28 February 2023. Eligibility criteria Primary ACL injury with mean age 18-40 years at time of injury. Studies had to measure hip and/or lower-leg muscle strength quantitatively (eg, dynamometer) and report muscle strength for the ACL-injured limb compared with: (i) an uninjured control group and/or (ii) the uninjured contralateral limb. Risk of bias was assessed according to Cochrane Collaboration domains. Results Twenty-eight studies were included (n=23 measured strength <= 12 months post-ACL reconstruction). Most examined hip abduction (16 studies), hip extension (12 studies) and hip external rotation (7 studies) strength. We found no meaningful difference in muscle strength between people or between limbs for hip abduction, extension, internal rotation, flexion or ankle plantarflexion, dorsiflexion (estimates ranged from -9% to +9% of comparator). The only non-zero differences identified were in hip adduction (24% stronger on ACL limb (95% CI 8% to 42%)) and hip external rotation strength (12% deficit on ACL limb (95% CI 6% to 18%)) compared with uninjured controls at follow-ups >12 months, however both results stemmed from only two studies. Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes and comparisons, and drawn primarily from the first year post-ACL reconstruction. Conclusion Our results do not show widespread or substantial muscle weakness of the hip and lower-leg muscles after ACL injury, contrasting deficits of 10%-20% commonly reported for knee extensors and flexors. As it is unclear if deficits in hip and lower-leg muscle strength resolve with appropriate rehabilitation or no postinjury or postoperative weakness occurs, individualised assessment should guide training of hip and lower-leg strength following ACL injury. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020216793.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 510
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Vertical Jump Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dutaillis, Benjamin
    Diamond, Laura e.
    Lazarczuk, Stephanie l.
    Timmins, Ryan g.
    Bourne, Matthew n.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2024, 56 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [32] Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    David A. Sherman
    Neal R. Glaviano
    Grant E. Norte
    Sports Medicine, 2021, 51 : 1751 - 1769
  • [33] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk Factors for an Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Zhang, Lei
    Yang, Runze
    Mao, Yunhe
    Fu, Weili
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [34] Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sherman, David A.
    Glaviano, Neal R.
    Norte, Grant E.
    SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (08) : 1751 - 1769
  • [35] Hospital readmission after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shao, Long
    Wu, Di
    Li, Jia-Ying
    Wu, Xiang-Dong
    Zhou, Xi
    Qiu, Gui-Xing
    Luo, Changqi
    Xiao, Peng-Cheng
    Liu, Jia-Cheng
    Huang, Wei
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [36] Authors’ Response to Comment on “Lower Limb Muscle Size After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis”
    Benjamin Dutaillis
    Nirav Maniar
    David Opar
    Jack Hickey
    Ryan Timmins
    Sports Medicine, 2022, 52 : 1207 - 1209
  • [37] Hip and Knee Kinematics and Kinetics During Landing Tasks After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lepley, Adam S.
    Kuenze, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2018, 53 (02) : 144 - 159
  • [38] Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Knee Injury Prevention Programs for Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Grimm, Nathan L.
    Jacobs, John C., Jr.
    Kim, Jaewhan
    Denney, Brandon S.
    Shea, Kevin G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (08): : 2049 - 2056
  • [39] Clinical examination of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Wenhan
    Zhang, Yu
    Yao, Zilong
    Ma, Linmin
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [40] Tranexamic Acid in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Johns, William L.
    Walley, Kempland C.
    Hammoud, Sommer
    Gonzalez, Tyler A.
    Ciccotti, Michael G.
    Patel, Nirav K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (14): : 4030 - 4041