Human emotional evaluation of ancestral and modern threats: fear, disgust, and anger

被引:3
|
作者
Peleskova, Sarka [1 ]
Polak, Jakub [1 ,2 ]
Janovcova, Marketa [1 ]
Chomik, Aleksandra [1 ]
Sedlackova, Kristyna [3 ]
Frynta, Daniel [1 ]
Landova, Eva [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Sci, Dept Zool, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Ambis Univ, Dept Econ & Management, Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Klecany, Czech Republic
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
anger; COVID-19; fear of heights; fear of snakes; ontogenetic threat; oral disgust; pandemic of airborne disease; phylogenetic threat; ANXIETY DISORDERS; MORAL DISGUST; EVOLUTIONARY; PHOBIAS; DISEASE; STRESS; SENSITIVITY; AMYGDALA; SYSTEM; BRAIN;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1321053
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
IntroductionAnimal and human ancestors developed complex physiological and behavioral response systems to cope with two types of threats: immediate physical harm from predators or conspecifics, triggering fear, and the risk of infections from parasites and pathogens leading to the evolution of the behavioral immune system with disgust as the key emotion. Integration of the evolutionary concepts of the fear module and behavioral immune systems has been infrequent, despite the significant survival advantages of disgust in various contexts. Studies comparing attention to ancestral and modern threats accompanied by fear have yielded ambiguous results and what qualifies as salient modern disgusting stimuli remains unclear. We do not know whether disgust or the behavioral immune system, as inherent aspects of human psychology, have adapted to safeguard us from pandemic risks or poisoning by modern toxic substances.MethodsTo test these effects, we have developed a survey comprised of 60 short vignettes describing threats evoking fear and disgust belonging to one of the three main categories of threats: (1) ancestral (phylogenetic), (2) modern (ontogenetic), and (3) pandemics of airborne disease. Each vignette was evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale based on fear, disgust, and anger. In total, 660 respondents completed the survey. The data were analysed using a factor analysis and general linear model with the respondent as a random factor.ResultsThe results show that the strongest fear is triggered by modern threats (electricity, car accidents), while the highest disgust is evoked by ancient threats (body waste products, worms, etc.). Interestingly, disgust does not respond to modern threat stimuli such as toxic substances or radioactivity as these evoke mainly fear and anger. Finally, a distinct response pattern was found for pandemic threats, in which both fear (e.g., of disease and death) and disgust (e.g., of used face masks) are employed.DiscussionOur study offers valuable insights into the emotional responses to ancestral and modern threats and their adaptation to pandemic challenges. Ancestral threats are not always more powerful stimuli than adequate threats of the modern type, but they function specifically. Thus, snakes and heights as fear-inducing ancestral threats form separate factors in a multivariate analysis, whereas all ancestral disgust stimuli group together. The threat of a pandemic forms a specific category and people process it emotionally and cognitively. These insights contribute to our understanding of human psychology and behavior in an ever-changing world.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Harnessing Anger and Shame: Emotional Diplomacy in Early Modern Context
    Lemee, Emmanuel
    DIPLOMATICA, 2021, 3 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [32] Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust
    Reynolds, Lisa M.
    Bissett, Ian P.
    Consedine, Nathan S.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [33] Emotional predictors of bowel screening: the avoidance-promoting role of fear, embarrassment, and disgust
    Lisa M. Reynolds
    Ian P. Bissett
    Nathan S. Consedine
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [34] The emotional life of populism. How fear, disgust, resentment and love undermine democracy
    Diaz, David del Pino
    ATHENEA DIGITAL, 2024, 24 (02):
  • [35] Do All Threats Work the Same Way? Divergent Effects of Fear and Disgust on Sensory Perception and Attention
    Krusemark, Elizabeth A.
    Li, Wen
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (09): : 3429 - 3434
  • [36] Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis
    Wagner, Markus
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2014, 36 (03) : 683 - 703
  • [37] Anticipated Coping With Interpersonal Stressors: Links With the Emotional Reactions of Sadness, Anger, and Fear
    Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J.
    Skinner, Ellen A.
    Morris, Helen
    Thomas, Rae
    JOURNAL OF EARLY ADOLESCENCE, 2013, 33 (05): : 684 - 709
  • [38] Emotional reactions of rape victim advocates: A multiple case study of anger and fear
    Wasco, SM
    Campbell, R
    PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2002, 26 (02) : 120 - 130
  • [39] Anger, fear, or sadness: Faculty members' emotional reactions to collective pay disadvantage
    Smith, Heather J.
    Cronin, Tracey
    Kessler, Thomas
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 29 (02) : 221 - 246
  • [40] Fear, Anger, and Loneliness: Emotional Pain and Referee Attrition in English Grassroots Football
    Potrac, Paul A.
    Hall, Edward T.
    Nichol, Adam J.
    SOCIOLOGY OF SPORT JOURNAL, 2022, 39 (03) : 298 - 308