Quantitative evaluation of ecological and environmental impacts caused by future mining

被引:6
|
作者
Zhang, Jiwei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Junling [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Yirong [3 ]
Wu, Chao [1 ]
Li, Hua [4 ]
Qing, Zhanhui [5 ]
Li, Jinxiang [5 ]
Zhang, Wei [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geochem, CAS Key Lab Mineral & Metallogeny, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Prov Acad Environm Sci, Guangdong Key Lab Contaminated Sites Environm Mana, Guangzhou 510045, Peoples R China
[4] MNR Technol Innovat Ctr Explorat & Exploitat Strat, Qinghai Prov Geol Survey Bur, Xining, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Prov Geol Environm Monitoring Stn, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological and environmental impact; Quantitative evaluation; Mining; The Western Guangdong Gold Deposit Belt; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105672
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Mineral resources are served as critical parts of socioeconomic development. Nevertheless, mining activities will inevitably bring some ecological and environmental impacts. Quantifying such impacts has become an increasingly vital need in the future. A dynamic framework of quantifying eco-environmental impact for mining based on economic monetary terms is creatively set up utilizing ecosystem service loss and environmental impact with 15 mutually independent indicators, which was applied to the Western Guangdong Gold Deposit Belt (WGGDB). The research results indicate that the Huangnikeng gold deposit has the slightest eco-environmental impact (1,763,800 yuan per year), and the Hetai mine has the highest impact (3,600,900 yuan per year). In addition, these results also reveal that ecosystem service loss and environment impact value per ton could play a significant role in making judgments on the priority for development of mines. Ultimately, the quantitative method proposed for eco-environmental impact in this study provides a new visualization perspective to promote our understanding of sustainable development and mining activities in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets
    NASA, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field
    CA
    94035-1000, United States
    不详
    CA
    90095-1565, United States
    不详
    CA
    94550, United States
    不详
    CO
    803090392, United States
    Reviews of Geophysics, 1997, 35 (01): : 41 - 78
  • [43] Environmental impacts caused by Paddy field management
    Murty, V.V.N.
    Don, N. Cao
    Araki, H.
    Lowland Technology International, 2009, 11 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [44] Introduction to MINEO project of European community and its enlightenments to monitoring and assessment of environmental impacts caused by mining in China
    Department of RS and GIS, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China
    不详
    Meitan Xuebao, 2008, 1 (71-75):
  • [45] Evaluation of ecological safety in mining area based on ecological footprint
    Chen, Qiuji
    Kong, Yunfeng
    Liu, Changhua
    Hu, Zhenqi
    PROGRESS IN MINING SCIENCE AND SAFETY TECHNOLOGY, PTS A AND B, 2007, : 1951 - 1955
  • [46] Defining a quantitative framework for evaluation and optimisation of the environmental impacts of mega-event projects
    Parkes, Olga
    Lettieri, Paola
    Bogle, I. David L.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 167 : 236 - 245
  • [48] Parametrization and evaluation of marine environmental impacts produced by deep-sea manganese nodule mining
    Oebius, HU
    Becker, HJ
    Rolinski, S
    Jankowski, JA
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART II-TOPICAL STUDIES IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2001, 48 (17-18) : 3453 - 3467
  • [49] Ecological numeracy: Quantitative analysis of environmental issues
    Randolph, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (01) : 101 - 101
  • [50] Evaluation of environmental impacts for future influent scenarios using a model-based approach
    Andersson, S.
    Rahmberg, M.
    Nilsson, A.
    Grundestam, C.
    Saagi, R.
    Lindblom, E.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 81 (08) : 1615 - 1622