Characterization of the stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplant for heart, liver, and kidney transplant candidates in Japan

被引:5
|
作者
Takano, Kosuke [1 ]
Oshibuchi, Hidehiro [1 ]
Kobayashi, Sayaka [1 ,2 ]
Tsutsui, Junko [1 ,3 ]
Ito, Satoko [1 ]
Kamba, Rumiko [1 ]
Akaho, Rie [1 ]
Nishimura, Katsuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Psychiat, 8-1 Kawada Cho,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Saitama Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Saitama 1981, Kawagoe, Saitama 3508550, Japan
[3] Denen Chofu Univ, Fac Human Sci, 3-4-1 Higashiyurigaoka,Asao Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 2158542, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Organ-specific; Pre-transplant evaluation; Post-transplant outcomes; Psychosocial support; Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for transplantation; Transplant recipient; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; VERSION; SIPAT; PREDICTORS; SURVIVAL; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13030-023-00281-6
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a comprehensive psychosocial assessment proven useful for predicting the outcomes of organ transplantation that is expected to be useful in Japan. However, the characteristics of organ-specific SIPAT scores for organ transplant recipient candidates in Japan are unclear and, to date, the SIPAT has not been properly utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to present basic data that can be used to establish the relation between SIPAT scores and post-transplantation psychosocial outcomes as well as organ-specific outcomes.MethodsThis study included 167 transplant recipient candidates (25 heart, 71 liver, and 71 kidney) who completed a semi-structured interview based on the Japanese version of SIPAT (SIPAT-J) prior to transplantation. The differences between organs in terms of SIPAT scores and differences in SIPAT scores based on demographic data were comparatively analyzed.ResultsThe total SIPAT scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .019). Regarding the subscales, SIPAT B (social support system) scores were higher for liver and kidney recipient candidates than for heart recipient candidates (P = .021), whereas SIPAT C (psychological stability and psychopathology) scores were higher for liver recipient candidates than for kidney recipient candidates (P = .002). Recipient candidates with a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were unemployed had higher SIPAT scores, regardless of the transplant organ, than recipient candidates without a history of psychiatric treatment and those who were employed (P < .001, P = .016, respectively).ConclusionsThere were notable differences in the total SIPAT-J and subscale scores among the liver, heart, and kidney recipient candidates. Each organ was associated with specific psychosocial issues that should be addressed before transplantation. Interventions such as information provision and patient education based on SIPAT assessment results for each organ may improve recipient post-transplant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ITEM-LEVEL PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF THE STANFORD INTEGRATED PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT FOR TRANSPLANT (SIPAT)
    Teh, Lisa
    Henderson, Danielle R.
    Chernyak, Yelena
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S785 - S785
  • [42] Training for Transplant: Frailty Assessment and Optimization in Kidney Transplant Candidates
    Mrdutt, M.
    Doherty, D.
    Tanner, S.
    Lappin, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 319 - 320
  • [43] Preoperative assessment of candidates for liver transplant
    Concha, M
    Munoz, H
    Gonzalez, A
    Fasola, C
    Vinuela, MD
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 1997, 125 (11) : 1377 - 1382
  • [44] STANFORD INTEGRATED PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT TRANSPLANT (SIPAT) OUTPERFORMS SALT IN PREDICTING ALCOHOL RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOLIC LIVER DISEASE (ALD) UNDERGOING EVALUATION FOR LIVER TRANSPLANT (LT)
    Singh, Jasleen
    Joyce, Cara
    Scaglione, Steven J.
    Betcher, Stephanie
    Tey, Kai Rou
    Schmidt, Benjamin
    Kasia, Chris
    Orekondy, Nayantara
    Cotter, Scott J.
    Doyle, Todd
    HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 72 : 192A - 192A
  • [45] The Psychosocial Assessment of Transplant Candidates: Internal Consistency, Interrater Reliability, and Content Validity of the Thai Version of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT-Thai Version)
    Thisayakorn, Paul
    Sakunwetsa, Dussadee
    Tangwongchai, Sookjaroen
    Jirakran, Ketsupa
    Lolak, Sermsak
    Maldonado, Jose R.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 53 (03) : 779 - 785
  • [46] Assessment of Transplant Health Literacy of Liver Transplant Candidates and Their Caregivers
    Bababekov, Yanik
    Fong, Zhi Ven
    Adler, Joel
    Yeh, Heidi
    Chang, David
    Pomposelli, James
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 62 - 63
  • [47] Psychosocial and behavioural factors in heart transplant candidates - an overview
    Spaderna, Heike
    Smits, Jacqueline M. A.
    Rahmel, Axel O.
    Weidner, Gerdi
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 (11) : 909 - 920
  • [48] Assessment of Transplant Health Literacy of Liver Transplant Candidates and Their Caregivers
    Bababekov, Y.
    Fong, Z.
    Adler, J.
    Yeh, H.
    Chang, D.
    Pomposelli, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 518 - 518
  • [49] PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF HEART TRANSPLANT REJECTION
    Knieling, Anton
    Grecu, Bogdan
    Cotrutz, Carmen Elena
    Sin, Anca Ileana
    Temelie-Olinici, Doinita
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2022, 30 (01): : 66 - 72
  • [50] INTEGRATION OF AN ENHANCED PSYCHOSOCIAL EVALUATION PROCESS FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES: COUNTDOWN TO TRANSPLANT CLINIC
    Clifton, Erin
    Eshelman, Anne
    Kim, Dean Y.
    Patel, Anita
    Hogan, Kathleen
    Rubinstein, Elizabeth
    Ramirez, Daisy J.
    Jesse, Michelle
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S548 - S548