Impacts of carbon markets and subsidies on carbon capture and storage retrofitting of existing coal-fired units in China

被引:11
|
作者
Li, Kaiyuan [1 ]
Yang, Jin [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Yanting [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Land & Resource, Key Lab Carrying Capac Assessment Resource & Envir, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Life cycle cost; Carbon market; Subsidy; Carbon reduction; CCS INVESTMENT EVALUATION; POWER-PLANTS; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; SEQUESTRATION; ALLOCATION; EMISSIONS; COST; TECHNOLOGIES; AUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116824
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a feasible technology option to reduce carbon emission in the power in-dustry. However, the high cost of CCS deployment in power plants precludes its large-scale application. Carbon markets may act as an incentive for CCS, but the impact of auction and quota allocation mechanisms in carbon markets on CCS is unclear. In order to investigate the roles of the auction and quota allocation mechanism on the CCS retrofitting in coal-fired units, the life-cycle cost method was used to evaluate the CCS retrofitting cost of China's coal-fired units in the carbon market after supplementing the existing database. The impact of subsidies on stimulating CCS retrofitting was jointly considered. The results show that most units have a CCS retrofit Levelized additional cost of electricity (Lacoe) of $25.24/MWh to $64.57/MWh, making the CCS retrofitting burdensome, even for ultra-supercritical unit that has a low cost. The combination of grandfathering quota allocation mechanism and subsidy will effectively promote CCS retrofitting of coal-fired units, especially when the auction ratio is 30%-40%, about 400-540 GW units will be retrofitted under the carbon market using grandfathering and 12.05$/MWh-22.77$/MWh subsidies. Additionally, there are significant differences among provinces in terms of the lifetime costs of the CCS retrofitting of coal-fired units. Xinjiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu, with retrofitting potentials of respectively 20.68 GW, 10.58 GW-43.00 GW and 15.00 GW-52.27 GW are best suited for the CCS retrofitting of coal-fired units.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Demonstrations of coal-fired oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage and issues with commercial deployment
    Wall, Terry
    Stanger, Rohan
    Santos, Stanley
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 : S5 - S15
  • [32] Macroeconomic Impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage in China
    Haakon Vennemo
    Jianwu He
    Shantong Li
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 59 : 455 - 477
  • [33] Macroeconomic Impacts of Carbon Capture and Storage in China
    Vennemo, Haakon
    He, Jianwu
    Li, Shantong
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 59 (03): : 455 - 477
  • [34] Investigation on thermal system performance of solar-double reheat coal-fired units based on carbon capture
    Guo, Shiqi
    Li, Chunxi
    Ye, Xuemin
    Fu, Wenfeng
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2020, 41 (11): : 156 - 166
  • [35] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coal-fired power plants in China: The technology lock-in and cost optimization perspective
    Fan, Jing-Li
    Xu, Mao
    Li, Fengyu
    Yang, Lin
    Zhang, Xian
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 229 : 326 - 334
  • [36] Carbon Footprint for Mercury Capture from Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gas
    Gazda-Grzywacz, Magdalena
    Winconek, Lukasz
    Burmistrz, Piotr
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (13)
  • [37] Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants
    Supekar, Sarang D.
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (20) : 12576 - 12584
  • [38] Assessment of carbon capture thermodynamic limitation on coal-fired power plant efficiency
    Le Moullec, Yann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 7 : 192 - 201
  • [39] Concept of a demo carbon-capture plant for coal-fired power unit
    Tatarczuk, Adam
    Stec, Macin
    Sciazko, Marek
    Wieclaw-Solny, Lucyna
    Krotki, Aleksander
    PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2016, 95 (11): : 2322 - 2325
  • [40] Analysis and optimization of CO2 capture in an existing coal-fired power plant in China
    Xu, Gang
    Yang, Yong-ping
    Ding, Jie
    Li, Shoucheng
    Liu, Wenyi
    Zhang, Kai
    ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 117 - 127