Relationships between hope, optimism, and conservation engagement

被引:14
|
作者
Dean, Angela J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Wilson, Kerrie A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Ctr Environm, Sch Biol & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
behavior change; conservation psychology; conservation threats; coping appraisal; efficacy; motivation; positive messages; threat appraisal; GREAT-BARRIER-REEF; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM; NEWS MEDIA; EMOTION; HEALTH; PERCEPTIONS; VALIDATION; NARRATIVES;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.14020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The loss and degradation of nature can lead to hopelessness and despair, which may undermine engagement in conservation actions. Emerging movements, such as that behind the organization Conservation Optimism, aim to avert potential despair of those involved in conservation. Some argue that fostering positive states, such as hope or optimism, can motivate engagement and action; however, others question whether fostering hope or optimism may inadvertently undermine perceived gravity of conservation challenges. We examined this issue by quantifying dispositional hope and optimism with a representative sample of Australians (n = 4285) and assessing their relationship with indicators of conservation engagement. We used the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in Australia as a case study. We asked participants what they could do to help the GBR, then classified their responses into 2 outcome variables: identifying climate actions (i.e., actions that tackle the main threat to the reef) and identifying plastic actions (i.e., actions that are popular among community members). We also quantified likelihood of performing these actions and appraisals of both threats and actions. One dimension of hope, hope pathways (defined by Snyder's hope theory as knowing different ways to act), was associated with greater capacity to identify climate-related behaviors (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44) and plastic reduction behaviors (OR = 1.22) and greater likelihood of adopting climate-related actions (beta = 0.20). Optimism was associated with recognition of plastic reduction behaviors only (OR = 1.22). Neither hope nor optimism undermined appraisal of conservation threats. The effects of optimism were mediated by reduced action futility, and effects of hope pathways were mediated by stronger perceptions of threats to the reef (threat appraisal) and confidence in performing useful actions (coping appraisal). Our findings suggest that dispositional hope can strengthen, rather than undermine, appraisal of conservation challenges and solutions and thereby increase conservation engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hope, optimism and promises for 2021
    不详
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2021, 1
  • [22] Terminal Optimism, Terminal Hope
    Reeman, Ilene M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 165 (12): : 1518 - 1519
  • [23] The science of optimism and hope - Introduction
    Gillham, JE
    SCIENCE OF OPTIMISM AND HOPE: RESEARCH ESSAYS IN HONOR OF MARTIN E.P. SELIGMAN, 2000, 2 : 3 - 10
  • [24] Optimism and hope in a hotter time
    Orr, David W.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1392 - 1395
  • [25] Hope, Optimism, and Compassionate Communication
    Sisk, Bryan A.
    Malone, Jay R.
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2018, 172 (04)
  • [26] Looking to 2021 with hope and optimism
    Chow, Matthew C.
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 63 (01): : 6 - 6
  • [27] Optimism, Pessimism, and Hope in Durkheim
    Carlos M. Neves
    Journal of Happiness Studies, 2003, 4 (2) : 169 - 183
  • [28] Weaponizing Hope: Sources of Hope, Unrealistic Optimism, and Denial
    Michie, Marsha
    Allyse, Megan
    Stoll, Katie A.
    Master, Zubin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (09): : 25 - 27
  • [29] Stakeholder influence and relationships inform engagement strategies in marine conservation
    Ison, Sierra
    Pecl, Gretta
    Hobday, Alistair J.
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Van Putten, Ingrid
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) : 320 - 341
  • [30] Between Heaven and Earth - Evangelical engagement in conservation
    Van Dyke, F
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) : 1693 - 1696